Advertisement

Salinity influence on soil microbial population metabolism and enzymatic activities in lysimeter-grown Olea europaea and Nicotiana glauca

  • Adalgisa Belligno
  • Marco Russo
  • Vito Sardo
  • Ju Ying Wu
Conference paper

Abstract

Since soil microorganisms are quite sensitive to changes in their habitat, their response in terms of selected metabolic and enzymatic activities was investigated as a possible indicator of the effects of saline irrigation in lysimeter-grown plants of Olea europea and Nicotiana glauca. Water electrical conductivity ranged from 0.8 dS/m in the control to 8.9,17.5, and 26.2 dS/m in treatments with 20%, 40% and 60% diluted seawater, respectively. While some results were non-significant, the following main conclusions could be drawn: Microbial biomass carbon, soluble soil carbon and respiration activity were not significantly correlated to salinity. In addition, the microbial biomass nitrogen was not correlated to salinity. Contrary to this, enzyme activities as shown by hydrolysis rate of fluorescein diacetate (FDA), acid and alkaline phosphatase, and β-glucosidase decreased consistently with salinity without any significant difference between the two plant species. FDA gave the most sensitive and consistent response.

Keywords

Microbial Biomass Acid Phosphatase Microbial Biomass Carbon Fluorescein Diacetate Microbial Biomass Nitrogen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schnurer J, Rosswall T (1990) Hydrolysis fluorescein diacetate as a measure of total micro-bial activity in soil and litter applied and environmental microbiology. Soil Biol Biochem 21: 1256–1261Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sparling GP, Ord BG, Vaughan D (1981) Microbial biomass and activity in soil amended with glucose. Soil Biol Biochem 13: 99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenkinson DS (1981) The fate of plant and animal residues in soil. In: DJ Greenland, MHB Hayes (eds): The chemistry of soil processing. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: Measurement and turnover. In: Soil Biochemistry, vol. 5. Marcel Dekker, New York, 415–471Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sardo V (1999) Establishment of an experimental field for saline irrigation in Sicily. In: A Hamdy et al. (eds): Halophyte uses in different climates. Backhuys, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    LaLoggia F, Pennisi M, Sardo V (1996) Hargreaves-Samani method and evaporation pan in the estimation of reference evapotranspiration. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Chania, CreteGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. Method of soil analysis. II. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA Book Series no. 5: 775–833Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sparling GP, West AW (1988) Modification of the fumigation-extraction technique to permit simultaneous extraction and estimation of soil microbial C and N. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 19: 77–87Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cataldo DA, Harron M, Schrader LF, Youngs VL (1975) Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 6: 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    You MP, Sivasithamparam K (1994) Hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate in an avocado plantation mulch suppressive to Phytophtora cinnamoni and its relationship with certain biotic and abiotic factors. Soil Sci Biochem 26: 1355–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1977) Phosphatases in soil. Soil Sci Biochem 9: 167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirchner MJ, Wollum, AG, King LD (1993) Soil microbial populations and activities in reduced chemical input agroecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57: 1289–1295Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fauci MF, Dick RP (1994) Microbial biomass as on indicator of soil quality: Effects of long-term management and recent soil amendments. In: Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication 35–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adalgisa Belligno
    • 1
  • Marco Russo
    • 1
  • Vito Sardo
    • 2
  • Ju Ying Wu
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche, Agrochimiche e delle Produzioni AnimaliUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Beijing Research Center for Grass and EnvironmentBanjing Haidian DistrictBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations