Skip to main content

Roaming Point Perspective: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Visual Refinements of the Greek Doric Temple

  • Chapter
Nexus Network Journal

Part of the book series: Nexus Network Journal ((NNJ,volume 10,2))

  • 971 Accesses

Abstract

Writers, artists, and mathematicians since Vitruvius have attributed the use of the visual refinements as a means by which the Greek builders optically corrected the form of the Doric temple. This study proposes an interpretation in which the visual refinements of the Parthenon are considered from a non-stationary, or “roaming”, point of view. The mathematics of this type of visual space reveals a dynamic zone in which objects visually increase and decrease simultaneously, a behavior consistent with conditions addressed by the visual refinements of the Parthenon.

The Greeks created a plastic system by forcibly affecting our senses. … They employed the most delicate distortions, applying to their contours an impeccable adjustment to the laws of optics. Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture

Michael C. Duddy is a founding principal of Designgroup International, an architectural practice with offices in New York and Shanghai specializing in urban mixed-use buildings. He is currently researching aspects of the history of the relationship between the built environment and the disciplines of epistemology and metaphysics. He is a guest critic at the School of Visual Arts in New York City.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberti, Leon Battista 1988. On the Art of Building in Ten Books. Joseph Rykwert, Neil Leach and Robert Tavernor, trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownson, C. D. 1980. Euclid’s Optics and its Compatibility with Linear Perspective. Thesis? University of California at Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, William Bell. 1974. The Design and Building Techniques of the Parthenon — 1951. Pp. 171–199 in The Parthenon, Vincent J. Bruno, ed. New York: W W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, James. 1994. The Poetics of Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Banister. 1967. A History of Architecture on a Comparative Method. 17th ed. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1983. Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Morris 1970. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1954. Mathematics in Western Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körnigsberger, Leo. 1906. Hermann von Helmholtz. Frances A Welby, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A.W. 1973. Greek Architecture. 3rd ed. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corbusier . 1970. Towards a New Architecture. Frederick Etchells, trans. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luneburg, Rudolph K. 1947. Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrikios, A. 1974. Aesthetic Analysis Concerning the Curvature of the Parthenon. Pp. 199–224 in The Parthenon, Vincent J. Bruno, ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, Erwin. 1991. Perspective as Symbolic For. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrault, Claude. 1993. Ordonnance for the Five Kinds of Columns after the Method of the Ancients. Santa Monica, CA: The Getty Center for the Art and the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Robin Francis 1995. Architecture and Meaning in the Athenian Acropolis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Vincent. 1991. Architecture: The Natural and the Manmade. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serlio, Sebastiano. 1982. The Five Books of Architecture. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitruvius . 1960. The Ten Books of Architecture. Morris Hickey Morgan, trans. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stephen R. Wassell Kim Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Kim Williams Books, Turin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duddy, M.C. (2008). Roaming Point Perspective: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Visual Refinements of the Greek Doric Temple. In: Wassell, S.R., Williams, K. (eds) Nexus Network Journal. Nexus Network Journal, vol 10,2. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8766-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics