Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 16))

  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

Blackwell sufficiency is an accepted instrument for comparison of random experiments.In this paper we discuss, whether Blackwell sufficiency is a suitable instrument to characterize fuzziness and nonspecificity of experiments. The answer will be: Yes in special cases, no in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. A. Blackwell (1951). Comparison of experiments. Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. on Math.Statist. Prob., pages 93–102. University of Colifornia Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Blackwell (1953). Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann. Math. Statist.24: 265–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Joel E. Cohen and J.H.B. Kemperman and Gh. Zbäganu (1998). Comparison of stochastic matrices Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Gil (1992). Sufficiency and fuzziness in random experiments. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.44 (3): 451–462.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G.J. Klir and T.A. Folger (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kruse and K.D. Meyer (1987). Statistics with Vague Data. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Näther and A. Wünsche, Blackwell sufficiency and fuzzy experiments. accepted for puplication in Fuzzy Sets and Systems

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.L. Puri and D.A. Ralescu (1986). Fuzzy random variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl.114: 409–422.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R.Körner and W.Näther (1995). On the specificity of evidences. Fuzzy sets and systems. 71: 183–196.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Shafer (1976). Amathematical theory of evidence. Princeton-London: Princenton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erik Torgersen (1991). Comparison of Statistical Experiments.Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L.A. Zadeh (1968). Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math. Anal. Appl.23: 421–427.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wünsche, A. (2002). Blackwell Sufficiency and Fuzzy Experiments. In: Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O., Gil, M.Á. (eds) Soft Methods in Probability, Statistics and Data Analysis. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 16. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1773-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1773-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1526-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1773-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics