The Labels in Agriculture, Their Impact on Trade and the Scope for International Policy Action

  • Stéphan Marette
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)


European Union Fair Trade Trade Liberalization Mutual Recognition International Standard Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock B, Clemens R (2004) Geographical indications and property rights: protecting value-added agricultural products. MATRIC Briefing Paper 04-MBP 7. Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University, May 2004Google Scholar
  3. Bazoche P, Combris P, Giraud-Heraud E (2005) Willingness to pay for appellation of origin in the world chardonnay’s war: an experimental study. Mimeo, Institute National de la recherche agronomique, IvryGoogle Scholar
  4. Beales H, Craswell R, Salop S (1981) The efficient regulation of consumer information. Journal of Law and Economics 24:491–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benitez D, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Chaaban J (2005) Public labeling revisited: the role of technological constraints under protected designation of origin regulation. Presented at the XIth European Association of Agricultural Economists Congress, Copenhagen, August 24–27Google Scholar
  6. Berthomeau J (2002) Comment mieux positionner les vins Français sur les marchés d’exportation? Ministère de l’Agriculture, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Bigot R (2002) La consommation ‘engagée’: mode passagère ou nouvelle tendance de la consommation? Les 4 pages des statistiques industrielles, SESSI, DIGITIP. Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances et de l’Industrie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Bombaron E (2005) Le torchon brûle en beaujolais. Le Figaro, August 12:4Google Scholar
  9. Bombrun H, Sumner DA (2003). What determines the price of wine? The value of grape characteristics and wine quality assessments. AIC Issues Brief 18, Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  10. Browne A, Harris P, Hofny-Collins A, Pasiecznik N, Wallace RY (2000) Organic production and ethical trade: definition, practice and links. Food Policy 25:69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bureau JC, Marette S, Schiavina A (1998) Non-tariff trade barriers and consumers’ information: the case of the EU-US trade dispute over beef. European Review of Agricultural Economics 25:437–462Google Scholar
  12. Clemens R (2005) Geographical indications, the WTO and Iowa-80 beef. Iowa Ag Review: 8–9Google Scholar
  13. Combris P, Lange C, Issanchou S (2003) Assessing the effect of information on the reservation price for champagne: what are consumers actually paying for? In: Ashenfelter O, Ginsburgh V (eds) The economics of wine. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Conan E (2005) Le prix de l’excellence. L’Express, September 5:48ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Consumer Reports (1997). Wine without fuss. 10–16.Google Scholar
  16. Consumers Union. Accessed December 20, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. Crespi JM, Marette S (2001) Politique de label et commerce international. Revue Economique 52:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crespi JM, Marette S (2003) ‘Does contain’ vs. ‘does not contain’: does it matter which GMO label is used? European Journal of Law and Economics 16:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Echikson W (2005) In Bordeaux, the price may not be right. Wall Street Journal, September: W5Google Scholar
  20. Economist (1999) The Globe in a Glass: A Survey of Wine, December 18th–30th: 97–115Google Scholar
  21. Economist (2003), Blended, January 25th 2003, p 61Google Scholar
  22. EEC (1992). Directives n. 2081/92 and n.2082/92 (L. 208), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  23. Enneking U (2004) Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31:205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finke MS (2000) Did the nutrition labeling and education act affect food choice in the United States? Presented at ‘The American Consumer and the Changing Structure of the Food System’, Economic Research Service, USDA, May 4–5, 2000, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher C, Aguilar F, Jawahar P, Sedjo R (2005) Forest certification: toward common standards? Resources for the Future 05-10, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. FLO (2005). Fairtrade Labelling Organization. Website available December 15, 2005. Scholar
  27. Germain S (2005) Le tournant stratégique du vin français. Les Echos, June 21:8Google Scholar
  28. Giraud-Heraud E, Soler LG, Tanguy H (2002) Concurrence internationale dans le secteur viticole: quel avenir au modèle d’appellation d’origine contrôlée? INRA-Sciences Sociales, no. 5–6/01, IvryGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes D, Lence S (2002) A new brand of agriculture: farmer-owned brand reward innovation. Choices, Fall:6–10Google Scholar
  30. Hayes D, Lence S, Stoppa A (2004) Farmer-owned brands? Agribusiness: An International Journal 20:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson R (1997) Technical measures for meat and other products in pacific basin countries. In: Orden D, Roberts D (eds) Understanding technical barriers to agricultural trade. The International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  32. Lecomte T (2003) Le pari du commerce equitable. Editions d’Organisation, ParisGoogle Scholar
  33. Linn A (2004). Starbucks smelling the coffee. Miami Herald, April 17Google Scholar
  34. Lohr L (1998) Welfare effects of eco-label proliferation: too much of a good thing. University of Georgia, AthensGoogle Scholar
  35. Lohr L, Krissoff B (2001) Consumer effect of harmonizing international standards for trade in organic foods. In: Krissoff B, Bohman M, Caswell JA (eds) Global food trade and consumer demand for quality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  36. Loisel JP, Couvreur A (2001) Les Français, la qualité de l’alimentation et l’information. Credoc INC, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. Loureiro ML, McCluskey JJ (2000) Assessing consumer response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness: An International Journal 16:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahé L (1997) Environment and quality standards in the WTO: new protectionism in agricultural trade? A European perspective. European Review of Agricultural Economics 24:480–503Google Scholar
  39. Marette S (2005) The collective-quality promotion in the agribusiness sector: an overview, CARD Working Paper 406Google Scholar
  40. Marette S, Crespi JM, Schiavina A (1999) The role of common labeling in a context of asymmetric information. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marette S, Crespi JM (2003) Can quality certification lead to stable cartel. Review of Industrial Organization 23:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marette S, Zago A (2003) Advertising, collective action and labelling in the European wine markets. Journal of Food Distribution Research 34:117–126Google Scholar
  43. Marsh V (2003a) BRL hardy soars after constellation talks. Financial Times, January 14Google Scholar
  44. Marsh V (2003b) Australia and US put case for new wine order. Financial Times, January 15Google Scholar
  45. McCluskey J, Loureiro M (2003) Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for food labeling: a discussion of empirical studies.’ Journal of Food Distribution Research 34:95–102Google Scholar
  46. Ndayisenga F, Kinsey J (1994) The structure of non-tariff trade measures on agricultural products in high-income countries. Agribusiness: An International Journal 10:275–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nimon W, Beghin J (1999) Ecolabels and international trade in the textile and apparel market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:1078–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (1999) Food safety and quality issues: trade considerations. Consultants’ report by J.C. Bureau, E. Gozlan, S. Marette. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  49. Peri C, Gaeta D (1999) Designations of origins and industry certifications as means of valorizing agricultural food products. In: Peri C, Gaeta D (eds) The European agro-food system and the challenge of global competition, Ismea, MilanGoogle Scholar
  50. Ribaut JC (2005) Peut-on encore garantir la qualité? Le Monde, June 17:23Google Scholar
  51. Roosen J, Lusk JL, Fox JA (2003) Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labeling strategies in France, Germany, and the UK. Agribusiness: An International Journal 19:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Runge C, Jackson L (1999) Labeling, trade and genetically modified organisms (GMOs): a proposed solution. Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy, University of Minnesota, St PaulGoogle Scholar
  53. Scarpa R, Philippidis G, Spalatro F (2005) Product-country images and preferences heterogeneity for mediterraean food products: a discrete choice framework. Agribusiness: An International Journal 21:329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stefani G, Romano D, Cavicchi A (2005) Size of region of origin and consumer willingness to pay for speciality foods: the case of Italian spelt. Mimeo, University of Florence, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  55. Sheldon I (2002) Regulation of biotechnology: will we ever ‘freely’ trade GMOs? European Review of Agricultural Economics 29:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaked A, Sutton J (1987) Product differentiation and industrial structure. Journal of Industrial Economics 36:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutton J (1991) Sunk costs and market structure. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Westgren R (1999) Delivering food safety, food quality, and sustainable production practices: the label rouge poultry system in France. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:1107–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. USTR (2005). United States Representative Executive Office of the President. United States and European Community reach agreement on Trade in Wine. September 15, 2005. Office of the United States Trade Representative, Washington DC, (accessed December 15, 2005)Google Scholar
  60. Whirthgen A (2005) Consumer, retailer, and producer assessments of product differentiation according to regional origin and process quality. Agribusiness: An International Journal 21:191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. WTO (2005) Panel reports out on geographical indications disputes. World Trade Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  62. Zago A, Pick D (2004) Labeling policies in food markets: private incentives, public intervention and welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29:150–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphan Marette
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics at INRAFrance’s National Institute for Agricultural ResearchFrance

Personalised recommendations