Advertisement

Eco-labeling and Strategic Rivalry in Export Markets

  • Arnab K. Basu
  • Nancy H. Chau
  • Ulrike Grote
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Export Market Trade Effect Import Competition Export Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review 91:877–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu AK, Chau NH (1998) Asymmetric country-of-origin effects on intra-industry trade and the international quality race. Review of Development Economics 2:140–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu AK, Chau NH (2001) Market access rivalry and eco-labeling standards: are eco-labels non-tariff barriers in disguise? Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper, Cornell University, WP 2001-15Google Scholar
  4. Basu AK, Chau NH, Grote U (2003) Eco-labeling and stages of development. Review of Development Economics 7:228–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu AK, Chau NH, Grote U (2004) On export rivalry, eco-labeling and the greening of agriculture. Agricultural Economics 31:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway T (1996) ISO 14000 standards and China: a trade and sustainable development perspective. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD); Prepared for the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, Working Group on Trade and Development (1996) China’s green food development and environmental protection. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/isochina.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:755–787MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1995) Trade and transboundary pollution. American Economic Review 85:716–737Google Scholar
  9. Cox DR (1972) Regression models with life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series 34:187–220MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean JM (2000) Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. CIES Policy Discussion Paper #0015, University of Adelaide, Centre for International Economic Studies, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixit A, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67:297–308Google Scholar
  12. FAO (2000) Food safety and quality as affected by organic farming. Paper (ERC/00/7) for the Twenty Second FAO Regional Conference for Europe in Porto, Portugal, 24–28 July 2000Google Scholar
  13. Frankel JA, Rose A (2002) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. NBER Working Papers no 9201 National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:353–77MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin DY, Wie LJ (1989) The robust inference for the cox proportional hazards. Model Journal of the American Statistical Association 84:1074–1078MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nimon W, Beghin J (1999) Are eco-labels valuable? Evidence from the apparel industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:801–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9:97–118Google Scholar
  19. Robins N, Sarah R (ed) (1997) Unlocking trade opportunities case studies of export success from developing countries. International Institute for Environment and Development for the UN Department of Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Shams R (1995) Eco-labelling and environmental policy efforts in developing countries. Intereconomics 30:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UNDP (1999) Human development database 11. UNDP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. UN (1997) Trade effects of eco-labelling. Proceedings of a seminar held in Bangkok 17–18 February, United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Willer H, Yussefi M (2001) Ökologische agrarkultur weltweit 2001. Stiftung Ökologie und Landbau, Bad DürkheimGoogle Scholar
  24. World Bank (2001) Trade and production database. The World Bank, Washington DC. http://www.worldbank.org/research/tradeGoogle Scholar
  25. World Bank (2001) World development indicators 2001. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnab K. Basu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nancy H. Chau
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ulrike Grote
    • 2
  1. 1.Economics and Public PolicyCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburg
  2. 2.Center for Development Research (ZEF)University of BonnBonn
  3. 3.Department of Applied Economics and ManagementCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations