A flexible presentation model for distributed information systems

  • Thomas Kirste
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


One of the visions of mobile computing is to put “all information at the user’s fingertips” — to allow him to operate on any data, any time, anywhere. The idea is to create an information environment providing the homogeneous access to all data and services available in the distributed, mobile computing infrastructure. A fundamental requirement for the access to such an open, distributed information system is an intelligent selection of methods for information visualization based on user requirements and available display functionality.

In this paper, a flexible concept is proposed that allows to enrich the nodes of an information structure with information about which alternative display methods can be used for what parts of the node. These facets are then used by a recursive view generation process for selecting suitable display methods while creating a visualization of an information structure. Influence parameters such as user characteristics, display resources, and data properties can be used to guide the selection process in order to create a presentation that optimally meets the user’s goals.


Frame Structure Visualization Method Frame Model Data Entity Path Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arndt, S., Lukoschek, K., Schumann, H. Design of a visualization support tool for the representation of multi-dimensional data sets. In Proc. 5th Eurographics Workshop on Visualization in Scientific Computing, Rostock, Germany, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Groff, J., Pollerman, B. WorldWideWeb: The Information Universe. Electronic Networking: Research, Applications and Policy, 1 (2): 52–58, Spring 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bönigk, J. System Architecture and Exchange Strategies for Mobile Visualization. In IMC’96 [7].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardelli, L. Obliq — A language with distributed scope. White Paper, Digital, Systems Research Center, March 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cattell, R.G.G. The Object Database Standard — ODMG’93. Morgan & Kaufmann, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, N., Blair, G., Cheverst, K., Friday, A. Supporting adaptive services in a heterogeneous mobile environment. In Proc. Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (MCSA’94),Santa Cruz, CA, December 8–9 1994. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proc. Workshop on Information Visualization and Mobile Computing (IMC’96), Rostock, Germany, February 26–27 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirste, T. An infrastructure for mobile information systems based on a fragmented object model. Distributed Systems Engineering Journal, 2 (3): 161–170, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirste, T. INCH — Ein Konzept für Interactive Computational Hypermedia auf der Basis einer funktionalen Objektinterpretation. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 1995. ISBN 3–8265–0748–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirste, T. The MoVi Project — Introduction and Modeling Concepts. In IMC’96 [7].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lange, S., Rauschenbach, U., Schumann, H. Alternatives for the presentation of information in a mobile environment. In IMC’96 [7].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malone, T.W., Lai, K.-Y., Frey, Ch. Experiments with Oval: A radically tailorable tool for cooperative work. ACM TOIS, 13 (2): 177–205, April 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McKeehan, J., Rhodes, N. Programming for the Newton. AP Professional, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minsky, M. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In Winston, P.H., editor, The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New-York, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NCSA. Mosaic. http://www. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nelson, T.H. Replacing the printed word: A complete literary system. In Lavington, S.H., editor, Proc. IFIP Congress 1980, pages 1013–1023. North-Holland, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelson, T.H. All for One and One for All. In Proc. Hypertext ‘87 (November 13–15 1987, Chappel Hill, North Carolina), pages v—vii. The Association for Computing Machinery, 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelson, T.H. Immense storage management. Byte, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts, R.B., Goldstein, I.P. The FRL Primer. AI Memo No. 408, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shibata, Y., Katsumoto, M. Dynamic Hypertext and Knowledga Agent Systems for Multimedia Information Networks. In Proc. Hypertext’93 (November 14–18 1993, Seattle, Washington), pages 83–93. The Association for Computing Machinery, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, W.R. The Newton Application Architecture. In Proc. IEEE Computer Conference, San Francisco, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steele Jr., G.L. Common Lisp: The Language. Digital Press, second edition, 1990.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ungar, D., Randall, B. Self: the power of simplicity. In Proc. OOPSLA’87 Conference, pages 227–241, Orlando, Florida, 1987. Published as SIGPLAN Notices 22, Dec. 1987.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waters, R.C. GPRINT: A LISP Pretty Printer Providing Extensive User Format-Control Mechanisms. AI Memo No. 611, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Kirste
    • 1
  1. 1.Interactive Graphics Systems GroupDarmstadt Technical UniversityDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations