Advertisement

Measurement of the NP→PPπ− Reaction at 443 MEV

  • M. G. Bachman
  • P. J. Riley
  • A. Amer
  • A. Berdoz
  • J. Birchall
  • J. Campbell
  • C. A. Davis
  • N. E. Davison
  • W. R. Falk
  • S. A. Page
  • W. D. Ramsay
  • A. Sekulovitch
  • D. A. Hutcheon
  • C. A. Miller
  • P. Green
  • E. Korkmaz
  • B. W. Mayes
  • L. Pinsky
  • Y. Tzamouranis
  • D. L. Adams
  • G. S. Mutchler
  • D. J. Margaziotis
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)

Abstract

We measured the relative differential cross section and analyzing powers A SO, A NO and A LO for the reaction np→ppπ− at an incident neutron energy of 443 MeV. The geometry of our detector allowed us to sample almost all the available phase-space. We reconstructed the full kinematics of each event from the measured trajectories of at least two of the three final state particles. Cuts based on the vertex reconstruction and kinematic χ2 allowed us to remove most background, primarily nn→npπ− from the target walls and other materials. These cuts gave a signal-to-noise ratio of 22:1, but fewer than 3% of the total data survived the cuts. The resulting ~400,000 np→ppπ− were binned against p-p invariant mass and angles which are most suited to partial waves analysis. Comparisons are made to predictions of the model of Kloet and Lomon. These observables represent the first measurements of their kind at this energy and it is hoped that their determination will allow us to extract the role of isospin-0 amplitudes in the process of pion production.

Keywords

Differential Cross Section Partial Wave Neutron Beam Partial Wave Analysis Spin Observable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. J. VerWest and R. A. Arndt: Phys. Rev. C25, 1979 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bystricky, et al.: J. Physique 48, 1901 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. B. Yodh: Phys. Rev. 98, 1330 (1955); R. Handler: Phys. Rev. 138, 1230 (1965); H. Fischer, et al.: SIN Newsletter 20, NL15 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Ponting, et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1792 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Terrien, et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. B294, 40 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. M. Kloet and E. L. Lomon: Phys. Rev. C43, 1575 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Bachman
    • 1
  • P. J. Riley
    • 1
  • A. Amer
    • 2
  • A. Berdoz
    • 2
  • J. Birchall
    • 2
  • J. Campbell
    • 2
  • C. A. Davis
    • 2
  • N. E. Davison
    • 2
  • W. R. Falk
    • 2
  • S. A. Page
    • 2
  • W. D. Ramsay
    • 2
  • A. Sekulovitch
    • 2
  • D. A. Hutcheon
    • 3
  • C. A. Miller
    • 3
  • P. Green
    • 4
  • E. Korkmaz
    • 4
  • B. W. Mayes
    • 5
  • L. Pinsky
    • 5
  • Y. Tzamouranis
    • 5
  • D. L. Adams
    • 6
  • G. S. Mutchler
    • 6
  • D. J. Margaziotis
    • 7
  1. 1.University of TexasAustinUSA
  2. 2.University of ManitobaCanada
  3. 3.TRIUMFCanada
  4. 4.University of AlbertaCanada
  5. 5.University of HoustonUSA
  6. 6.Rice UniversityUSA
  7. 7.California State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations