Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in Tourism Research: Theoretical Paradigms and Accountability

  • Chapter
Advances in Modern Tourism Research

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belkaoui, A. (1987). Inquiry and Accounting, Alternative Methods and Research Perspectives. New York, NY: Quorum books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berno, T. (1996). Cross-cultural research methods: content or context? A Cook Island example. In R. Butler and T. Hinch (Eds.). Tourism and indigenous peoples. London: International Thomson Business Press, pp. 376–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhasker, R. (1978). A realist theory of science, second edition. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhasker, R. (1982). Emergence, explanation and emancipation. In P. Secord, (Ed.). Explaining social behaviour: Consciousness, behaviour and social structure. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhasker, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhasker, R. (Ed.). (1990). Harré and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, E. (1995). Dilemmas of integrity and knowledge: Protocol in Aboriginal research. Paper presented at the Indigenous Research ethics, Townsville. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J. (Ed.) (1992) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Averbury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences: an introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R.Y., Delahaye, B.L. and U. Sekaran. (2001). Applied Business Research, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Milton, QLD, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1988). Traditions in the qualitative sociology of tourism.Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 15, pp. 29–46.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, J. and R. Hussey. (2003). Business Research, A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, 2nd edition. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (2000). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. Vol. 1. Translated by H. Martineau. Kitchener: Batoche books [URL:http: //www.ecn.bris.ac.uk/het/comte/philos1.pdf].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.R., and P.S. Schindler. (2003). Business Research Methods, 8th edition. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (2000). Business Research for Decision Making, 5th edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury, Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, G., Nash, D. and P. Pearce. (1988). Methodology in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 15, pp. 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echtner, C. and T. Jamal. (1997). The disciplinary dilemma of tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 24, pp. 868–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. (2000). Tourism and leisure research methods. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. (2003). Indigenous epistemology and Indigenous standpoint theory. Social Alternatives, Vol. 22, No. 1, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987).Chaos: making a new science. New York: Penguin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, L. and J. Phillimore. (2004). Qualitative research in tourism: ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In Guba, E. The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J.F. and J.A. Holstein. (2003). Postmodern sensibilities. In J.F. Gubrium and J.A. Holstein, (eds.). Postmodern interviewing.Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbenkian Commission. (1996). Open the social sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (1999). Qualitative Methods in Management Research, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F. Jr., Babin, B., Money, A.H. and Samouel, P. (2003). Essential of Business Research Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Milton Keyes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1981). The positive-empiricist approach and its alternative. In P. Reason and J. Rowan, (eds.), Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism: a rationale for the natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (n.d.). 1st, 2nd, 3rd wave. [URL:http://spider.georgetowncollege. edu/ ws/1st,–2nd,–3rd–wave.htm downloaded 17 February 2005.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinshead, K. (1996). The tourism researcher as bricoleur: the new wealth and diversity in qualitative inquiry. Tourism Analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitz, M. (1999). Culture, ethics, and participatory methodology in cross-cultural research. Australian Aboriginal Studies, No. 2, pp. 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, J. (1977). Editor’s Page. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 5, pp. 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, T. and K. Hollinshead. (2001). Tourism and the forbidden zone: the underserved power of qualitative inquiry. Tourism Management, Vol. 22, pp. 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, T. and K. Hollinshead. (2001). Tourism and the forbidden zone: the underserved power of qualitative inquiry. Tourism Management, Vol. 22, pp. 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, G.R. 2001. Tourism Research. Brisbane: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, G.R. (2003). Tourism research: Theoretical paradigms and accountability. Targeted Research: the gateway to accountability: TTRA 34th Annual Conference Proceedings [CD Rom], June 15–18, St Louis, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, G.R. (2004) Business Research, Examples of Theoretical paradigms that inform, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. and R. McTaggart. (1988). The action research planner, 3rd edition. Deakin University Press: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. and R. McTaggart. (2000). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 567–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiper, N. (1981). Towards a cohesive curriculum in tourism: the case for a distinct discipline. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems. In Lewin, K. (Ed.).Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S. and E.G. Guba. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. (2001). Basic marketing research: application to contemporary issues with SPSS - Student edition. Prentice - Hall.Source: http://www. superbookdeals. com /cgi - bin /moreinfo. cgi?page=desc&item=53577&bisac=Downloaded 05/08/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N.K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. and P. Oppenheim. (2002). Marketing research: An Applied Orientation, 2nd edition. Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G.A. (1998). Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKercher, B. (1999). A chaos approach to tourism. Tourism Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 425–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.B. (1976). Towards a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research, design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Time Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, G. and J. López. (2001). After postmodernism: the new millennium. In Potter, G. and J. López, (Eds.), After postmodernism: an introduction to critical realism. London: The Athlone Press, pp. 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeclawski, K. (1993). Tourism as the subject of interdisciplinary research. In Pearce, D. G. & R.W. Butler, (Eds.). Tourism research, critiques and challenges. London: Routledge, pp. 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, Peter. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin and Y S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 324–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., and E. Swartz. (1998). Doing Research in Business and Management, An Introduction to Process and Method. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R.W. and L.L. Love. (2000). The state of qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 164–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, B.W., Burns, P. and C. Palmer. (2005). Tourism Research Methods: Integrating theory with practice. London: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J.R.B. and C.R. Goeldner (Eds.). (1994). Travel, tourism and hospitality research, a handbook for managers and researchers, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research, a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Moshe, F. and I.R. Firstenberg. (1999). The minding organization: Bringing the future to the present and turn creative ideas into business solutions. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheurich, J.J. (1997). Research methods in the postmodern. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T.A. (2000). Three Epistemological Stances for Qualitative Inquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics, and Social Constructionism. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.).Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, P.J. (1990). Journals in tourism and hospitality. Journal of Tourism Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.L.J. (1995). Tourism analysis, 2nd edition. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies – research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield II, J.H. (1994). Ethnic modelling in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 175–188).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stear, L. (1981). Design of a curriculum for destination studies. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 19, pp. 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. and C. Teddlie. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Applied Social Science Research Methods Series, Vol. 46. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticehurst, G.Q. and A.J. Veal. (2000). Business Research Methods, A Managerial Approach. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Longman, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J. (1997). The Indiscipline of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 24, pp. 638–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J. (2001). Research paradigms and the tourism curriculum. Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 39, May, pp. 442–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (1996). Sociology of time and space. In Turner, B.S. (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, A.J. (1997). Research methods for leisure and tourism, a practical guide, 2nd edition. London: Pearson Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walle, A.H. (1997). Quantitative versus qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 524–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W.G. (2003) Business Research Methods, 7th edition. South Western, Cincinnati, OH: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Griffth University, Griffth Business School, Department of Tourism, Leisure, Hotel and Sport Management,, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia

    Gayle R. Jennings

Authors
  1. Gayle R. Jennings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Évora, Department of Economics, Urban and Regional Analysis and Research Laboratory, Largo dos Colegiais 2, Apartado 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal

    Álvaro Matias  & Paulo Neto  & 

  2. Free University, Department of Economics, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Peter Nijkamp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Physica-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jennings, G.R. (2007). Advances in Tourism Research: Theoretical Paradigms and Accountability. In: Matias, Á., Nijkamp, P., Neto, P. (eds) Advances in Modern Tourism Research. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1718-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation