Results of (e,e’x) experiments on 4He

  • H. P. Blok
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)


Results of (e,e’x) (x=p,n,d,t,3He) experiments on 4He are discussed. The description of the final continuum state seems to be a crucial ingredient. Charge exchange plays an important role in the 1N and 3N knockout reactions. A microscopic description of the (e,e’d) reaction largely overstimates the measured cross section, presumably because the description of the final state is too simple.


Charge Exchange Spectral Function Optical Potential Virtual Photon Calculated Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Frullani and J. Mougey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 14, 1 (1984)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Boffi, C. Giusti and F.D. Pacati, Phys. Rep. 226, 1 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.F.J, van den Brand, Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1988Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.F.J, van den Brand et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2006 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.F.J, van den Brand et al., Nucl. Phys. A534, 637 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 835 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Warmann and K. Langanke, Phys. Lett. B273, 193 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Buballa et al, Phys. Rev. C44, 810 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Schiavilla, V. R. Pandharipande and R. B. Wiringa, Nucl. Phys. A449, 219 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W.T.H. van Oers et al., Phys. Rev. C25, 390 (1982)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. van der Steenhoven et al., Phys. Lett. B191, 227 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.F.J, van den Brand et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 409 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J.J.M. Steijger et al, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A295, 123 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Daman, Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1991Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E. van Meijgaard and J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C42, 96 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Magnon et al., Phys. Lett. B222, 352 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J.M. Legoff et al., Proc. 4th Workshop on Perspectives in Nuclear Physics at Intermediate Energies, Trieste, 1989, p. 376 see also: E. Jans, Nucl. Phys. A508, 433c (1990)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Ent, Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1990 and R. Ent et al, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Ent et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 18 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    H. Morita, Y. Akaishi and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79, 863 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    W. Leidemann et al, Phys. Lett. B279, 212 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. Ent et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2367 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Warmann and K. Langanke, Z. f. Physik A342, 489 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. Gloeckle et al, to be published in Proc. Workshop on Electron-nucleus scattering, Elba, July 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. P. Blok
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.NIKHEF-KAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations