Skip to main content

The Tsunami of 26 December, 2004: Numerical Modeling and Energy Considerations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Tsunami and Its Hazards in the Indian and Pacific Oceans

Part of the book series: Pageoph Topical Volumes ((PTV))

Abstract

A numerical model for the global tsunamis computation constructed by Kowalik et al. (2005), is applied to the tsunami of 26 December, 2004 in the World Ocean from 80°S to 69°N with spatial resolution of one minute. Because the computational domain includes close to 200 million grid points, a parallel version of the code was developed and run on a Cray X1 supercomputer. An energy flux function is used to investigate energy transfer from the tsunami source to the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Although the first energy input into the Pacific Ocean was the primary (direct) wave, reflections from the Sri Lankan and eastern shores of Maldives were a larger source. The tsunami traveled from Indonesia, around New Zealand, and into the Pacific Ocean by various routes. The direct path through the deep ocean to North America carried miniscule energy, while the stronger signal traveled a considerably longer distance via South Pacific ridges as these bathymetric features amplified the energy flux vectors. Travel times for these amplified energy fluxes are much longer than the arrival of the first wave. These large fluxes are organized in the wave-like form when propagating between Australia and Antarctica. The sources for the larger fluxes are multiple reflections from the Seychelles, Maldives and a slower direct signal from the Bay of Bengal. The energy flux into the Atlantic Ocean shows a different pattern since the energy is pumped into this domain through the directional properties of the source function. The energy flow into the Pacific Ocean is approximately 75% of the total flow to the Atlantic Ocean. In many locations along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts, the first arriving signal, or forerunner, has lower amplitude than the main signal which often is much delayed. Understanding this temporal distribution is important for an application to tsunami warning and prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Flather, R. A. and Heaps, N. S. (1975), Tidal computations for Morecambe Bay, Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc. 42, 489–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gover, J. (2005), Jason 1 detects the 26 December 2004 tsunami, EOS, Trans. AGU 86, 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, R.F. and Foreman, M.G.G. (2001), A representation of tidal currents based on energy flux, Marine Geodesy, 2493, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata, K., Satake, K., Tanioka, Y., Kuragano, T., Hasegawa, Y., Hayashi, Y., and Hamada, N. (2005), The Indian Ocean Tsunami: Tsunami source model from satellite altimetry. Proc. Internat. Tsunami Symp. (eds., G.A. Papadopoulos and K. Satake) (Chania, Greece, 2005), pp. 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamura, F., Review of tsunami simulation with a finite difference method. In: Long-Wave Runup Models (eds. H. Yeah, P. Liu, and C. Synolakis) (World Scientific (1996)), pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, Z. (2003), Basic relations between tsunami calculation and their physics-II, Science of Tsunami Hazards 21(3), 154–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, Z. and Murty, T. S., Numerical Modeling of Ocean Dynamics (World Scientific (1993a)), 481 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, Z. and Murty, T. S. (1993b), Numerical simulation of two-dimensional tsunami runup, Marine Geodesy 16, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, Z., Knight, W., Logan, T., and Whitmore, P. (2005), Numerical Modeling of the Global Tsunami: Indonesian Tsunami of 26 December, 2004, Science of Tsunami Hazards 23(1), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, T., Kanamori, H., Ammon, C. J., Nettles, M., Ward, S. N., Aster, R. C., Beck, S. L., Bilek, S. L., Brudzinski, M. R., Butler, R., Deshon, H. R., Ekstrom, G., Satake, K., and Sipkin, S. (2005), The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December, 2004. Science 308, 1127–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader, C. L., Numerical Modeling of Water Waves (CRC Press (2004)), 274 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meguro, K. (2005), Report on the 2004 Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster, http://icus-incede.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/wwwe/publications/reports/report8.htm#top.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei, C. C., The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves, (World Scientific (1989)), 740 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, M. A., Firing, Y. L., Aarup, T., Agricole, W., Brundrit, G., Chang-Seng, D., Farre, R., Kilonsky, B., Knight, W., Kong, L., Magori, C., Manurung, P., Mccreery, C., Mitchell, W., Pillay, S., Schindele, F., Shillington, F., Testut, L., Wijeratne, E. M. S., Caldwell, P., Jardin, J., Nakahara, S., Porter, F.-Y., and Turetsky, N. (2005), Tide gauge observations of the Indian Ocean tsunami, December 26, 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 L09603, doi:10.1029/2005GL022610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, Y. (1985), Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 75, 1135–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovich, A. B. (2005), Web compilation of tsunami amplitudes and arrival times. http://wwwsci. pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/osap/projects/tsunami/tsunamiasia_e.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. O. and Bodine, R. O. (1968), Numerical model for storm surges in Galveston Bay, J. Waterway Harbor Div. 94(WWI), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. and E. Okal, E. (2005), Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake, Nature 434, 581–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, F. E., Munk, W. H., and Miller, G. R. (1962), California’s continental borderland. Part I. Background spectra, J. Mar. Research 20, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titov, V., Rabinovich, A. B., Mofjeld, H. O., Thomson, R. E., and González, F. I. (2005), The global reach of the 26 December, 2004 Sumatra tsunami, Science 309, 2045–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, P., Ioualalen, M., Grilli, S., Shi, F., and Kirby, J. T. (2005), Numerical simulation of the December 26, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami using high-order Boussinesq model, Fifth Int. Symp. Waves 2005, July, 2005, Madrid Spain, 10 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kowalik, Z., Knight, W., Logan, T., Whitmore, P. (2007). The Tsunami of 26 December, 2004: Numerical Modeling and Energy Considerations. In: Satake, K., Okal, E.A., Borrero, J.C. (eds) Tsunami and Its Hazards in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8364-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics