Abstract
The question of the nature of change in the development of mathematics was systematically discussed for the first time in the second half of the nineteenth century in connection with the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries. This discussion was evidence of a fundamental change in the perception of mathematics. Even at the beginning of the eighteenth century it was still common for mathematicians to try to give legitimacy to, and to underline the importance of, their discoveries by ascribing them to ancient authorities. In doing so they implicitly assumed that mathematical theorems express eternal and permanent truths and thus a discovery is only an incidental event when someone becomes aware of these eternal truths. This strategy of ascribing his own discoveries to ancient authors was used even by Newton. According to the testimony of Nicolas Facio de Drivillier, Newton was convinced that all important theorems of his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica were known already to Plato and Pythagoras (Rattansi 1993, p. 239).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Birkhäuser Verlag AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Introduction. In: Patterns of Change. Science Networks. Historical Studies, vol 36. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8840-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8840-9_1
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-8839-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-7643-8840-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)