Advertisement

Inhalation toxicology

  • Amanda Hayes
  • Shahnaz Bakand
Part of the Experientia Supplementum book series (EXS, volume 100)

Abstract

Inhalation of gases, vapors and can cause a wide range of adverse health effects, ranging from simple irritation to systemic diseases. The large number of chemicals and complex mixtures present in indoor and outdoor air coupled with the introduction of new materials such as nanoparticles and nanofibers, is an area of growing concern for human health. Animal-based assays have been used to study the toxic effects of chemicals for many years. However, even so, very little is known about the potential toxicity of the vast majority of inhaled chemicals. As well as new or refined OECD test guidelines, continuing scientific developments are needed to improve the process of safety evaluation for the vast number of chemicals and inhaled materials. Although studying the toxic effects of inhaled chemicals is more challenging, promising in vitro exposure techniques have been recently developed that offer new possibilities to test biological activities of inhaled chemicals under biphasic conditions at the air liquid interface. This chapter gives an overview of inhalation toxicology as well as focusing on the potential application of in vitro methods for toxicity testing of airborne pollutants.

Keywords

Human Bronchial Epithelial Cell Inhalation Toxicity Cigarette Smoke Condensate Exposure Technique Food Chem Toxicol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dockery DW, Pope CA 3rd, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferries BG Jr, Speizer FE (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenberg MI, Phillips SD (2003) A brief history of occupational, industrial and environmental toxicology. In: MI Greenberg, RJ Hamilton, SD Phillips, GJ McCluskey (eds): Occupational, Industrial and Environmental Toxicology, 2nd edn., Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, 2–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winder C, Stacey NH (2004) Working examples on occupational toxicology. In: C Winder, NH Stacey (eds): Occupational Toxicology, 2nd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 549–577Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    NTP (1984) Toxicology Testing Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities. National Toxicology Program, National Research Council, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agrawal MR, Winder C (1996) The frequency and occurrence of LD50 values for materials in the workplace. J Appl Toxicol 16:407–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EPA (1998) Chemical Hazard Availability Study. The Environ mental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faustman E, Omenn G (2001) Risk Assessment. In: CD Klassen (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 83–104Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costa DL (2008) Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: Challenges and opportunities. Exp Toxicol Pathol 60: 105–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blaauboer BJ (2002) The applicability of in vitro-derived data in hazard identification and characterisation of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Pharm 11: 213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raabe OG (1999) Respiratory exposure to air pollutants. In: DL Swift, WM Foster (eds): Air Pollutants and the Respiratory Tract, Marcel Dekker, New York, 39–73Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghorbanli M, Bakand Z, Bakhshi Khaniki G, Bakand S (2007) Air pollution effects on the activity of antioxidant enzymes in Nerium oleander and Robinia pseudo acacia plants in Tehran. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng 4: 157–162Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lioy PJ, Zhang J (1999) Air pollution. In: DL Swift, WM Foster (eds): Air Pollutants and the Respiratory Tract, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1–38Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa DL (2001) Air pollution. In: CD Klaassen (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 979–1012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayes A, Bakand S, Winder C (2007) Novel in vitro exposure techniques for toxicity testing and biomonitoring of airborne contaminants. In: U Marx, V Sandig (eds): Drug Testing: In Vitro-Breakthroughs and Trends in Cell Culture Technology, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 103–124Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beckett WS (1999) Detecting respiratory tract responses to air pollutants. In: DL Swift, WM Foster (eds): Air Pollutants and the Respiratory Tract, Marcel, New York, 105–118Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boulet LP, Bowie D (1999) Acute occupational respiratory diseases. In: CE Mapp (ed.): Occupational Lung Disorders, European Respiratory Society, Huddersfield, UK, 320–346Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hext PM (2000) Inhalation toxicology. In: B Ballantyne, TC Marrs, T Syversen (eds): General and Applied Toxicology, Vol. 1, 2nd edn., Macmillan, London, 587–601Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Witschi H, Last JA (2001) Toxic responses of the respiratory system. In: CD Klaassen (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 515–534Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brouder J, Tardif R (1998) Absorption. In: P Wexler (ed.): Encyclopedia of Toxicology, Vol. 1, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1–7Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winder C (2004) Occupational respiratory diseases. In: C Winder, NH Stacey (eds): Occupational Toxicology, 2nd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 71–114Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lambre CR, Aufderheide M, Bolton RE, Fubini B, Haagsman HP, Hext PM, Jorissen M, Landry Y, Morin JP, Nemery B, Nettesheim P, Pauluhn J, Richards RJ, Vickers AEM, Wu R (1996) In vitro tests for respiratory toxicity, the report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 18. Altern Lab Anim 24: 671–681Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valentine R, Kennedy GL (2001) Inhalation toxicology. In: A Wallace Hayes (ed.): Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 4th edn., Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 1085–1143Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Witschi HP, Brain JD (1985) Toxicology of Inhaled Materials: General Principles of Inhalation Toxicology Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 75, Springer, Secaucus, NJGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rozman KK, Klaassen CD (2001) Absorption, distribution and excretion of toxicants. In: Klaassen CD (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 105–132Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IARC (2004) IARC Classifies Formaldehyde as Carcinogenic to Humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Press Release, N 153Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asgharian B, Wood R, Schlesinger RB (1995) Empirical modelling of particle deposition in the alveolar region of the lungs: A basis for interspecies extrapolation. Fundam Appl Toxicol 27: 232–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siegmann K, Scherrer L, Siegmann HC (1999) Physical and chemical properties of airborne nanoscale particles and how to measure their impact on human health. J Mol Struct 458: 191–201Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lundborg M, Johard U, Lastbom L, Gerde P, Camner P (2001) Human alveolar macrophage phagocytic function is impaired by aggregates of ultrafine carbon particles. Environ Res 86: 244–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bergeron S, Archambault D (2005) Canadian Stewardship Practices for Environmental Nanotechnology. Science-Metrix, Canada (http://www.science-metrix.com/eng/reports_2005_t.htm)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mühlfeld C, Gehr P, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2008) Translocation and cellular entering mechanisms of nanoparticles in the respiratory tract. Swiss Med Wkly 138: 387–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113: 823–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schlesinger RB (2000) Disposition of inhaled particles and gases. In: M Cohen, J Zelikoff, RB Schlesinger (eds): Pulmonary Immunotoxicology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 85–106Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eaton DL (2005) Toxicology. In: L Rosenstock, MR Cullen, CA Brodkin, CA Redlich (eds): Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2nd edn., Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 83–118Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vincent JH (1995) Aerosol Science for Industrial Hygienists. Elsevier Science, Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johnson D, Swift D (1997) Sampling and sizing particles. In: SR Dinardi (ed.): The Occupational Environment — Its Evaluation and Control, American Industrial Hygienists Association, AIHA Press, Fairfax, VA, 245–261Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    William PL, Burson JL (1985) Industrial Toxicology — Safety and Health Applications in the Workplace. Van Nostard Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Borm PJ, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdörster E (2006) The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Partic Fibre Toxicol 3: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    David A, Wagner GR (1998) Respiratory system. In: JM Stellman (ed.): Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th edn., Geneva, International Labour Office, 10.1–10.7Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Winder C (2004) Toxicology of gases, vapours and particulates. In: C Winder, NH Stacey (eds): Occupational Toxicology, 2nd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 399–424Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shusterman D (2002) Asphyxiation. In: DJ Hendrick, PS Burge, WS Beckett, A Chung (eds): Occupational Disorders of the Lung: Recognition, Management and Prevention, WB Saunders, London, 279–303Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hendrick DJ, Burge PS (2002) Asthma. In: DJ Hendrick, PS Burge, WS Beckett, A Churg (eds): Occupational Disorders of the Lung: Recognition, Management and Prevention, WB Saunders, London, 33–76Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lizarralde SM, Wake B, Thompson V, Weisman RS (2003) Jewelers. In: MI Greenberg, RJ Hamilton, SD Phillips, GJ McCluskey (eds): Occupational, Industrial, and Environmental Toxicology, 2nd edn., Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, 198–215Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tarlo SM, Chan-Yeung M (2005) Occupational asthma. In: L Rosenstock, MR Cullen, CA Brodkin, CA Redlich (eds): Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2nd edn., Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 293–308Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Koenig JQ, Luchtel DL (1997) Respiratory responses to inhaled toxicants. In: EJ Massaro (ed.): Handbook of Human Toxicology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 551–606Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mapp C (1999) Occupational Lung Disorders. European Respiratory Society Journals, Huddersfield, UKGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    NTP (2002) The National Toxicology Program Annual Plan Fiscal Year 2001 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. NIH Publication No. 02-5092Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stenton C (2002) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In: DJ Hendrick, PS Burge, WS Beckett, A Churg (eds): Occupational Disorders of the Lung: Recognition, Management and Prevention, WB Saunders, London, 77–91Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mapel W Coultas D (2002) Disorders due to minerals other than silica, coal, and asbestos, and to metals. In: DJ Hendrick, PS Burge, WS Beckett, A Churg (eds): Occupational Disorders of the Lung: Recognition, Management and Prevention, WB Saunders, London, 163–190Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Meredith S, Blank PD (2002) Surveillance: Clinical and epidemiological perspectives. In: DJ Hendrick, PS Burge, WS Beckett, A Churg (eds): Occupational Disorders of the Lung: Recognition, Management and Prevention, WB Saunders, London, 7–24Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    McClellan RO (1999) Health risk assessments and regulatory considerations for air pollutants. In: DL Swift, WM Foster (eds): Air Pollutants and the Respiratory Tract. Marcel Dekker, New York, 289–338Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thorne PS (2001) Occupational toxicology. In: CD Klaassen (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1123–1140Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Arts JH, Muijser H, Jonker D, van de Sandt JJ, Bos PM, Feron VJ (2008) Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments. Exp Toxicol Pathol 60: 125–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barile FA (1994) Introduction to In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Mechanisms and Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Miller GC, Klonne DR (1997) Occupational exposure limits. In: SR DiNardi (ed.): The Occupational Environment — Its Evaluation and Control, American Industrial Hygienists Association, AIHA Press, Fairfax, VA, 21–42Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    OECD (2004) Chemicals Testing: OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Section 4: Health Effects. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/ document/55/0,2340,en_2649_34377_2349687_1_1_1_1,00.html (accessed February 2009)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ekwall B (1983) Screening of toxic compounds in mammalian cell cultures. Ann NY Acad Sci 407: 64–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Balls M, Clothier RH (1992) Cytotoxicity assays for intrinsic toxicity and irritancy. In: RR Watson (ed.): In Vitro Methods of Toxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 37–52Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anderson D, Russell T (1995) The Status of Alternative Methods in Toxicology. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Barile FA (1997) Continuous cell lines as a model for drug toxicology assessment. In: JV Castell, MJ Gomez-Lechon (eds): In Vitro Methods in Pharmaceutical Research, Academic Press, San Diego, 33–54Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zucco F, de Angelis I, Stammati A (1998) Cellular models for in vitro toxicity testing. In: M Clynes (ed.): Animal Cell Culture Techniques, Springer Lab Manual, Springer, Berlin, 395–422Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Doyle A, Griffiths JB (2000) Cell and Tissue Culture for Medical Research. John Wiley & Sons, UKGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wilson AP (2000) Cytotoxicity and viability assays. In: JRW Masters (ed.): Animal Cell Culture, 3rd edn., Oxford University Press, New York, 175–219Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zucco F, de Angelis I, Testai E, Stammati A (2004) Toxicology investigations with cell culture systems: 20 years after. Toxicol In Vitro 18: 153–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Eisenbrand G, Pool-Zobel B, Baker V, Balls M, Blaauboer BJ, Boobis A, Carere A, Kevekordes S, Lhuguenot JC, Pieters R, Kleiner J (2002) Methods of in vitro toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol 40: 193–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gad SC (2000) In Vitro Toxicology, Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Faustman EM, Omenn GS (2001) Risk assessment. In: CD Klaassen (ed.): Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 83–104Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Aufderheide M (2005) Direct exposure methods for testing native atmospheres. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57: 213–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bakand S, Winder C, Khalil C, Hayes A (2005) Toxicity assessment of industrial chemicals and airborne contaminants: Transition from in vivo to in vitro test methods: A review. Inhal Toxicol 17:775–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nadeau D, Vincent R, Kumarathasan P, Brook J, Dufresne A (1995) Cytotoxicity of ambient air particles to rat lung macrophages: Comparison of cellular and functional assays. Toxicol In Vitro 10: 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Governa M, Valentino M, Amati M, Visona I, Botta GC, Marcer G, Gemignani C (1997) Biological effects of contaminated silicon carbide particles from a work station in a plant producing abrasives. Toxicol In Vitro 11: 201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Goegan P, Vincent R, Kumarathasan P, Brook JR (1998) Sequential in vitro effects of airborne particles in lung macrophages and reporter Cat-gene cell lines. Toxicol In Vitro 12: 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Baeza-Squiban A, Bonvallot V, Boland S, Marano F (1999) Diesel exhaust particles increase NF-κB DNA binding activity and c-Fos proto-oncogene expression in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro 13: 817–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Becker S, Soukup JM, Gallagher JE (2002) Differential particulate air pollution induced oxidant stress in human granulocytes, monocytes and alveolar macrophages. Toxicol In Vitro 16: 209–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Takano Y, Taguchi T, Suzuki I, Balis JU, Kazunari Y (2002) Cytotoxicity of heavy metals on primary cultured alveolar type II cells. Environ Res 89: 138–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Riley MR, Boesewetter DE, Kim AM, Sirvent FP (2003) Effects of metals Cu, Fe, Ni, V, and Zn on rat lung epithelial cells. Toxicology 190: 171–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Okeson CD, Riley MR, Riley-Saxton E (2004) In vitro alveolar cytotoxicity of soluble components of airborne particulate matter: Effects of serum on toxicity of transition metals. Toxicol In Vitro 18: 673–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Diabaté S, Mülhopt S, Paur HR, Krug HF (2002) Pro-inflammatory effects in lung cells after exposure to fly ash aerosol via the atmosphere or the liquid phase. Ann Occup Hyg 46 Suppl 1: 382–385Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hamers T, van Schaardenburg MD, Felzel EC, Murk AJ, Koeman JH (2000) The application of reporter gene assay for the determination of the toxic potency of diffuse air pollution. Sci Total Environ 262: 159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Yamaguchi T, Yamazaki H (2001) Cytotoxicity of airborne particulates sampled roadside in rodent and human lung fibroblasts. J Health Sci 47: 272–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Alfaro-Moreno E, Martinez L, Garcia-Cuellar C, Bonner JC, Murray JC, Rosas I, Rosales SP, Osornio-Vargas AR (2002) Biologic effects induced in vitro by PM10 from three different zones of Mexico City. Environ Health Perspect 110: 715–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Glowala M, Mazurek A, Piddubnyak V, Fiszer-Kierzkowska A, Michalska J, Krawczyk Z (2002) HSP70 overexpression increases resistance of V79 cells to cytotoxicity of airborne pollutants, but does not protect the mitotic spindle against damage caused by airborne toxins. Toxicology 170: 211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Baulig A, Sourdeval M, Meyer M, Marano F, Baeza-Squiban A (2003) Biological effects of atmospheric particles on human bronchial epithelial cells. Comparison with diesel exhaust particles. Toxicol In Vitro 17: 567–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bombick DW, Putnam KP, Doolittle DJ (1998) Comparative cytotoxicity studies of smoke condensates from different types of cigarettes and tobaccos. Toxicol In Vitro 12: 241–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Bombick BR, Murli H, Avalos JT, Bombick DW, Morgan WT, Putnam KP, Doolittle DJ (1998) Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicology of mainstream smoke condensate. Food Chem Toxicol 36: 183–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    McKarns SC, Bombic DW, Morton MJ, Doolittle DJ (2000) Gap junction intercellular communication and cytotoxicity in normal human cells after exposure to smoke condensates from cigarettes that burn or primarily heat tobacco. Toxicol In Vitro 14: 41–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Putnam KP, Bombic DW, Doolittle DJ (2002) Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 16: 599–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bakand S, Hayes AJ, Winder C, Khalil C, Markovic B (2005) In vitro cytotoxicity testing of airborne formaldehyde collected in serum-free culture media. Toxicol Indust Health 21: 147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ritter D, Knebel J, Aufderheide M (2001) In vitro exposure of isolated cells to native gaseous compounds — Development and validation of an optimized system for human lung cells. Exp Toxicol Pathol 53: 373–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Cardile V, Jiang X, Russo A, Casella F, Renis M, Bindoni M (1995) Effects of ozone on some biological activities of cells in vitro. Cell Biol Toxicol 11: 11–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Blanquart C, Giuliani I, Houcine O, Guennou C, Marano F, Jeulin C (1995) In vitro exposure of rabbit trachelium to SO2: Effects on morphology and ciliarity beating. Toxicol In Vitro 9: 123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Rusznak C, Devalia JL, Sapsford RJ, Davies RJ (1996) Ozone-induced mediator release from human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro and the influence of nedocromil sodium. Eur Respir J 9: 2298–2305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Mückter H, Zwing M, Bäder S, Marx T, Doklea E, Liebl B, Fichtl B, Georgieff M (1998) A novel apparatus for the exposure of cultured cells to volatile agents. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 40: 63–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Shiraishi F, Hashimoto S, Bandow H (1986) Induction of sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster V79 cells by exposure to the photochemical reaction products of toluene plus NO2 in the gas phase. Mutat Res 173: 135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    DelRaso NJ (1992) In vitro methods for assessing chemical or drug toxicity and metabolism in primary hepatocytes. In: RR Watson (ed.): In Vitro Methods of Toxicology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 176–201Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Morin JP, Fouquet F, Monteil C, Le Prieur E, Vaz E, Dionnet F (1999) Development of a new in vitro system for continuous in vitro exposure of lung tissue to complex atmospheres: Application to diesel exhaust toxicology. Cell Biol Toxicol 15: 143–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bombick DW, Ayres PH, Putnam K, Bombick BR, Doolittle DJ (1998) Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 3. In vitro toxicity of whole smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 36: 191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Chen LC, Fang CP, Qu QS, Fine JM, Schlesinger RB (1993) A novel system for the in vitro exposure of pulmonary cells to acid sulfate aerosols. Fund Appl Toxicol 20: 170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Knebel J, Ritter D, Aufderheide M (2002) Exposure of human lung cells to native diesel motor exhaust-development of an optimized in vitro test strategy. Toxicol In Vitro 16: 185–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Aufderheide M, Knebel J, Ritter D (2003) Novel approaches for studying pulmonary toxicity in vitro. Toxicol Lett 140–141: 205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Bakand S, Hayes A, Winder C (2007) Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of selected gaseous compounds in human alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro 21: 1341–1347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Bakand S, Hayes A, Winder C (2007) An integrated in vitro approach for toxicity testing of airborne contaminants. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70: 1604–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Potera C (2007) A new approach for testing airborne pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 115: A149–151Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Stark DM, Shopsis C, Borenfreund E, Babich H (1986) Progress and problems in evaluating and validating alternative assays in toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol 24: 449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Frazier JM, Bradlaw JA (1989) Technical problems associated with in vitro toxicity testing systems. A Report of the CAAT Technical Workshop of May 17–18, 1989. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Dierickx PJ (2003) Evidence for delayed cytotoxicity effects following exposure of rat hepatoma-derived Fa32 cells: Implications for predicting human acute toxicity. Toxicol In Vitro 17: 797–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Bakand S, Winder C, Khalil C, Hayes A (2006) A novel in vitro exposure technique for toxicity testing of selected volatile organic compounds. J Environ Monit 8: 100–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lang DS, Jörres RA, Mücke M, Siegfried W, Magnussen H (1998) Interactions between human bronchoepithelial cells and lung fibroblasts after ozone exposure in vitro. Toxicol Lett 96–97: 13–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Aufderheide M, Mohr U (2000) CULTEX — An alternative technique for cultivation and exposure of cells of the respiratory tract to the airborne pollutants at the air/liquid interface. Exp Toxicol Pathol 52: 265–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Bakand S, Winder C, Khalil C, Hayes A (2006) An experimental in vitro model for dynamic direct exposure of human cells to airborne contaminants. Toxicol Lett 165: 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Knebel J, Ritter D, Aufderheide M (1998) Development of an in vitro system for studying effects of native and photochemically transformed gaseous compounds using an air/liquid culture technique. Toxicol Lett 96–97: 1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Lestari F, Markovic B, Green AR, Chattopadhyay G, Hayes AJ (2006) Comparative assessment of three in vitro exposure methods for combustion toxicity. J Appl Toxicol 26: 99–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Lestari F, Green AR, Chattopadhyay G, Hayes AJ (2006) An alternative method for fire smoke toxicity assessment using human lung cells. Fire Safe J 41: 605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Warheit DB (2004) Nanoparticles health impacts. Mater Today 7: 32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Donaldson K, Tran L, Jimenez LA, Duffin R, Newby DE, Mills N, MacNee W, Stone V (2005) Combustion-derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Partic Fibre Toxicol 2: 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Suh WH, Suslick KS, Stucky GD, Suh YH (2009) Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience. Prog Neurobiol 87: 133–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Lindberg HK, Falck GC, Suhonen S, Vippola M, Vanhala E, Catalán J, Savolainen K, Norppa H (2009) Genotoxicity of nanomaterials: DNA damage and micronuclei induced by carbon nanotubes and graphite nanofibres in human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Toxicol Lett 186: 166–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Karn B, Masciangioli T, Zhang W, Colvin V, Alivisatos P (2005) Nanotechnology and the Environment; Applications and Implications. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Liu W (2006) Nanoparticles and their biological and environmental applications. J Biosci Bioeng 102: 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311: 622–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Renn O, Roco MC (2006) White Paper on Nanotechnology Risk Governance. International Risk Governance Council, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Dechsakulthorn F, Hayes A, Bakand S, Joeng L, Winder C (2008) In vitro cytotoxicity of selected nanoparticles using human skin fibroblasts. Altern Animal Test Exper — AATEX 14: 397–400Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Brown DM, Kinloch IA, Bangert U, Windle AH, Walter DM, Walker GS, Scotchford CA, Donaldson K, Stone V (2007) An in vitro study of the potential of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers to induce inflammatory mediators and frustrated phagocytosis. Carbon 45: 1743–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Donaldson K, Stone V, Tran CL, Kreyling W, Borm PJ (2004) Nanotoxicology. Occup Environ Med 61: 727–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Seaton A (2006) Nanotechnology and the occupational physician. Occup Med 56: 312–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Tolstoshev A (2006) Nanotechnology, Assessing the Environmental Risks for Australia. Earth Policy Centre, University of Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Gojova A, Guo B, Kota R, Rutledge JC, Kennedy IM, Barakat AI (2007) Induction of inflammation in vascular endothelial cells by metal oxide nanoparticles: Effects of particle composition. Environ Health Perspect 115: 403–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Cohen BS, McCammon CS Jr (2001) Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants. 9th edn., ACGIH, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Englert CB (2007) Nanomaterials and the environment: Uses, methods and measurement. J Environ Monit 9: 1154–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Drobne D (2007) Nanotoxicology for safe and sustainable nanotechnology. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 58: 471–478PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda Hayes
    • 1
  • Shahnaz Bakand
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Chemical Safety and Applied Toxicology (CSAT) Laboratories, School of Risk and Safety SciencesThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Occupational Health, School of Public HealthIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.School of Risk and Safety SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations