Advertisement

Gravitational Lensing by Elliptical Galaxies, and the Schwarz Function

  • C.D. Fassnacht
  • C.R. Keeton
  • D. Khavinson
Part of the Trends in Mathematics book series (TM)

Abstract

We discuss gravitational lensing by elliptical galaxies with some particular mass distributions. Using simple techniques from the theory of quadrature domains and the Schwarz function (cf. [18]) we show that when the mass density is constant on confocal ellipses, the total number of lensed images of a point source cannot exceed 5 (4 bright images and 1 dim image). Also, using the Dive-Nikliborc converse of the celebrated Newton’s theorem concerning the potentials of ellipsoids, we show that “Einstein rings” must always be either circles (in the absence of a tidal shear), or ellipses.

Keywords

Elliptical Galaxy Bright Image Quadrature Domain Gravitational Lens Point Light Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. An and N.W. Evans. The Chang-Refsdal lens revisited. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 369:317–334, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W.L. Burke. Multiple gravitational imaging by distributed masses. Astrophys. J., 244:L1, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ph. Griffiths and J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. Gustafsson and H.S. Shapiro. What is a quadrature domain? In Quadrature domains and their applications, volume 156 of Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., pages 1–25. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ch. Keeton, S. Mao, and H.J. Witt. Gravitational lenses with more than four images, I. classification of caustics. Astrophys. J., pages 697–707, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ch. Keeton and J. Winn. The quintuple quasar: Mass models and interpretation. Astrophys. J., 590:39–51, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Khavinson. Holomorphic partial differential equations and classical potential theory. Universidad de La Laguna, Departamento de Análisis Matemático, La Laguna, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Khavinson and G. Neumann. On the number of zeros of certain rational harmonic functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 134(4):1077–1085 (electronic), 2006.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Khavinson and G. Neumann. From the fundamental theorem of algebra to astrophysics: a “harmonious” path, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 55, Issue 6, 2008, 666–675.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Khavinson and G. Światek. On the number of zeros of certain harmonic polynomials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 131(2):409–414 (electronic), 2003.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Mao, A.O. Petters, and H.J. Witt. Properties of point-mass lenses on a regular polygon and the problem of maximum number of images. In T. Piron, editor, Proc. of the eighth Marcell Grossman Meeting on General Relativity (Jerusalem, Israel, 1977), pages 1494–1496. World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Narayan and B. Bartelman. Lectures on gravitational lensing. In Proceedings of the 1995 Jerusalem Winter School, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~narayan/papers/JeruLect.ps, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A.O. Petters. Morse theory and gravitational microlensing. J. Math. Phys., 33:1915–1931, 1992.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.O. Petters, H. Levine, and J. Wambsganss. Singularity Theory and Gravitational Lensing. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S.H. Rhie. Can a gravitational quadruple lens produce 17 images? www.arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0103463, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    S.H. Rhie. n-point gravitational lenses with 5n-5 images, www.arxiv.org/pdf/astroph/0305166, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Sauer. Nova Geminorum of 1912 and the origin of the idea of gravitational lensing, lanl.arxiv.org/pdf/0704.0963, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    H.S. Shapiro. The Schwarz function and its generalization to higher dimensions, volume 9 of University of Arkansas Lecture Notes in the Mathematical Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Straumann. Complex formulation of lensing theory and applications. Helvetica Phys. Acta, arXiv:astro-ph/9703103, 70:896–908, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ch. Turner. The early history of gravitational lensing, www.nd.edu/~/turner.pdf, 2006.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Wambsganss. Gravitational lensing in astronomy. Living Rev. Relativity, www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-12, 1:74 pgs., 1998. Last amended: 31 Aug. 2001Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Wilmhurst. The valence of harmonic polynomials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 126:2077–2081, 1998.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. Winn, Ch. Kochanek, Ch. Keeton, and J. Lovell. The quintuple quasar: Radio and optical observations. Astrophys. J., 590:26–38, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. J. Witt. Investigations of high amplification events in light curves of gravitationally lensed quasars. Astron. Astrophys., 236:311–322, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.D. Fassnacht
    • 1
  • C.R. Keeton
    • 2
  • D. Khavinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of California at DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics & StatisticsUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations