Environmental Innovation Policy. Is Steering Innovation Processes Possible?

  • René Kemp
  • Stefan Zundel
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)


Environmental Policy Technological Change Technical Change Transition Management Innovation Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arthur W.B. (1989): “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events”. Economic Journal, 99, 116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck U. (1997): “The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order”. Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckenbach F. (1992): “Ökologisch-Ökonomische Verteilungskonflikte” (Diskussionspapiere des I ÖW). Berlin, Institut für Ökologische WirtschaftsforschungGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bijker W.E. (1995): “Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change”. Cambridge, MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burrows M. (2001): “Just Transition,”. Alternatives Journal 27.1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    David P.A. (1985): “Clio and the Economics of Qwerty”. In: American Economic Review, Vol. 75(2), 332–337Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    David P.A. (1987): “Some new Standards for the Economics of Standardization in the Information Age”. In: Dasgupta P. and Stoneman P. (eds.): Economic policy and technological performance. Cambridge, MA, 206–239Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dirven J., Rotmans J. and Verkaik A.-P. (2002): “Samenleving in Transitie. Een Vernieuwend Gezichtspunt”. LNV, ICIS en Innovatienetwerk Groene Ruimte en Agrocluster, April 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dosi G. (1988): “The Nature of the Innovation Process”. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R.R., Silverberg G. and Soete L.L.G. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Downing P.B. and White L.J. (1986): “Innovation in Pollution Control”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13, 18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erdmann G. (1993): “Elemente einer evolutorischen Innovationstheorie”. Tübingen, Mohr Paul SiebeckGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freeman C. (1984): “Prometheus Unbound”. Futures 16(5), 494–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman C. and Perez C. (1988): “Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour”. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R.R., Silverberg G. and Soete L. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London, New York, Pinter PublishersGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freeman C. and Soete L. (1997): “The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition)”. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frencken K. and Verbart O. (1998): “Simulating Paradigm Shifts Using a Lock-in Model”. In: Ahrweiler P. and Gilbert N. (eds.): Computer Simulations in Science and Technology, Berlin, Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geels F.W. (2002): “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-study”. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grunwald A. (2000): “Technology Policy between Long-term Planning Requirements and Short-ranged Acceptance Problems. New Challenges for Technology Assessment”. In: Grin J. and Grunwald A. (eds.): Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology assessment. Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer, 99–148Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayek F.A. (1969): “Freiburger Studien”. TübingenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoogma R., Kemp R., Schot J. and Truffler B. (2002): “Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management”. London, SPON PressGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kemp R. and Soete L. (1992): “The Greening of Technological Progress: An Evolutionary Perspective”. Futures 24(5), 437–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kemp R. (1994): “Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability. The Problem of Technological Regime Shifts”. Futures 26(10), 1023–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kemp R. (1997): “Environmental Policy and Technical Change. A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments”. Cheltenham, Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kemp R., Schot J., and Hoogma R. (1998): “Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation. The Approach of Strategic Niche Management”. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kemp R. (2000): “Technology and Environmental Policy. Innovation Effects of Past Policies and Suggestions for Improvement”. OECD proceedings Innovation and the Environment, Paris, OECD, 35–61Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kemp R. (2001a): “Opportunities for a Green Industrial Policy from an Evolutionary Technology Perspective”. In: Binder M., Jänicke M. and Petschow U. (eds.): Green Industrial Restructuring, Berlin etc., Springer, 151–169Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kemp R. and Rotmans J. (2005): “The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental, and Social Systems”. In: Weber M. and Hemmelskamp J. (eds.) (2005): Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Heidelberg/New York, Springer Verlag, 33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kemp R. and Loorbach D. (2003): “Governance for Sustainability Through Transition Management”. Paper for EAEPE 2003 Conference, November 7–10, 2003, Maastricht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kenny M. and Meadowcroft J. (1997): “Planning Sustainability”. London and NY, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee K.N. (1993): “Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment”. Washington D.C., Island PressGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1995): “Democratic Governance”. The Free Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mayntz R. (1994): “Governing Failures and the Problem of Governability: Some Comments on a Theoretical Paradigm”. In: Kooiman J. (ed.): Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions, Sage, London, 9–20Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Milliman S. and Prince R. (1989): “Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nelson R.R. and Winter S.G. (1982): “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”. Cambridge, Bellknap Press of Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nelson R.R. (1987): “Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process”. Amsterdam, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nill J. (2002): “Wann benötigt Umwelt(innovations)politik politische Zeitfenster? Zur Fruchtbarkeit und Anwendbarkeit von Kingdons “policy window”-Konzept”. (Diskussionspapiere des I ÖW54/02), Berlin, Institut für Ökologische WirtschaftsforschungGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nill J. (2005): “Techno-Political Competition and Lock-in: The Case of Nuclear Power Technologies”. In: Zundel S. and Sartorius C. (eds.) (2005): Time Strategies for Innovation Policy Towards Sustainability. Cheltenham (UK), Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    NMP-4 (2000): “Een Wereld en een Wil. Werken aan Duurzaamheid”. (A World and a Will. Working towards Sustainability), The HagueGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Perez C. and Soete L. (1988): “Catching up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity”. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G. and Soete L. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London, Pinter Publishers, 458–95Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reichel M. (1998): “Markteinführung von erneuerbarer Energie. Lock-out Effekte und innovationspolitische Konsequenzen für elektrische Wind-und Solarenergienutzung”. Wiesbaden, Deutscher Univ.-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rip A. and Kemp R. (1998): “Technological Change”. In: Rayner S. and Malone L. (eds.): Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2 Resources and Technology. Batelle Press, Washington D.C., 327–399Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M., Geels F., Verbong G., and Molendijk K. (2000): “Transities & Transitiemanagement. De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening”. Final report of study “Transitions and Transition management” for the 4th National Environmental Policy Plan (NMP-4) of the Netherlands, October 2000, ICIS & MERIT, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rotmans J., Kemp R., and van Asselt M. (2001): “More Evolution than Revolution. Transition Management in Public Policy”. Foresight 3(1), 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sartorius C. (2003): “Second-order Sustainability — the Conditions for a Sustainable Technology Development in a Dynamic Environment”. Ecological Economics 58/2 (2006), pp 268–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sartorius C. (2005a): “Combined-cycle Gas Turbines — Between Climate Protection and other Policy Objectives”. In: Zundel S. and Sartorius C. (2005) (eds.): Time Strategies for Innovation Policy Towards Sustainability. Cheltenham (UK), Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sartorius C. (2005b): “Stationary Fuel Cells and the Decentralized Cogeneration of Power and Heat”. In: Zundel S. and Sartorius C. (eds.) (2005): Time Strategies for Innovation Policy Towards Sustainability. Cheltenham (UK), Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sartorius C. (2005c): “Phase-Out of CFCs and the Protection of the Ozone Layer”. In: Zundel S. and Sartorius C. (eds.) (2005): Time Strategies for Innovation Policy Towards Sustainability. Cheltenham (UK), Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Soete L. and Zundel S. (1993): “Ökologische Verteilungskonflikte”. Literaturstudie im Auftrag der Hans-Böckler-StiftungGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Riele T. et al. (2000): “Transities: kunnen drie Mensen de Wereld Doen Omslaan?”. STORRM, Twynstra Gudde Management, and Hötte Milieu ManagementGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Windrum P. (2003): “Unlocking a Lock-in: Towards a Model of Technological Succession”. In: Saviotti P.P.: Applied Evolutionary Economics — New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton US., Edward Elgar, 292–321Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zimmermann K. (1986): “Discussion: Distributional Considerations and the Environmental Policy Process”. In: Schnaiberg et al. (ed.): Distributional Conflicts in Environmental Resource Policy, 95–108Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zundel S. and Sartorius C. (eds.) (2005): “Time Strategies for Innovation Policy Towards Sustainability”. Cheltenham (UK), Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Kemp
    • 1
  • Stefan Zundel
    • 2
  1. 1.Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT)United Nations UniversityMaastricht
  2. 2.Department for Informatics, Mechanical Electrical Engineering and EconomicsUniversity of Applied Sciences LausitzSenftenberg

Personalised recommendations