Advertisement

Drugs, driving, and models to measure driving impairment

  • Katherine Owens
  • Johannes G. Ramaekers

Abstract

Research into the effects of various drugs on driving performance is becoming more important as epidemiological studies indicate that the incidence of drugs in drivers is increasing. Considering that this type of research is likely to guide laws and behaviours, it is important that the tests being used to determine whether certain drugs are impairing are sensitive, valid and reliable. This chapter presents the most common tests used in research to evaluate behaviours relating to driving. The research varies from the use of simple cognitive tasks, to simulators, and to driving in real traffic. The findings suggest that there are limitations to various methods of testing; however, considerations and precautions can be taken to ensure that we measure relevant processes and use sensitive tests for drug impairment.

Keywords

Crash Risk UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ Critical Tracking Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Michon JA (1985) A critical view of driver behaviour models: what do we know what should we do? In Evans L, Schwing, R. (Eds.) Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Hanlon JF (1984) Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 18: S121–S132Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robbe H (1998) Marijuana’s impairing effects on driving are moderate when taken alone but severe when combined with alcohol. Human Psychopharmacology, 13, S70–S78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuypers KPC, Samyn N, Ramaekers, JG (2006) MDMA and alcohol effects, combined and alone, on objective and subjective measures of actual driving performance and psychomotor function. Psychopharmacology, 187, 467–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramaekers JG, Kuyers KPC, Samyn N (2006) Stimulant effects of 3-4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) 75 mg and methylphenidate 20 mg on actual driving during intoxication and withdrawal. Addiction, 101, 1614–1621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamers CT, Ramaekers JG, Muntjewerff ND, Sikkema KL, Samyn N, Read NL, Brookhuis KA, Riedel WJ (2003) Dissociable effects of a single dose of ecstasy (MDMA) on psychomotor skills and attentional performance. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 17(4): 379–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamers CTJ, Ramaekers JG (2001) Visual Search and urban driving under the influence of marijuana and alcohol. Human Psychopharmacology, 16, 393–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brookhuis K, De Waard D, Mulder B (1994) Measuring driving performance by car following in traffic. Ergonomics, 37, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tharp V, Burns M, Moskowitz H (1981). Development and Field Test of Psychological Test for DWI Arrest. U.S. Department of Transport, National Highway Safety Administration, Final Report. Publication No. DOT-HS-805-864.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Compton RP (1985) Pilot test of selected DWI detection procedures for use at sobriety checkpoints. Washington, US department of transportation.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burns M, Anderson EW (1995) A Colorado validation study of the standardized field sobriety test (SFST) battery. Final report submitted to Colorado Department of Transportation, November, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuster JW, Burns M (1998) Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at BACs below 0.10 percent. Final report. U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Anacapa Sciences, Inc, California.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papafotiou K, Carter JD, Stough C (2005) The relationship between performance on the standardised field sobriety tests, driving performance and the level of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in blood. Forensic Science International, 20: 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papafotiou K, Carter JD, Stough C (2005) An evaluation of the sensitivity of the Standardised Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) to detect impairment due to marijuana intoxication. Psychopharmacology, 180: 107–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shallice T (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London., 199–209Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veale DM, Sahakian BJ, Owen AM, Marks IM (1996) Specific cognitive deficits in tests sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine 26: 1261–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robbe H (1994) Marijuana use and driving. Journal of the International Hemp Association, 1: 44–48Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silber BY, Papafotiou K, Croft RJ, Ogden E, Swann P, Stough C (2005) The effects of dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance. Psychopharmacology, 179, 536–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krueger HP, Vollrath (2000). Effects of cannabis and amphetamines on driving simulator performance on recreational drug users in the natural field. In alcohol drugs and traffic Safety. Proceedings of the 15 th International conference on Alcohol Drugs and Traffic Safety, May 21-26, 2000. Stockholm, Sweden. Laurell H, Schlyter F (Eds).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brookhuis K, De Waard D, Samyn N (2004) Effects of MDMA (ecstasy), and multiple drugs use on (simulated) driving performance and traffic safety. Psychopharmacology, 173, 440–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramaekers JG (2003) Antidepressants and driver impairment: empirical evidence from a standard on-the-road test. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 20–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kline P (1999) Handbook of psychological testing. Taylor & Francis Group, Cornwall.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anastasi A, Urbina S (2006) Psychological testing. Fordham University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ICADTS working group (1999) Guidelines on experimental studies undertaken to determine a medicinal drug’s effect on driving or skills related to driving.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Louwerens JW, Gloerich ABM, de Vries G, Brookhuis KA, O’Hanlon JF (1987) The relationship between drivers’ blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and actual driving performance during high speed travel. Alcohol, Drugs Traffic Safety, 86: 183–186.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borkenstein (1978) Role of alcohol in accident etiology Ç Die Rolle des Alkohols in der Unfallätiologie. Hefte zur Unfallheilkunde, 130, 191–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Laar MW, Volkerts ER, Van Willigenburg APP (1992) Therapeutic effects and effects on actual driving performance of chronically administered buspirone and diazepam in anxious outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12: 86–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neutel CI (1995) Risk of traffic accident injury after a prescription for a benzodiazepine. Annals of Epidemiology, 5: 239–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhéuser Verlag/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Owens
    • 1
  • Johannes G. Ramaekers
    • 2
  1. 1.Katherine Owens (nee Papafotiou)Road Safety and Drug Use Unit, Ipsos-Eureka Social Research InstituteMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Dept of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and NeurosciencesMaastricht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations