Exclusive Electron Scattering from Deuterium at High Q2

  • J. F. J. van den Brand
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)


Cross sections are presented for the reaction 2H(e,e’p)n for momentum transfers in the range 1.0 ≤ Q 2 ≤ 6.8 (GeV/c)2 and for missing momenta from 0 to 250 MeV/c. The longitudinal-transverse interference structure function has been separated at Q 2 = 1.2 (GeV/c)2. The observables are compared to calculations performed in non-relativistic and relativistic frameworks. The best description of the data is found using a fully relativistic treatment.


Impulse Approximation Free Nucleon Reduced Cross Section Cerenkov Detector Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A.H. Mueller, Proc. of the Moriond Conference, 1982; S.J. Brodsky, XIII Int. Symp. on Multiparticle Dynamics, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L.Ya. Glozman et al., Phys. Lett. B252, 23 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. van der Schaar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 776 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. van der Schaar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2855 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.J. Brodsky and G.L. Farrar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1153 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Frullani and J. Mougey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 14, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.A. Tjon, Few-Body Systems Suppl. 5, 17 (1992); E. Hummel and J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C42, 423 (1990); E. Hummel, Ph. D. thesis, Rijks Universiteit Utrecht (1991), unpublished.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Blankenbeckler and R. Sugar, Phys. Rev. 142, 1051 (1966); A.A. Logunov and A. N. Tavkhelidze, Nuovo Cim. 29, 380 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.L. Foldy and S.A. Wouthuysen, Phys. Rev. 78, 29 (1950).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, Nucl Phys A517, 483 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Goiler and H. Arenhövel, Few-Body Systems 13, 117 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K.W. McVoy and L. van Hove, Phys. Rev 125, 1034 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. de Forest, Jr., Nucl. Phys. A392, 232 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14]
    N. Makins et al., private communications.Google Scholar
  15. 15]
    D. Wasson et al., to be published;Google Scholar
  16. [6]
    L.W. Mo and Y-S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 205 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Makins, T. O’Neill et al., private communications.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    N.N. Nikolaev, private communications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. J. van den Brand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations