Skip to main content

Operator related to a data matrix: a survey

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The reading of this article will allow the readers to understand the data analysis approach which is proposed. The first paragraph gives the basic tools: the triplet (X, Q, D), the operator related to a data matrix and the coefficient RV. The two following paragraphs show how these tools are used for reading out and solving the problems of joint analysis of several data matrices and of principal component analysis with respect to instrumental variables. The conclusion recalls of the construction of this approach along the past thirty five years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beh E.J (1997) Simple correspondence analysis of ordinal cross-clasifications using orthogonal polynolials. Biometrical Journal 39, 589–613

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonifas L, Escoufier Y, Gonzalez P.L, Sabatier R (1984) Choix de variables en analyse en composantes principales. Rev. Statistique Appliquée XXXII(2) 5–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Caillez F, Pages J.P (1976) Introduction á l’analyse des données SMASH, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chessel D, Dufour A.B, Thioulouse J (2004) The ade4 package — I: One-table methods. R News 4: 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cléroux R, Ducharme G (1989) Vector correlation for elliptical distribution. Comm. Stat. A, 18, 1441–1454.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cléroux R, Lazraq A, Lepage Y (1995) Vector correlation based on ranks and a nonparametric test of no association between vectors. Communications in Stat., 24, 713–733.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Ambra L, Beh E.J, Amenta P (2005) Catanova for two — way contingency tables with ordinal variables using orthogonal polynomials. Communications in statistics, theory and methods, 34, 1755–1770.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Durand J.F (1992) Additive spline discriminant analysis. In: Y. Dodge and J.C. Whittakers (eds) Computational Statistics, Heidelberg: Physica — Verlag, I, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Durand J.F (1993) Generalized principal component analysis with respect to instrumental variables via univariate spline transformations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 16, 423–440.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Escoufier Y (1970) Echantillonnage dans une population de variables aléatoires réelles. Publl. Inst.Statist. Univ. Paris 19,4, 1–47.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Escoufier Y (1973) Le traitement des variables vectorielles. Biometrics 29, 751–760.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Escoufier Y (1977) Operators related to a data matrix. In: J.R. Barra (ed) Recents developpements in Statistics: North — Holland Publishing Company, 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Escoufier Y (1980) Exploratory data analysis when data are matrices. In: K. Matusita (ed) Recent developments in Statistical inference and data analysis: North — Holland Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  14. Escoufier Y (1986) A propos du choix de variables en analyse des données. Metron XLIV, 31–47.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Escoufier Y (1987) The duality diagramm: a means of better practical applications. In: Legendre P. and Legendre L (eds) Development in numerical ecology, Nato ASI series, Vol.G14, Springer — Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Escoufier Y, L’Hermier H (1978) A propos de la comparaison graphique des matrices de variance. Biom.J. vol.20, 477–483.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Escoufier Y, Robert P (1979) Choosing variables and metrics by optimizing the RV — coefficient. In: Optimizing methods in Statistics: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Escoufier Y, Robert P, Cambon J (1974) Construction of a vector equivalent to a given vector from the point of view of the analysis of principal components: Compstat, Vienne.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fraile L, Escoufier Y, Raibaut A (1993) Analyse des correspondances de données planifiées: étude de la chémotaxie de la larve infestante d’un parasite. Biometrics 49, 1142–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes S (2006) Multivariate Statistics: The French Way In: D. Nolan and T. Speed (eds) Festschrift for David Freedman, IMS Lectures Notes — Monograph Series, Ohio. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Iman W, Abdelkbir S, Escoufier Y (1998) Quantification des effets spatiaux linéaires et non linéaires dans l’explication d’un tableau de données concernant la qualité des eaux souterraines. Rev. Statistique Appliquée, XLVI(3) 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lavit Ch (1988) Analyse conjointe des tableaux quantitatifs: Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lavit Ch, Escoufier Y, Sabatier R, Traissac P (1994) The ACT ( STATIS method). Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 18, 97–119.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazi-Aoual F, Hitier S, Sabatier R, Lebreton J.D (1995) Refined approximations to permutation tests for multivariate inference. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 20, 643–656.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao C.R (1965) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya A 26, 329–358

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert P, Escoufier Y (1976) A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV — coefficient. Appl.Statist. 25, 257–265

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabatier R, Vivien M (2004) A new linear method for analyzing four — way multibloks tables: STATIS — 4 submitted to Computational Statistics & Data analysis

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sabatier R, Jan Y, Escoufier Y (1984) Approximations d’applications linéaires et analyse en composantes principales In: E. Diday et al.(eds) Data Analysis and informatics III. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schlich P (1996) Defining and validating assessor compromises about product distances and attributes correlations. In: Naes T. and Risvik E (eds) Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science. Elesevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schlich P, Guichard E (1989) Selection and classification of volatile compounds of abricot using the RV coefficient. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 37, 142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vivien M, Sabatier R (2004) A generalization of STATIS — ACT strategy: Do ACT for multiblocks tables. Computational Statistics & data Analysis 46, 155–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Escoufier, Y. (2006). Operator related to a data matrix: a survey. In: Rizzi, A., Vichi, M. (eds) Compstat 2006 - Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1709-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics