Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Milestones in Drug Therapy ((MDT))

  • 1449 Accesses

Abstract

Recombinant DNA technology and hybridoma techniques enabled the development of therapeutic proteins such as the interferons (IFN), erythropoietin (EPO), insulin, growth hormones, cytokines, and monoclonal antibodies [1]. These proteins have revolutionised the treatment of many diseases, including, cancer, hepatitis, and multiple sclerosis. The patents of the first generation of biopharmaceuticals have expired or are about to expire, which enables marketing of noninnovator versions of these products, named ‘biosimilars’ in the European Union (EU), and ‘follow-on protein products’ in the USA. The EU has established a legal and regulatory framework for acquiring a marketing authorisation for biosimilars to market [29], while in the United States the regulatory pathway is still being developed[10].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avidor Y, Mabjeesh NJ, Matzkin H. Biotechnology and drug discovery: from bench to bedside. South Med J 2003; 96: 1174–1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. Offical Journal of the European Union Vol 47; 2004: 34–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products 2005. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/043704en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Quality issues. 2006 Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/4934805en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant erythropoie. Trends Neurosci 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/9452605en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing somatropin. 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu./pdfs/human/biosimilar/9452805en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant human insulin. 2006. A Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/3277505en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/3132905en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/biosimilar/4283205en.pdf (Accessed 1 May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. US FDA. Omnitrope (somatropin [rDNA origin]) questions and answers 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/somatropin/qa.htm. (Accessed 3 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crommelin DJ, Bermejo T, Bissig M et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of biosimilars: important differences from generic low-molecular weight pharm. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci 2005;1:11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roger SD. Biosimilars: how similar or dissimilar are they? Nephrology (Carlton) 2006;11:341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schellekens H. Follow-on biologics: challenges of the ‘next generation’. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20: v31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chirino AJ, Mire-Sluis A. Characterizing biological products and assessing comparability following manufacturing changes. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:1383–1391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Locatelli F, Roger S. Comparative testing and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21 Suppl 5:v13–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kessler M, Goldsmith D, Schellekens H. Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21 Suppl 5:v9–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schellekens H. Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20:vi3–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiecek A, Mikhail A. European regulatory guidelines for biosimilars. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21 Suppl 5:v17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Omnitrope. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/human-docs/PDFs/EPAR/Omnitrope/H-607-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Valtropin. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/human-docs/PDFs/EPAR/valtropin/H-602-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abseamed. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/human-docs/PDFs/EPAR/abseamed/H-727-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Binocrit. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/human-docs/PDFs/EPAR/binocrit/H-725-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epoetin alfa Hexal. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/epoetinalfahexal/H-726-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silapo. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/human-docs/PDFs/EPAR/silapo/H-760-PI-en.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bennett CL, Luminari S, Nissenson AR et al. Pure red-cell aplasia and epoetin therapy. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1403–1408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Casadevall N, Eckardt KU, Rossert J. Epoetin-induced autoimmune pure red cell aplasia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16 Suppl 1:S67–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Casadevall N, Rossert J. Importance of biologic follow-ons: experience with EPO. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2005;18:381–387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schellekens H. Immunologic mechanisms of EPO-associated pure red cell aplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2005;18:473–480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hermeling S, Schellekens H, Crommelin DJ et al. Micelle-associated protein in epoetin formulations: a risk factor for immunogenicity? Pharmacol Res 2003;20:1903–1907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schellekens H, Jiskoot W. Eprex-associated pure red cell aplasia and leachates. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:613–614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Louet S. Lessons from Eprex for biogeneric firms. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:956–957.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Villalobos AP, Gunturi SR, Heavner GA. Interaction of polysorbate 80 with erythropoietin: a case study in protein-surfactant interactions. Pharmacol Res 2005;22:1186–1194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Boven K, Knight J, Bader F et al. Epoetin-associated pure red cell aplasia in patients with chronic kidney disease: solving the mystery. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20 Suppl 3:iii33–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. European Medicines Agency. Omnitrope: EPAR summary for the public 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/Omnitrope/060706en1.pdf. (Accessed 3 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. European Medicines Agency. Valtropin: EPAR summary for the public 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/valtropin/H-602-en1.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. European Medicines Agency. Retacrit: EPAR summary for the public 2008. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/retacrit/H-872-en1.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. European Medicines Agency. Silapo: EPAR summary for the public 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/silapo/H-760-en1.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  38. European Medicines Agency. Epoetin alfa Hexal: EPAR summary for the public 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/epoetinalfahexal/H-726-en1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  39. European Medicines Agency. Binocrit: EPAR summary for the public 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/binocrit/H-725-en1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  40. European Medicines Agency. Abseamed: EPAR summary for the public 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/abseamed/H-727-en1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  41. European Medicines Agency. Omnitrope: scientific discussion 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/Omnitrope/060706en6.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith N. EMEA “will not guarantee” that biosimilars are interchangeable with originator. APM Health Europe 2006. Available at: http://health.apmnews.com/story.php?mots=BIOSIMILAR &searchScope=1&searchType=0&depsPage=2&numero=L3250 (Accessed 1 May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on recommendation for refusal of marketing application for Alpheon 2006. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/opinion/19089606en.pdf. (Accessed 3 March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mellstedt H, Niederwieser D, Ludwig H. The challenge of biosimilars. Ann Oncol 2008;19:411–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schellekens H. Biosimilar epoetins: how similar are they? EJHP 2004;3:243–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schellekens, H. (2009). Biosimilar epoetins. In: Elliott, S.G., Foote, M.A., Molineux, G. (eds) Erythropoietins, Erythropoietic Factors, and Erythropoiesis. Milestones in Drug Therapy. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8698-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics