Advertisement

Comment: Management of Industrial Transformation: Potentials and Limits from a Political Science Perspective

  • Klaus Jacob
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

Keywords

System Innovation Transition Management Policy Integration Ecological Modernisation Environmental Policy Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacob K. (2004): Governance for Industrial Transformation. The Scope of the Challenge. in: Jacob K., Binder M., and Wieczorek A. (eds.) (2004): Industrial Transormation between Ecological Modernisation and Structural Change, Environmental Policy research Centre, Berlin, 7–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacob K. and Volkery A. (2004): Institutions and Instruments for Government Self-Regulation: Environmental Policy Integration in a Cross-Country Perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 6(3), 291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kemp R. and Rotmans J. (2005): The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems. in: Weber/Hemmelskamp (2005, 33–55)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kemp R. and Loorbach D. (2003): Governance for Sustainability Through Transition Management. EAEPE 2003 Conference, 7–10 Nov. 2003, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loorbach D. (2002): Transition Management. Governance for Sustainability. Paper presented at the Conference Governance and Sustainability. New challenges for the state, business and civil society, 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2002, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J. (2006): Managing the Transition to Sustainable Development. In: Olshoorn X. and Wiezorek A.J., Understanding Industrial Transformation: Views from Different Disciplines. Springer, Heidelberg, 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nill J. (2004): Time Strategies of Transitions and the Transformed Role of Subsidies as Environmental Innovation Policy Instrument. in: Jacob K., Binder M., and Wieczorek A. (eds.) (2004): Industrial Transormation between Ecological Modernisation and Structural Change, Environmental Policy research Centre, Berlin, 255–307Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rotmans J., Kemp R., and Asselt M.v. (2001): More Evolution than Revolution. Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight 3(1), 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sabatier P.A. and Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1999): The Advocacy-Coalition Framework: An Assessment, In: Sabatier P.A.: Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sartorius, Ch. and Zundel (eds.) (2005). Time Strategies, Innovation and Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith A., Stirling A., and Berkhout F. (2005): The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions. In: Research Policy, Volume 34, Issue 10, 1491–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spaargaren G., Mol A.P.J., and Buttel F.H. (2006): Governing Environmental Flows. Global Challenges to Social Theory. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Jacob
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Policy Research CentreFreie Universität BerlinBerlin

Personalised recommendations