The necessity for an interactive theory of immunity


It was known for a long time that certain immune reactions, particularly some that manifested themselves as skin swellings, were elicited by cells rather than soluble antibodies. For example, classical experiments of Chase in 1945 had shown that immunity of guinea pigs to tubercle bacilli, as tested by a skin reaction to tuberculin, was transferable to non-immune animals by lymph node cells but not by serum of immune animals1. This type of immunity had been termed “cellular immunity”, not knowing what it really was, to distinguish it from antibody-mediated “humoral immunity”. In his first paper on the transfer of transplantation immunity by lymph node cells in 1953 Mitchison commented “transplantation immunity shares with ... immunity to tuberculin the property of being transferred with greater facility by cells than by serum”2. In the absence of a paradigm that included immune mechanisms without antibodies, these observations were not followed by any sort of interpretation.


Transplant Rejection Interactive Theory Foreign Antigen Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Associative Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 7 References

  1. 1.
    Chase M (1945) The cellular transfer of cutaneous hypersensitivity to tuberculin. Proc Soc Exp Biol 59: 134Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchison NA (1953) Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. Nature 171: 267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller JFA (2003) Biological curiosities, what can we learn from them? In: Eichmann K (ed): The biology of complex organisms. Creation and protection of integrity. Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller JFA (1961) Immunological function of the thymus. Lancet 2: 748–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Claman HN, Chaperon EA, Triplett RF (1966) Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol 97: 828–832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Claman HN, Chaperon EA, Triplett RF (1966) Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 122: 1167–1171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller JFA, Mitchell GF (1967) Thymus and precursors of antigen reactive cells. Nature 216: 659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller JFA, Mitchell GF (1968) Cell to cell interaction in immune response.1. Hemolysis-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med 128: 801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitchell GF, Miller JFA (1968) Cell to cell interaction in immune response. 2. Source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med 128: 821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raff MC (1969) Theta isoantigen as a marker of thymus-derived lymphocytes in mice. Nature 224: 378–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moller G (1961) Demonstration of mouse isoantigens at cellular level by fluorescent antibody technique. J Exp Med 114: 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raff MC (1970) Two distinct populations of peripheral lymphocytes in mice distinguishable by immunofluorescence. Immunology 19: 637–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raff MC, Sternberg M, Taylor RB (1970) Immunoglobulin determinants on the surface of mouse lymphoid cells. Nature 225: 553–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ford WL, Gowans J (1969) The traffic of lymphocytes. Semin Hematol 6: 67–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cantor H, Boyse EA (1975) Development and function of subclasses of T cells. J Reticuloendothel Soc 17: 115–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weissman IL, Masuda T, Olive C, Friedberg SH (1975) Differentiation of migration of T lymphocytes. Isr J Med Sci 11: 1267–1277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlesinger M (1970) Anti-theta antibodies for detecting thymus-dependent lymphocytes in the immune response of mice to SRBC. Nature 226: 1254–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Playfair JH, Purves EC (1971) Antibody formation by bone marrow cells in irradiated mice. I. Thymus-dependent and thymus-independent responses to sheep erythrocytes. Immunology 21: 113–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajewsky K, Schirrmacher V, Nase S, Jerne NK (1969) The requirement of more than one antigenic determinant for immunogenicity. J Exp Med 129: 1131–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchison NA (1971) The carrier effect in the secondary response to haptenprotein conjugates. II. Cellular cooperation. Eur J Immunol 1: 18–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ilya Ilyich Metchnikov: Intra-Cellular Digestion (1882), The Comparative Pathology of Inflammation (1892), and Immunity in Infectious Diseases (1905)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zarafonetis C, Harmon DR, Clark PF (1947) The influence of temperature upon opsonization and phagocytosis. J Bacteriol 53: 343–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mishell RI, Dutton RW (1967) Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med 126: 423–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Askonas BA, Auzins I, Unanue ER (1968) Role of macrophages in the immune response. Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris) 50: 1113–1128Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Unanue ER, Cerottini JC (1970) The function of macrophages in the immune response. Semin Hematol 7: 225–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bach FH, Voynow NK (1966) One-way stimulation in mixed leukocyte cultures. Science 153: 545–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilson DB (1967) Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. I. Conditions and parameters of response. J Exp Med 126: 625–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simonsen M (1965) Recent experiments on the graft-versus-host reaction in the chick embryo. Br Med Bull 21: 129–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nisbet NW, Simonsen M, Zaleski M (1969) The frequency of antigen-sensitive cells in tissue transplantation. A commentary on clonal selection. J Exp Med 129: 459–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein J (1966) Strength of some H-2 antigens in mice. Folia Biol (Praha) 12: 168–175Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bach FH (1968) Transplantation: problems of histocompatibility testing. Science 159: 1196–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bach FH, Amos DB (1967) Hu-1: Major histocompatibility locus in man. Science 156: 1506–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davies DA, Manstone AJ, Viza DC, Colombani J, Dausset J (1968) Human transplantation antigens: the HL-A (Hu-1) system and its homology with the mouse H-2 system. Transplantation 6: 571–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ceppelini R (1971) Old and new facts and speculations about transplantation antigens of man. Progr Immunol I, Amos B. Ed. Academic Press, p. 973Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hayry P, Defendi V (1970) Mixed lymphocyte cultures produce effector cells: model in vitro for allograft rejection. Science 168: 133–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hayry P, Andersson LC (1973) T cells in mixed-lymphocyte-culture-induced cytolysis (MLC-CML). Transplant Proc 5: 1697–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cerottini JC, Engers HD, Macdonald HR, Brunner T (1974) Generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. I. Response of normal and immune mouse spleen cells in mixed leukocyte cultures. J Exp Med 140: 703–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Andersson LC, Hayry P (1973) Specific priming of mouse thymus-dependent lymphocytes to allogeneic cells in vitro. Eur J Immunol 3: 595–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Andersson LC, Nordling S, Hayry P (1973) Allograft immunity in vitro. VI. Autonomy of T lymphocytes in target cell destruction. Scand J Immunol 2: 107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gardner I, Bowern NA, Blanden RV (1974) Cell-mediated cytotoxicity against ectromelia virus-infected target cells. I. Specificity and kinetics. Eur J Immunol 4: 63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McDevitt HO, Sela M (1965) Genetic control of the antibody response. I. Demonstration of determinant-specific differences in response to synthetic polypeptide antigens in two strains of inbred mice. J Exp Med 122: 517–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McDevitt HO, Sela M (1967) Genetic control of the antibody response II. Further analysis of the specificity of determinant-specific control, and genetic analysis of the response to (H,G)-A-L in CBA and C57 mice. J Exp Med 126: 969–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ellman L, Green I, Martin WJ, Benacerraf B (1970) Linkage between the poly-L-lysine gene and the locus controlling the major histocompatibility antigens in strain 2 guinea pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 66: 322–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zinkernagel RM, Doherty PC (1974) Restriction of in vitro T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in lymphocytic choriomeningitis within a syngeneic or semiallogeneic system. Nature 248: 701–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zinkernagel RM (1974) Restriction by H-2 gene complex of transfer of cellmediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 251: 230–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kindred B (1975) The failure of allogeneic cells to maintain an immune response in nude mice. Scand J Immunol 4: 653–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Katz DH, Graves M, Dorf ME, Dimuzio H, Benacerraf B (1975) Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. VII. Cooperative responses between lymphocytes are controlled by genes in the I region of the H-2 complex. J Exp Med 141: 263–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Claman HN, McDonald W (1964) Thymus and X-irradiation in the termination of aquired immunological tolerance in the adult mouse. Nature 202: 713 Claman HN, Talmage DW (1963) Thymectomy: Prolongation of the immunological tolerance in the adult mouse. Science 141: 1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Droege W (1971) Amplifying and suppressive effect of thymus cells. Nature 234: 549–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gershon RK, Kondo K (1971) Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology 21: 903–914 Gershon RK, Cohen P, Hencin R, Liebhaber SA. 1972. Suppressor T cells. J Immunol 108: 586–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gershon RK (1975) A disquisition on suppressor T cells. Transplant Rev 26: 170–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Green DR, Flood PM, Gershon RK (1983) Immunoregulatory T cell pathways. Ann Rev Immunol 1: 439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jerne NK, (1971) The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur J Immunol 1: 1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bretscher P, Cohn M (1970) A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science 169: 1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Langman RE, Cohn M (1993) Two signal models of lymphocyte activation? Immunol Today 14: 235–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further reading

  1. Good RA, Finstad J (1968) The development and involution of the lymphoid system and immunologic capacity. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 79: 69–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohn M (1970) Selection under a somatic model. Cell Immunol 1: 461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohn M (1972) Immunology: what are the rules of the game? Cell Immunol 5: 1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Van Rood JJ, Van Leeuwen A, Freudenberg J, Rubinstein P (1971) Prospects in host-donor matching. Transplant Proc 3: 1042–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Herzenberg LA, Chan EL, Ravitch MM, Riblet RJ, Herzenberg LA. (1973) Active suppression of immunoglobulin allotype synthesis. 3. Identification of T cells as responsible for suppression by cells from spleen, thymus, lymph node, and bone marrow. J Exp Med 137: 1311–1324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gershon RK, Mokyr MB, Mitchell MS (1974). Activation of suppressor T cells by tumour cells and specific antibody. Nature 250: 594–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirkwood JM, Gershon RK (1974) A role for suppressor T cells in immunological enhancement of tumor growth. Prog Exp Tumor Res 19: 157–164PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag AG 2008

Personalised recommendations