Do Social Labeling NGOs Have Any Influence on Child Labor?

  • Sayan Chakrabarty
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

8 Conclusion

This study finds that improvement in the child’s and household’s welfare through the intervention of social labeling NGOs is an effective way of combating child labor at an individual level. One of the main factors which could influence the success of labeling NGOs is ‘monitoring frequency’.14 However, this study does not consider ‘monitoring frequency’ as an explanatory variable because of the high collinearity with ‘HH_IsAnybodyInLBLInd’ (Is anybody of the family working in a labeled industry?) and ‘Ind_NGOAssistChild’ (Is the child being helped by labeling NGO?). In the household level analysis, the most important variable is the number of the children under 14 years of age; a household with more children is much more likely to send a child to work than a household with less children. A combination of policies like labeling NGO’s welfare activities, birth control, access to formal credit market, increase of the adult income, and adult education could be suggested from this study to remove a child from the ‘work place’.


Child Labor Estimate Odds Ratio Kathmandu Valley Ethical Trade Trade Sanction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison PD (2003) Logistic regression using the SAS system theory and application. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu AK, Chau NH, Grote U (2006) Guaranteed manufactured without child labor: the economics of consumer boycotts, social labeling and trade sanctions. Review of Development Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  3. Basu A, Van H (1998) The economics of child labour. The American Economic Review 88:412–27Google Scholar
  4. Brown DK, Deardorff AV, Stern RM (1999) US trade and other policy options and programs to deter foreign exploitation of child labour. National Bureau of Economic Research Conference, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright K (1999) Child labor in Colombia. In: Grootaert C, Patrinos HA (eds) The policy analysis of child labor: a comparative study. St Martin’ s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. CBS (1997) Nepal living standard survey report 1996-main findings (volume two). Central Bureau of Statistics, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  7. CBS (1999) Report on the Nepal labour force survey 1988/99. Central Bureau of Statistics, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  8. CBS (1999) Nepal report on the Nepal labour force survey 1998/99. Central Bureau of Statistics, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  9. Charlé S (2001) Rescuing the ‘carpet kids’ of Nepal, India and Pakistan. Ford Foundation Report, SpringGoogle Scholar
  10. CUTS (2003) Child labour in south Asia. Consumer Unity & Trust Society, JaipurGoogle Scholar
  11. CWIN (1993) Misery behind the looms: child labourers in the carpet factories in Nepal. Child Workers in Nepal Concerned Centre, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman B Richard (1994) A hard-headed look at labour standards, ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N (2004) International trade and child Labor: cross-country evidence. NBER Working Papers 10317, National Bureau of Economic Research, IncGoogle Scholar
  14. Edmonds EV, Pavcnik, N (2005) The effect of trade liberalization on child labor. Journal of International Economics 65:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graner E (1999) Nepalese carpets: an analysis of export oriented production and labour markets. The Economic Journal of Nepal 22:201–217Google Scholar
  16. Grote U, Basu AK, Weinhold D (1998) Child labour and the international policy debate-the education/ child labor trade off and the consequences of trade sanctions. ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy No1, Center for Development Research, BonnGoogle Scholar
  17. Hemmer HR, Steger T, Wilhelm R (1996) Child labour in the light of recent economic development trends. International Labour Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilowitz J (1998) Labelling child labour products. International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour of the International Labour Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. Jafarey S, Lahiri S (2002) Will trade sanctions reduce child labour? The role of credit markets. Journal of Development Economics 68:137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar KCB, Govind G, Adhikari S (2002) Child labour in the Nepalese carpet sector: a rapid assessment. International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour of the International Labour Organization, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  21. Kish L (2004) Statistical design for research. John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy PS, Lemeshow S (1999) Sampling of populations-methods and applications. 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Linkenheil K (2003) Introduction of an appropriate labeling system for Nepal’s hand knotted carpet industry. Gesellschaft für technische Zusammenarbeit, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  24. Mansfield ER, Helms BP (1982) Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician 36:158–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maskus K (1997) Core labor standards: trade impacts and implications for international trade policy. World Bank International Trade Division, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Melchior A (1996) Child labor and trade policy. In: Grimsrud B, Melchior A (eds) Child labor and international trade policy, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Neumayer E, de Soysa I (2004) Trade openness, foreign direct investment and child labor. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  28. Patrinos HA, Psacharopoulos G (1997) Family size, schooling and child labor in Peru-an empirical analysis. Journal of Population Economics 10:387–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ray R (2000) Analysis of child labour in Peru and Pakistan: a comparative study. Journal of Population Economics 13:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ranjan P (1999) An economic analysis of child labor. Economics Letters 64:99–105MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenzweig MR (1982) Educational subsidy, agricultural development, and fertility change. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. RUGMARK (2004) RUGMARK Bulletin 2004. Nepal RUGMARK Foundation, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  33. Schultz TP (1997) Demand for children in low income countries. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics-Vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 349–430Google Scholar
  34. UNICEF (2003) Assessment of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding placement of child workers in school programmes and elimination of child labour in the Bangladesh garment industry (1995–2001). United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Wodon Q, Ravallion M (1999) Does child labour displace schooling: evidence on behavioral response to an enrollment subsidy. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sayan Chakrabarty
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Development ResearchUniversity of BonnGermany

Personalised recommendations