Advertisement

Separation of Electromagnetic Response Functions of Few-Body Nuclei in (e,e’p) Reactions

  • C. Marchand
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)

Abstract

We report on latest results in electro-induced reactions on few-body nuclei, especially recent experimental determinations of the cross sections for the reactions 2H(e,e’p)n and 3He(e,e’p)2H for which three out of four electromagnetic structure functions have been separated. These new precise data allow a thorough study of the reaction mechanism of the (e,e’p) reaction at momentum transfers up to one GeV. The data are compared to theoretical descriptions of the (e,e’p) cross sections which include final state interactions, meson exchange currents and relativistic effects by consistently solving the scattering problem. We will discuss the relevance of FSI at low q and the importance of a relativistic treatment of the current operator at high q and the longitudinal-transverse interference structure function.

Keywords

Structure Function Spectral Function Final State Interaction Recent Experimental Determination Meson Exchange Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Lapikas: Nucl. Phys. A553, 297c. (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. van den Brand et al: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2006 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. van den Brand et al: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 409 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.M. Laget: Nucl. Phys. A497, 391c. (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Magnon et al: Phys. Lett. B222, 352 (1989). J.E. Ducret et al: Nucl. Phys. A556, 373 (1993).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Frullani and J. Mougey: Adv. Nucl. Phys. 14, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. de Forest: Nucl. Phys. A392, 232 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.M. Laget: Phys. Lett. B 199, 493 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Mosconi and P. Ricci: Nucl. Phys. A517, 483 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Beck and H. Arenhövel: Few Body Syst. 13, 165 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Laget: Phys. Lett. B 151, 325 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. van Meijgaard and J.A. Tjon: Phys. Rev. C42, 74 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Arenhovel: Nucl. Phys. A384, 287 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Hummel and J.A. Tjon: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1788 (1989); Phys. Rev. C42, 423 (1990) and to be published.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. van der Schaar et al: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2855 1991.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.E. Ducret et al: Nucl. Phys. A553, 697c (1993) and to be published.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Lakehal-Ayat et al: 5th Workshop on Perspectives in Nuclear Physics at Intermediate Energies, Eds S. Boffi et al, Trieste, May 1991, p.218; Nucl. Phys. A553, 693c (1993) and to be published.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Schiavilla, V.R. Pandharipande and R.B. Wiringa: Nucl. Phys. A449, 219 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. van der Schaar et al: Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 776 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Marchand
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de Physique Nucléaire (DAPNIA/SPhN)Centre d’Etude de SaclayGif-Sur-Yvette CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations