Techniques to Improve the Performances of an Industrial SCARA Robot

  • R. Faglia
  • C. Remino
Conference paper
Part of the Schriftenreihe der Wissenschaftlichen Landesakademie für Niederösterreich book series (AKADNIEDERÖSTER)


This paper suggests some techniques to improve the performances of industrial SCARA robots. Such techniques are:
  1. 1)

    a method of calibration based on optical measurement, which increases the robot accuracy;

  2. 2)

    a parametric definition of the actuators motions, which optimizes the dynamic behaviour of the robot.

Both techniques can be applied on-field, when the manipulator is operative.


Robot Manipulator Structural Error Acceleration Peak Optimal Motion Motion Profile 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cai M.S., Rovetta A. (1988). Linear and angular position, velocity and acceleration error analysis for robot manipulators and their compensation, Proceedings of IEEE Intern. Workshop on Intelligent Robot and Systems ’88, Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Denavit J., Hartenberg R.S. (1955). A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices, In: Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 22, pp.215–221, June.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Faglia R., Legnani G. (1989). Dynamic Analysis of SCARA Robots for Optimal Motions with Low-Cost Controller. Proc. Second Congress IF AC “Low-cost Automation” 8–10 November 1989, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  4. Faglia R., Legnani G. (1991). On the dynamic behaviour of robots with non-rigid transmission. Proc. VIII IFToMM, Praha, 26–31 August 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Faglia R., Legnani G., Docchio F., Minoni U. (1992a). Experimental evaluation of the joint axes misalignment in a SCARA robot by optical measurements. In: Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 1, 1992, pp. 301–314.Google Scholar
  6. Faglia R., Legnani G. (1992b). Harmonic Drive transmissions: the effects of their elasticity, clearance and irregularity on the dynamic behaviour of an actual SCARA robot. In: Robotica (1992) Volume 10, pp 369–375.Google Scholar
  7. Faglia R. (1992c). Trajectory shaping for flexible manipulators: an optimization algorithm and an application to a SCARA robot. Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Robot Kinematics 3rd ARK, September 7–9, 1992, Ferrara, Italy.Google Scholar
  8. Faglia R., Legnani G., Magnani P.L., Docchio F., Minoni U. (1993). Calibration of SCARA robot by optical measurements: methodology and experimental results. Proc. ISMCR 1993, Torino, 21–24 Sept. 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Ibrahim M. Y., Cook C., Tieu K. (1988). Dynamic behaviour of a SCARA robot with links subjected to different velocity trajectories. In: Robotica (1988) volume 6, pp. 115–121.Google Scholar
  10. Mooring B.W., Roth Z.S., Driels M.R. (1991). Fundamentals of manipulator calibration. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
  11. Nowrouzi A., Kavina Y.V., Kochekali H., Whitaker R.A. (1988). An overview of robot calibration techniqes. In: Ind. Robot (UK), vol.15, no.4, Dec. 1988, pp. 229–232.Google Scholar
  12. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teuklosky S.A., Vetterling W.T. (1986). Numerical recipes. The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schmitt, Soni, Srinivasan, Naganathan (1985). Optimal Motion Programming of Robot Manipulators. In: ASME Trans. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, Vol. 107/239, June 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Faglia
    • 1
  • C. Remino
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department UniversityBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations