Skip to main content

Can Sea Fog be Inferred from Operational GEM Forecast Fields?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fog and Boundary Layer Clouds: Fog Visibility and Forecasting

Abstract

Three cases of widespread sea fog in Lunenburg Bay, Nova Scotia were used to evaluate the suitability of operational regional GEM forecast fields for inferring advection fog occurrences. Verification scores suggest that the objective analyses contain significant departures from observations that will affect model accuracy, given the sensitivity of fog condensation microphysics. Dew point depression (ES) scores show larger differences compared to temperature, with both influenced by surface characteristics. For objective analyses and GEM forecasts ES >2C seems to match fog satellite images better than the physical threshold ES ≤0 C. In addition the GEM forecasts show a general tendency towards drier conditions near the surface, therefore reconfiguring GEM to better represent condensations in the boundary layer is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Muraca, G., MacIver, D.C., Urquizo, N., and Auld, H., The climatology of fog in Canada, Conf. Fog and Fog Collection (St. John’s Canada, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. and Buckley, R.L., Visibility trends for coastal regions, 14th Conf. Applied Climatology (Am. Meteor. Soc. 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiffen, B., Delannoy, P., and Siok, S., Fog: Impact on road transportation and mitigation options, 10th World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transportation Systems and Services (Madrid Spain, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, D. and Hansen, B. K. (2002), A fuzzy case-based system for weather prediction, Eng. Int. Syst. 3, 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, W.T. (1994), Back to basics: Fog — Definitions and basic physics, Weather 49, 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada, Where the wind blows (Breakwater Books Ltd., St. John’s Newfoundland 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, J.W. and Chai, S.K. (1993), Marine fog and its dissipation over warm water, J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 3336–3349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.M., Koracin, D., and Redmond K.T. (2004), Sea fog research in the United Kingdom and United States: A historical essay including outlook, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 85, 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, A.H. (1976), Techniques for the prediction of sea fog over the Scotian shelf, Technical Report TEC 825, Environment Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipper, D.F. (1994), Fog on the U.S. West Coast: A review, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 75, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiszler, D., Cook, J., Tag, P., Thompson, W., Bankert, R., and Schmidt, J. (2000), Evaluation of ceiling and visibility prediction: preliminary results over the California coast using COAMPS, Sci. Appl. Internat. Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, H., Desjardins, S., Sheng, J., and Wang, L., Coupled atmosphere-ocean observations and modeling for Lunenburg Bay, Nova Scotia, Sym. Forecasting the Weather and Climate of the Atmosphere and Ocean (American Meteorological Society 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailhot, J. (2006), Pers. corresp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stull, R.B., Meteorology for Scientists and Engineers (Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove California 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, COMET: Satellite Meteorology, http:// www.comet.ucar.edu/class/satemt/ellrod.html. 2006.

  • Côte, J., Gravel, S., Méthot, A., Patoine, A., Roch, M., and Staniforth, A. (1998), The Operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) Model. Part 1: Design considerations and formulation, Mon. Wea. Rev. 126, 1373–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, C. (2004), pers. corresp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garand, L. and Nadon, S. (1998), High-resolution satellite analysis and model evaluation of clouds and radiation over the Mackenzie Basin using AVHRR data, J. Climate 11, 1976–1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

De La Fuente, L., Delage, Y., Desjardins, S., MacAfee, A., Pearson, G., Ritchie, H. (2007). Can Sea Fog be Inferred from Operational GEM Forecast Fields?. In: Gultepe, I. (eds) Fog and Boundary Layer Clouds: Fog Visibility and Forecasting. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics