Identification of morphological, biochemical and physiological parameters for characterizing nutritional stress status in arboreous species differently tolerant to chlorosis

  • Silvia Donnini
  • Graziano Zocchi
  • Antonella Castagna
  • Chedley Abdelly
  • Annamaria Ranieri


Lime-induced chlorosis is one of the major abiotic stresses affecting fruit tree crops in the Mediterranean area. However, fruit tree species have been the object of only few studies and the results obtained are insufficient to supply parameters for breeding. Here we report the results of a study carried out to identify morphological and biochemical modifications induced by low iron availability and a high level of bicarbonate in the medium in pear (cv Conference; tolerant genotype) and quince rootstocks (MA and BA29; susceptible genotypes) cultured by in vitro and hydroponic culture. Morphological parameters of in vitro plantlets were differently influenced by the two stress conditions depending on plant genotype and parameter analyzed, and suggested that the pear cv carried out an adaptive strategy to warrant sufficient iron supply, whereas the two quince root-stocks failed to adapt to conditions typical of calcareous soil. The strong and generalized reduction in chlorophyll and carotenoid content observed only in quince plantlets suggests a down-regulation of the whole chloroplast machinery in iron-deficient quince. Measurement of Fe(III)-chelate reductase activity (FCR) of rooted cuttings from in vitro culture grown in hydroponic solution suggests the probable involvement of enhanced FCR activity in the major tolerance of cv Conference to iron chlorosis. Cv Conference was also less sensitive to bicarbonate supply than quince rootstocks in terms of reduction of leaf pigment content and activation of the photoprotective xanthophyll cycle. In conclusion, this study shows that the mechanisms of differential Fe efficiency are associated to differences in leaf pigment content and photoprotective process and that in vitro culture could be a valid technique to test rootstock susceptibility to iron chlorosis.


Iron Deficiency Carotenoid Content Xanthophyll Cycle Tolerant Genotype Iron Chlorosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tagliavini M, Rombolà AD (2001) Iron deficiency and chlorosis in orchard and vineyard ecosystems-A review. Eur J Agron 15: 71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wallace A (1984) Effect of liming of soil on additive, synergistic and protective interactions of some multiple trace element combinations and on iron and calcium interactions for dicot and monocot plant species. J Plant Nutr 7: 595–601Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Socias i Company R, GomezAparisi J, Felipe AJ (1995) A genetical approach to iron chlorosis in deciduous fruit trees. In: J Abadía (ed): Iron nutrition in soil and plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 167–174Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vizzotto G, Pinton R, Bomben C, Cesco S, Varanini Z, Costa G (1999) Iron reduction in iron stressed plants of Actinidia deliciosa genotypes: Involvement of PM Fe(III)-chelate reduc-tase and H+-ATPase activity. J Plant Nutr 22: 479–488Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brancadoro L, Rabotti G, Scienza A, Zocchi G (1995) Mechanisms of Fe-efficiency in roots of vitis spp. in response to iron deficiency. Plant Soil 171: 229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terry N, Abadia J (1986) Function of iron chloroplasts. J Plant Nutr 9: 609–646Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferraro F, Castagna A, Soldatini GF, Ranieri A (2003) Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.) T3238FER and T3238fer genotypes. Influence of different iron concentrations on thylakoid pigment and protein composition. Plant Sci 164: 783–CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abadia J (1992) Leaf responses to Fe deficiency: A review. J Plant Nutr 15:1669–1713Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morales F, Abadia A, Abadia J (1990) Characterization of the xanthophylls cycle and other photosynthetic pigment changes induced by iron deficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Physiol 94: 607–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Römheld V, Marschner H (1986) Mobilization of iron in the rhizosphere of different plant species. Adv Plant Nutr 2: 155–204Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (1996) The role of xanthophylls cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trend Plant Sci 1: 21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 437–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaney RL, Brown JC, Tiffin O (1972) Obligatory reduction of ferric chelates in iron uptake by soybeans. Plant Physiol 81: 208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castagna A, Nali C, Ciompi S, Lorenzini G, Soldatini GF, Ranieri A (2001) Ozone exposure affects photosynthesis of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) plants. New Phytol 152: 223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Donnini
    • 1
  • Graziano Zocchi
    • 1
  • Antonella Castagna
    • 2
  • Chedley Abdelly
    • 3
  • Annamaria Ranieri
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Produzione VegetaleMilan UniversityMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Chimica e Biotecnologie AgrariePisa UniversityPisaItaly
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Adaptation des Plantes aux Stress AbiotiquesCentre de Biotechnologie du Technopole de Borj- CédriaHammam- LifTunisia

Personalised recommendations