Electron Scattering with Polarized 3He Targets

  • R. D. McKeown
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 7)


The recent development of polarized 3He targets for use in electron scattering experiments has opened up a wide range of possibilities for new experiments. A variety of fundamental issues in both nucleon structure and the nuclear structure of 3He will be addressed in these experiments. Some recent preliminary measurements as well as several new proposals will be discussed.


Final State Interaction Final State Hadron Quasielastic Scattering Target Spin Longitudinal Asymmetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Donnelly, T.W., Raskin, A.S., Annals of Physics 169, 247 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raskin, A.S., Donnelly, T.W., Annals of Physics 191, 78 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meziani, Z.E., these proceedings.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milner, R.G., McKeown, R.D., Woodward, C.E., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A257, 286 (1987); and Nucl. Instrum. Methods A274, 56 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otten, E., Heil, W., private communication.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chupp, T.E., et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 187, 1320 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blankleider, B., Woloshyn, R.M., Phys. Rev. C29, 538 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friar, J.L. et al., Phys. Rev. C43, 2310 (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ciofi degli Atti, C., Pace, E., Salme, G., Phys. Rev. C46, R1591 (1992); proceedings of the workshop on “Perspectives in Nuclear Physics at Intermediate Energies,” to be published (World Scientific, Singapore).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulze, R, Sauer, P., Phys. Rev. C48, 38 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Meijgaard, E., Tjon, J.A., Phys. Lett. B228, 307 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woodward, C.E. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 698 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, C.E. et al., Phys. Rev. C47, 110 (1993).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson, A.K. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2910 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beck, D. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1537 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bates proposal 88–25, Chupp, T., Milner, R., spokesmen; Bates proposal 89–12, Milner, R.G., van den Brand, J., spokesmen.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    CEBAF proposal 91-020, McKeown, R, spokesman.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laget, J.M., Phys. Lett. B273, 367 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laget, J.M., private communication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klein, F., private communication; Walcher, T., these proceedings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. McKeown
    • 1
  1. 1.W. K. Kellogg Radiation LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations