Skip to main content

The Basics of the Model Construction Method

  • Chapter
Kripke’s Worlds

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

  • 1265 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is about the basic modal logic K and its multimodal version K n . We also present the basic description logic ALC, which can be viewed as a notational variant of K n . The implementation of reasoning methods for all these logics can be done by means of the most basic rules, that are combined by the most basic strategies: fair strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We recall that although LoTREC does not display parentheses around <> Q & <>(R v ~P) because & is declared to be associative, we nevertheless did so here—just by declaring & to be non-associative in the language tab—in order to make clear the order of decomposition of A. That order is determined by the way we wrote down A in LoTREC’s prefix notation, viz. as

    and nec P and pos Q or pos R not P

    as opposed to and and nec P pos Q or pos R not P.

  2. 2.

    We have already mentioned in Sect. 3.4 that the node name w should in principle also be declared to be a variable. However, there are no constant symbols denoting particular nodes in LoTREC. We therefore write w instead of variable w: by convention, the first argument of the ‘add’ action is always a variable.

  3. 3.

    ToDo A verifier que c’est bien different (y avait une erreur trouvee par Teddy).

References

  1. P. Blackburn, J.F.A.K. van Benthem, and F. Wolter. Handbook of Modal Logic, volume 3 of Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning. Elsevier Science, New York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Blackburn, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema. Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E.W. Beth. Semantic entailment and formal derivability. In Mededlingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde, N.R, volume 18(3), pages 309–342, 1955. Reprinted in Jaakko Intikka (ed.) The Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Baader and U. Sattler. Tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica, 69:2001, 2000.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Chagrov and M. Zakharyaschev. Modal Logic. Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, London, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fitting. Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D.M. Gabbay, A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev. Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications, volume 148 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Goré. Tableau methods for modal and temporal logics. In M. D’Agostino, D.M. Gabbay, R. Hähnle, and J. Posegga, editors, Handbook of Tableau Methods, pages 297–396. Hingham, MA, USA. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Horrocks. The fact system. In H. de Swart, editor, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX’98), volume 1397 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 307–312. Springer, Berlin, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Horrocks. Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pages 636–647, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Nipkow, L.C. Paulson, and M. Wenzel. Isabelle/HOL—A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic, volume 2283 of LNCS. Springer, Berlin, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L.C. Paulson. The foundation of a generic theorem prover, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 5, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Smullyan. First Order-Logic. Dover, New York, 1995. First print: 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Tsarkov and I. Horrocks. Fact++ description logic reasoner: system description. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006), volume 4130 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 292–297. Springer, Berlin, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gasquet, O., Herzig, A., Said, B., Schwarzentruber, F. (2014). The Basics of the Model Construction Method. In: Kripke’s Worlds. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8504-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics