Skip to main content

Implicit and explicit memory effects in haptic perception

  • Chapter
Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications

Abstract

There is considerable evidence in the literature showing that memory is not a unitary entity. Old neuropsychological findings from different groups of patients and more recent laboratory studies are in agreement about the major memory systems in the human brain. A distinction is made between declarative or explicit memory and nondeclarative or implicit memory. Of special interest is the distinction in declarative memory between episodic and semantic memory [1]. Episodic memory includes personal experiences and conscious recollection of events in our past. This type of memory is defined by the capacity to retrieve voluntarily facts and events in the spatial-temporal context. On the other hand, semantic memory refers to our general knowledge, including the meaning of words and concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further readings

  • Ballesteros S, Reales JM (2004) Intact haptic priming in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for dissociable memory systems. Neuropsychologia 44: 1063–1070 This article showed intact implicit memory for objects explored haptically without vision in normal older adults and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. In contrast, the explicit recognition of AD patients was highly impaired compared to healthy older adults.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar S (1999) Memory in touch. Psicothema 11: 747–767. In this article, Millar reviewed a series of studies dealing with short-term memory for stimuli presented to touch. She noticed that haptic spans are shorter than visual spans and explained this result in terms of the paucity of reference information to organise inputs spatially. Movements are also important as they can be used in haptic rehearsal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Three chapters of the book edited by Morton Heller and Soledad Ballesteros (2006) Touch and blindness: psychology and neuroscience published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates provide complementary information from three different laboratories on the neural substrate that supports visual and haptic object representations (Chapters 7, 8, and 9):-James, James, Humphrey, Goodale: Do visual and tactile object representations share the same neural substrate? 139–155-Sathian, Prather: Cerebral cortical processing of tactile form: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. 157–170-Pascual-leone, Theoret, Merabet, Kauffmann, Schlaug: The role of visual cortex in tactile processing: A metamodal brain. 171–195

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Birkhäuser Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ballesteros, S. (2008). Implicit and explicit memory effects in haptic perception. In: Grunwald, M. (eds) Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7612-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics