Advertisement

Authoring a Large Distributed Hypermedia System: Document Linking and Embedding (DLE) concept

  • H. Maurer
  • F. Kappe
  • N. Scherbakov
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

In this paper we examine issues of collaborative authoring of large distributed hypermedia systems. We contend that there exists a certain discrepancy between the needs of local users engaged in hypermedia authoring tasks and the functionality provided by the distributed hypermedia system which creates and maintains a global view of the network. In this context we offer a so-called Document Linking and Embedding (DLE) concept. In accordance with this concept a number of documents can be gathered together into a new document, which can be embedded into other documents in turn. There exist two different dimensions of such logical structure: logical structure of a particular document (i.e. number of other documents related by means of computer navigable links); and global structure of a hypermedia database as such where documents are related by means of semantic relationships „is-a-part“. The DLE concept strongly separates authoring of these two logical structures. An experimental prototype system based upon this approach has been developed, the demonstration version is available via anonymous ftp from „iicm.tu-graz.ac.at“ in direcory „pub\hmcard“.

Keywords

Integrity Constraint Data Unit Semantic Relationship Registered Document Local Authoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abiteboul, S., Hull, R.: IFO-A formal semantic database model. ACM Trans. on Database Systems., 12 (4) (1987) pp. 525–565.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews K., Kappe F.: Strait-Jacketing Authors: User Interface Consistency in Large-Scale Hypermedia Systems. In: Frei, H.P., Schäuble (Eds.): Proc. Hypermedia’93, Springer (March 1993) pp 130–137.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berk, E., Devlin, J. (Eds.): Hypertext/Hypermedia Handbook. McGraw Hill Software Engineering Series, New York (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botafogo R B A, Shneidermann B.: Identifying Aggregates in Hypertext Structures. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (December 1991) pp 63–74.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bieber M.: ’Issues in Modelling a “Dynamic” Hypertext Interface for Non-Hypertext Systems’ In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (December 1991) pp 203–217.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casanova M A, et al.: The Nested Context Model for Hyperdocuments. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (December 1991) pp 193–201.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen P.: The Entity-Relationship approach: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems Vol 1 No 1 (January 1976) pp 9–36.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conklin E J.: Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey. IEEE Computer Vol 20 No 9 (September 1987) pp 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conklin E J, Begeman M L.: gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Argumentation. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol 6 No 4 (July 1988) pp 303–331Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Date C.J.: Introduction to Database Systems. 3rd Edition. Addison-Wesley Publ. Company (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Young L.: Links Considered Harmful. In Proc. ECHT90, Versailles, Cambridge University Press (November 1990) pp 238–249.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Furuta R, Stotts P D.: The Trellis Hypertext Reference Model. In Proc. of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop, Gaithersburg, (January 1990) pp 83–93.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garzotto F, Paolini P, Schwabe D.: HDM -A Model-Based Approach to Hypertext Application Design. ACM Transactions on Information Systems Vol 11 No 1 (January 1993) pp 1–26.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hull P., King R.: Semantic Database Modeling: Survey, applications and research issues. ACM Comput. Survey Vol 19 No 3 (October 1987) pp 201–260.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halasz F, Moran T, Trigg R.: NoteCards in a Nutshell. In Proc. ACM CHI’87 (1987) pp 45–42.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halasz F.: Reflection on Notecards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypermedia Systems. Communications of the ACM, Vol 31 No7 (July 1988) pp 836–852.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halasz F, Schwartz M.: The DEXTER Hypertext Reference Model. In Proc.of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop, Gaithersburg, (January 1990) pp 95–133.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kappe, F.: Aspects of a Modern Multi-Media Information System. IIG Report 308, Graz (1991).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kappel G, Schrefl M.: Local referential integrity. In Proc. Entity -Relationship Approach -ER’92, Karlsruhe, Germany, LNCS 645, Springer (1992) pp 41–57.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim W, Lochovski F H, (Eds.): Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications. Addison-Wesley (1989).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marmann M, Schageter G.: Towards a Better Support for Hypermedia Authoring: the HYDESIGN Approach. In Proc. ECHT’92, Fourth ACM Conference on Hypertext &Hypermedia, Milan (December 1992) pp 232–241.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marshall C C, et al.: Aquanet: a Hypertext Tool to Hold Your Knowledge in Place. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (December 1991) pp 261–276.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maurer H, Scherbakov N.: The HM Data Model. IIG Report, Graz (1993).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maurer H, Scherbakov N, Srinivasan P.: A New Hypermedia Data Model. In Proc. DEXA’93, Prague, Czech Rep., LNCS 720, Springer (1993) pp 685–696.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maurer H, et al.: Structured Browsing of Hypermedia Databases. In Proc. VCHCI’93, Vienna, LNCS 733, Springer (September 1993) pp 51–62.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maurer H, et al.: Object-Oriented Modeling of Hyperstructure: Overcoming the Static Link deficiency. Information and Software Technology (Special issue on Hypermedia September 1994) to be published.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nielsen J.: Hypertext and Hypermedia. Academic Press (1990).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panel Session: ‘Database Support for Hypertext’. In Proc. of the Fifteenth Int. Conf. on VLDB, (1989) pp 183.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parunak H V D.: Hypermedia Topologies and User Navigation. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’89, Pittsburgh (November 1989) pp 43–50.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parunak H V D.: Don’t Link Me In: Set Based Hypermedia for Taxonomic Reasoning. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (1991) pp 233–242.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roddick J F.: Schema Evolution in Database Systems -An Annotated Bibliography. ACM SIGMOD RECORD, Vol 21 No 4 (1992) pp 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schnase J.L., et al.: Semantic Data Modeling of Hypermedia Associations. ACM Transactions on Inform. Systems Vol 11 No 1 (January 1993) pp 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stotts P D, Furuta R.: Adding Browsing Semantics to the Hypertext Model. In Proc. ACM Document Processing Systems Conf., Santa Fe (1988) pp 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Streitz N, et al.: SEPIA: A Cooperative Hypermedia Authoring Environment. In Proc. ECHT92, Fourth ACM Conf. on Hypertext &Hypermedia, Milan (December 1992) pp 11–22.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thalheim B.: Fundamentals of Cardinality Constraints. In Proc. Entity -Relationship Approach -ER’92, Karlsruhe, Germany, LNCS 645, Springer (1992) pp 1–16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thuring M, Haake J M, Hannemann J.: What’s Eliza doing in the Chinese Room? Incoherent Hyperdocuments-and How to Avoid Them. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’91, San Antonio (December 1991) ppl61–177.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tomek I, et al.: Hypermedia -Introduction and Survey. Journal of MCA Vol 14 No 2 (March 1991) pp 63–103.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van Damm A.: Hypertext’87 Keynote Address. Communications of the ACM, Vol 31 No7 (July 1988) pp 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ullman D.: A Comparison Between Deductive and Object-Oriented Database Systems. In Proc. DOOD’91 (LNCS566), Springer (1991) pp 263–277.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yankelovich N, et al.: Intermedia: The Concept and the Construction of a Seamless Information Environment. IEEE Computer, Vol 21 Nol (January 1988) pp 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zellweger P T.: Scripted Documents: A Hypermedia Path Mechanism. In Proc. ACM Hypertext’89, Pittsburgh (November 1989) pp 1–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Maurer
    • 1
  • F. Kappe
    • 1
  • N. Scherbakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information Processing and Computer Supported New MediaGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations