Impacts of seawater desalination plants on the marine environment of the Gulf

  • Sabine Lattemann
  • Thomas Höpner


Many coastal areas in the Gulf experience a rapid industrial and urban growth. This development is sustained by an increasing number of seawater desalination plants in the region which satisfy the growing demand for fresh water. The combined seawater desalination capacity in the Gulf countries exceeds 11 million cubic metres per day and accounts for 45% of the total world capacity. The predominating process is multi-stage flash distillation (MSF), whereas only a minor amount of the drinking water is produced by reverse osmosis (RO) plants and other processes (together < 15%). Due to their waste water discharges to the sea, desalination plants - and especially MSF plants - must be considered a main source of pollution in the Gulf. It is estimated that the combined discharge of all MSF plants in the Gulf amounts to a waste water flow of about 1,000 m3 per second - which is the equivalent of a major river. This waste water is characterised by increased salinity and elevated temperature. It additionally contains substantial amounts of chemical pollutants, such as chlorine (which is used for biofouling control in the plants), antiscalants (which are used for scale inhibition) and heavy metals (which are present due to corrosion). This paper gives an overview on the waste water characteristics of the two main desalination processes (MSF, RO), presents estimates of total chemical discharges to the Gulf for two selected pollutants (chlorine, copper) and discusses the potential impacts of seawater desalination activity on the Gulf’s marine environment.


Reverse Osmosis Environmental Impact Assessment Desalination Plant Thermal Plant Chlorine Dose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdel-Jawad, M. and Al-Tabtabaei, M. 1999. Impact of current power generation and water desalination activities on Kuwaiti marine environment. Proceedings of IDA World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse, San Diego, September 1999, 3: 231–240.Google Scholar
  2. Abdel-Moati, M. and Kureishy, T. 1997. Dissolved copper, cadmium and lead in the coastal waters of Qatar, Arabian Gulf. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 26: 143–149.Google Scholar
  3. Ali, M. and Riley, J. 1986. The distribution of halomethanes in the coastal waters of Kuwait. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 17: 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bou-Hamad, S., Abdel-Jawad, M., Ebrahim, S., Al-Mansour, M. and Al-Hijji, A. 1997. Performance evaluation of three different pretreatment systems for seawater reverse osmosis technique. Desalination, 110: 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buros O. 1999. The ABCs of desalting, 2nd edition. FMC Corporation, published by the International Desalination Association (IDA), Topsfield, Massachusetts, USA and sponsored by the Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC).Google Scholar
  6. Coles, S. and McCain, J. 1990. Environmental factors affecting benthic infaunal communities of the western Arabian Gulf. Marine Environmental Research, 29: 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EPA 1998. National recommended water quality criteria. U.S. EPA, National Center for Environmental Publications and Information, 11029 Kenwood Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, USA, Scholar
  8. Höpner, T. and Lattemann, S. 2002. Chemical impacts from seawater desalination plants-a case study of the northern Red Sea. Desalination, 152: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Höpner, T. and Windelberg, J. 1996. Elements of environmental impact studies on coastal desalination plants. Desalination, 108: 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IDA 2006. IDA Worldwide Desalting Plant Inventory, No. 19 in MS Excel format, Media Analytics Ltd., Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Kennish, M. 1997. Practical handbook of estuarine and marine pollution, 2nd edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 524 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Khordagui, H. 1992. Conceptual approach to selection of a control measure for residual chlorine discharge in Kuwait Bay. Environmental Management 16,3: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khordagui, H. 2002. Environmental impacts of power-desalination on the gulf marine ecosystem. In: Khan et al. (eds), The Gulf Ecosystem: Health and Sustainability, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 173–191.Google Scholar
  14. Lattemann, S. and Höpner, T. 2003. Seawater Desalination-Impacts of Brine and Chemical Discharges on the Marine Environment, Desalination Publications, L’Aquila, Italy, 142 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Mannaa, A. 1994. Environmental impacts of dual purpose plants. Desalination and Water Reuse, 41: 46–49.Google Scholar
  16. Mickley, M. 1995. Environmental Considerations for the Disposal of Desalination Concentrates, Desalination and Water Reuse, 54: 56–61.Google Scholar
  17. Morton, A., Callister, I. and Wade, N. 1996. Environmental impacts of seawater distillation and reverse osmosis processes. Desalination, 108: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oldfield, J. and Todd, B. 1996. Environmental aspects of corrosion in MSF and RO desalination plants. Desalination, 108: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saeed, T., Khordagui, H. and Al-Hashash, H. 1999. Contribution of power/desalination plants to the levels of halogenated volatile liquid hydrocarbons in the coastal areas of Kuwait. Desalination, 121: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott, D. 1995. A directory of wetlands in the Middle East. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and IWRB, Slimbridge, U.K., 560 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Shams El Din, A. and Mohammed, R. 1998. Kinetics of reaction between hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorite. Desalination, 115: 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shams El Din, A., Arain, R. and Hammoud, A. 2000. On the chlorination of seawater. Desalination, 129: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shriadah, M.M.A. 1999. Heavy metals in mangrove sediments of the United Arab Emirates shoreline (Arabian Gulf). Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 116: 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNEP 1999. Overview on land-based sources and activities affecting the marine environment in the ROPME sea area, UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 168. UNEP/GPA Coordination Office, P.O. Box 16227 2500 BE The Hague, The Netherlands and Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME), Box 26388, Safat 13124, Kuwait, 127 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Lattemann
    • 1
  • Thomas Höpner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM)Carl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations