Advertisement

Quantum Spaces pp 203-227 | Cite as

Non-commutative Geometry and the Spectral Model of Space-time

  • Alain Connes
Part of the Progress in Mathematical Physics book series (PMP, volume 53)

Abstract

This is a report on our joint work with A. Chamseddine and M. Marcolli. This essay gives a short introduction to a potential application in physics of a new type of geometry based on spectral considerations which is convenient when dealing with non-commutative spaces, i.e., spaces in which the simplifying rule of commutativity is no longer applied to the coordinates. Starting from the phenomenological Lagrangian of gravity coupled with matter one infers, using the spectral action principle, that space-time admits a fine structure which is a subtle mixture of the usual 4-dimensional continuum with a finite discrete structure F. Under the (unrealistic) hypothesis that this structure remains valid (i.e., one does not have any “hyperfine” modification) until the unification scale, one obtains a number of predictions whose approximate validity is a basic test of the approach.

Keywords

Yukawa Coupling Dirac Operator Spectral Model Adjoint Action Spectral Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Barrett, A Lorentzian version of the non-commutative geometry of the standard. model of particle physics hep-th/0608221.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Bordé, Base units of the SI, fundamental constants and modern quantum physics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 363 (2005), 2177–2201.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Universal Formula for Non-commutative Geometry. Actions: Unification of Gravity and the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), 4868–4871.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, The Spectral Action Principle, Comm.Math. Phys. 186 (1997), 731–750.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Scale Invariance in the Spectral Action, hep-th/0512169 to appear in Jour. Math. Phys.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, Inner fluctuations of the spectral action, hep-th/0605011.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, M. Marcolli, Gravity and the standard model with neutrino. mixing, hep-th/0610241.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Coleman, Aspects of symmetry, Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Connes, Non-commutative geometry, Academic Press (1994).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Connes, Non-commutative geometry and reality, Journal of Math. Physics 36 no. 11 (1995).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Connes, Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of non-commutative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. (1995)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Connes, Non-commutative Geometry and the standard model with neutrino mixing, hep-th/0608226.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Connes, M. Marcolli Non-commutative Geometry, Quantum fields and Motives, Book in preparation.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Connes, H. Moscovici, The local index formula in non-commutative geometry, GAFA, Vol. 5 (1995), 174–243.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    L. Dąbrowski, A. Sitarz, Dirac operator on the standard Podleśs quantum sphere, Non-commutative Geometry and Quantum Groups, Banach Centre Publications 61, Hajac, P.M. and Pusz, W. (eds.), Warszawa: IMPAN, 2003, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. Giddings, D. Marolf, J. Hartle, Observables in effective gravity, hep-th/0512200.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Gracia-Bondia, B. Iochum, T. Schucker, The standard model in non-commutative. geometry and fermion doubling. Phys. Lett. B 416 no. 1–2 (1998), 123–128.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Kastler, Non-commutative geometry and fundamental physical interactions: The. Lagrangian level, Journal. Math. Phys. 41 (2000), 3867–3891.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Knecht, T. Schucker Spectral action and big desert hep-ph/065166Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    O. Lauscher, M. Reuter, Asymptotic Safety in Quantum Einstein Gravity: nonperturbative. renormalizability and fractal spacetime structure, hep-th/0511260.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Lizzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, G. Sparano, Fermion Hilbert space and Fermion. Doubling in the Non-commutative Geometry Approach to Gauge Theories hepth/9610035.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Mather, Commutators of diffeomorphisms. II, Comment. Math. Helv. 50 (1975), 33–40.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R.N. Mohapatra, P.B. Pal, Massive neutrinos in physics and astrophysics, World Scientific, 2004.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Rieffel, Morita equivalence for C*-algebras and W*-algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 5 (1974), 51–96.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Sher, Electroweak Higgs potential and vacuum stability, Phys. Rep. Vol.179 (1989) N.5–6, 273–418.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Veltman, Diagrammatica: the path to Feynman diagrams, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain Connes
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.IHÉSBures-sur-YvetteFrance
  2. 2.Collége de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations