Advertisement

A Generative System for Mamluk Madrasa Form-Making

Chapter
  • 514 Downloads
Part of the Nexus Network Journal book series (NNJ, volume 9,1)

Abstract

In this paper, a parametric shape grammar for the derivation of the floor plans of educational buildings (madrasas) in Mamluk architecture is presented. The grammar is constructed using a corpus of sixteen Mamluk madrasas that were built in Egypt, Syria, and Palestine during the Mamluk period. Based on an epistemological premise of structuralism, the morphology of Mamluk madrasas is analyzed to deduce commonalities of the formal and compositional aspects among them. The set of underlying common lexical and syntactic elements that are shared by the study cases is listed. The shape rule schemata to derive Mamluk madrasa floor plans are formulated. The sets of lexical elements and syntactic rules are systematized to form a linguistic framework. The theoretical framework for the formal language of Mamluk architecture is structured to establish a basis for a computerized model for the automatic derivation of Mamluk madrasa floor plans.

Keywords

Shape grammar generative system visual studies Mamluk architecture school design Islamic architecture design process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Jokhadar, A. 2004. Shape Grammars: An Analytical Study of Architectural Composition Using Algorithms and Computer Formalism, Unpublished Master Thesis, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.Google Scholar
  2. Bianca, S. 2000. Urban Form in the Arab World: Past and Present. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Burgoyne M.H. 1987. Mamluk Jerusalem: An Architectural Study. Published on behalf of the British school of archeology in Jerusalem by the Islam Festival Trust, London.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Ding L., Gero J.S. 2001. The emergence of the representation of style in design. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design28: 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eilouti, B. 2003. Three-dimensional modeling by replacement. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference: Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization (July), Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Eilouti, B. and A. Aljokhadar. 2007. A Computer-Aided Rule-Based Mamluk madrasa Plan Generator. Nexus Network Journal9,1: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gips J. 1975. Shape Grammars and their Uses. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  9. Glassie, H. 1975. A Structural Analysis of Historical Architecture. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  10. Himmo, B. 1995. Geometry Working out Mamluk Architectural Designs: Case Study: Sabil Qaytbay in Holy Jerusalem. Master Thesis, University of Jordan, Jordan.Google Scholar
  11. The Islamic Methodology for the Architectural and Urban Design. 1991. Proceedings of the 4th seminar, Rabat. Morocco Organization of Islamic Capitals and Cities.Google Scholar
  12. Knight T.W. 1999. Shape grammars: six types. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design 26: 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. March L. 1999. Architectonics of proportion: historical and mathematical grounds. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design26: 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michel, G., 1996. Architecture of the Islamic World: Its History and Social Meaning. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell W.J. 1986. Formal representations: a foundation of computer aided architectural design. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design13: 33–162.Google Scholar
  16. Osman M.S. 1998. Shape grammars: simplicity to complexity. Paper presented in University of East London. (http://www.ceca.uel.ac.uk/cad/studen_work/msc/ian/shape.html, accessed 1 Oct 2003).Google Scholar
  17. Organization of Islamic Capitals and Cities. 1990. Workshop of Architectural and Urban Design Fundamentals in Islamic Periods, Islamic Architecture Heritage Conservation Center, Cairo, Egypt 1990.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, R. 1985. Islamic Monuments in Cairo. 3rd ed. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
  19. Serageldin, R. 1988. Educational Workshop. In Places of Public Gathering in Islam. Proceedings of Seminar Five, Architectural Transformations in the Islamic World. Amman, Jordan: The Aga Khan Foundation for Architecture.Google Scholar
  20. Steadman J.P. 1983. Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  21. Stierlin, Henri 1984. Great Civilizations: The Cultural History of the Arabs. London: Aurum Press.Google Scholar
  22. -. 1996. Islam: Early Architecture from Baghdad to Cordoba. Taschen Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Stiny G. and Mitchell W. J. 1980. The grammar of paradise: on the generation of Mughul gardens. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design7: 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiny G. 1980. Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and Planning ‘B’: Planning and Design7: 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams, John Alden. 1984. Urbanization and Monument Construction in Mamluk Cairo. In Muqarnas II: An Annual on Islamic Art and Architecture. Oleg Garbar (ed). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan
  2. 2.College of Architecture & Design German-Jordanian UniversityAmmanJordan
  3. 3.TURATH: Heritage Conservation Management and Environmental Design ConsultantsAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations