Advertisement

Electron Scattering from Polarized Deuterium at VEPP-3

  • C. E. Jones
  • K. P. Coulter
  • R. Gilman
  • R. J. Holt
  • E. R. Kinney
  • R. S. Kowalczyk
  • D. H. Potterveld
  • L. Young
  • V. V. Frolov
  • S. I. Mishnev
  • D. M. Nikolenko
  • S. G. Popov
  • I. A. Rachek
  • D. K. Toporkov
  • E. P. Tsentalovich
  • B. B. Wojtsekhowski
  • C. W. de Jager
  • G. Retzlaff
  • J. Theunissen
  • H. de Vries
  • V. V. Nelyubin
  • V. V. Vikhrov
  • V. N. Stibunov
  • A. V. Osipov
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)

Abstract

The experiment to measure the tensor analyzing power T 20 of the deuteron using a tensor-polarized internal target at the VEPP-3 electron storage ring in Novosibirsk is currently in its second phase. Tensor-polarized deuterium atoms from an atomic beam source feed an active storage cell in the electron ring, serving as the target for a beam of 2 GeV unpolarized electrons. Analysis of the first Phase 2 data in the kinematic range Q 2 = 0.36 − 0.50 (GeV/c)2 is reported here. Plans for the third phase of the experiment, which will use a high-density, laser-driven polarized deuterium target, are also discussed. The measurement of T20 from the second and third phases of the experiment will cover the kinematic region 0.36 ≤ q ≤ 0.90 (GeV/c)2 where T 20 is particularly sensitive to isoscalar meson exchange currents.

Keywords

Form Factor Impulse Approximation Deuteron Wave Function Charge Form Factor Tensor Analyze Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See, for example, the contribution of P. U. Sauer and of S. J. Wallace.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. The et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 173 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Schiavilla and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C 43, 437 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. G. Blunden et al, Phys. Rev. C 40, 1541 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. L. Chung et al, Phys. Rev. C 37, 2000 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Hummel and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1788 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stanley J. Brodsky and John R. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2141 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. E. Schulze et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 597 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. F. Dmitriev et al, Phys. Lett. 157B, 143 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Gilman et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1733 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Schiavilla, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C 41, 309 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Amroun et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 253 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Henning, J. Adams, Jr., P. U. Sauer, and A. Stadler, submitted to Phys. Rev. C.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    George Rupp and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 45, 2133 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Gilman et al, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A327, 277 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Poelker et al, ANL Preprint Phy-7140-ME-93.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. V. Evstigneev, S. G. Popov, and D. K. Toporkov, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A238, 12 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Jones
    • 1
  • K. P. Coulter
    • 1
  • R. Gilman
    • 1
  • R. J. Holt
    • 1
  • E. R. Kinney
    • 1
  • R. S. Kowalczyk
    • 1
  • D. H. Potterveld
    • 1
  • L. Young
    • 1
  • V. V. Frolov
    • 2
  • S. I. Mishnev
    • 2
  • D. M. Nikolenko
    • 2
  • S. G. Popov
    • 2
  • I. A. Rachek
    • 2
  • D. K. Toporkov
    • 2
  • E. P. Tsentalovich
    • 2
  • B. B. Wojtsekhowski
    • 2
  • C. W. de Jager
    • 3
  • G. Retzlaff
    • 3
  • J. Theunissen
    • 3
  • H. de Vries
    • 3
  • V. V. Nelyubin
    • 4
  • V. V. Vikhrov
    • 4
  • V. N. Stibunov
    • 5
  • A. V. Osipov
    • 5
  1. 1.Argonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA
  2. 2.Budker Institute for Nuclear PhysicsNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.NIKHEFAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.St. Petersburg Institute for Nuclear PhysicsGatchinaRussia
  5. 5.Tomsk Polytechnic InstituteTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations