Skip to main content
  • 2168 Accesses

Abstract

The process of discovering and developing a new product can easily take 10–15 years and can cost a sponsor hundreds of millions of dollars. Yet only about 1 of 10000 potential products is deemed to be safe and effective and therefore eligible for approval [1]. In addition, with the widespread use of improved computer technology, the international public has become increasingly aware of the risks associated with using drugs and biologics. Sponsors and regulatory agencies both are being held accountable for approved marketing of products that are found to have life-threatening consequences once they are used by a large population. As a result of public pressure for improved safety and of industry pressure for regulatory agencies to streamline the approval process, many initiatives have arisen that have driven the need to develop the ability to share safety information in a consistent way on an international level [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. New Drug Development: Science, Business, Regulatory, and Intellectual Property Issues Cited as Hampering Drug Development Efforts. November 2006. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0749_OnlinePDF.pdf (Accessed 20 February 2008).

  2. Boe, P., Authoring the CTD: Leveraging Granularity, Reusability, and Simplicity. Image Solutions, Inc.; Whippany, NJ. Version 1.0; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Drug Administration. Milestones in US Food and Drug Law History. Available at http://www.fda.gov/oc/history/default.htm (accessed 20 February 2008).

  4. Zolman, T., An Introduction to eCTD: Electronic Common Technical Documents. Image Solutions, Inc.; Whippany, NJ. Version 1.0; October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). M4 — Organisation of the Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Revision 3; Xanuary 2004. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 21 February 2008).

  6. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). The Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Quality — M4Q. The Quality Overall Summary of Module 2 and Module 3 Quality. Revision 1, September 2002. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 21 February 2008).

  7. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). The Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Safety — M4S. The Nonclinical Overview and Nonclinical Summaries of Module 2 and Organisation of Module 4. Revision 2, December 2002. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 21 February 2008).

  8. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). The Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Efficacy — M4E. Clinical Overview and Clinical Summary of Module 2 and Module 5 Clinical Study Reports. Revision 1, September 2002. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 21 February 2008).

  9. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). M2 EWG. Electronic Common Technical Document Specification V 3.2. February 04, 2004. Available at http://estri.ich.org/eCTD/eCTD_Specification_v3_2_OnlinePDF.pdf (Accessed 19 February 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICH Home Page: Structure of ICH. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 20 February 2008).

  11. The ICH Website. Available at http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-l.html (Accessed 21 February 2008).

  12. FDA Centers for Drug and Biologics Evaluation and Research (CDER and CBER). Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format — Human Pharmaceutical Product Applications and Related Submissions Using the eCTD Specifications. April 2006. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/7087rev_OnlinePDF.pdf (accessed 21 February 2008).

  13. ISIWriter™ CTD Templates. Copyright Image Solutions, Inc. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. FDA Centers for Drug and Biologics Evaluation and Research (CDER and CBER). Guidance for Industry: Integrated Summaries of Effectiveness and Safety: Location Within the Common Technical Document. Draft, June 2007. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/7621dft_OnlinePDF.pdf (accessed 21 February 2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boe, P. (2009). Global submissions: The common technical document. In: Wood, L.F., Foote, M. (eds) Targeted Regulatory Writing Techniques: Clinical Documents for Drugs and Biologics. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8362-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics