Advertisement

Patient Data Management Systems in Europe — A Comparative Study

  • P. G. H. Metnitz
  • K. Lenz
Part of the Intensivmedizinisches Seminar book series (INTENSIVM.SEM., volume 6)

Abstract

The development of new technologies for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in intensive care combined with the introduction of microprocessor technology has led to an enormous increase in data collection at ICUs [1, 2]. We have already reached a point where the manual handling of these amounts of data is very hard to manage [3]. The comparison of a hospital with a bank [4] by Groom and Harris in 1990 has become famous in this context. To measure the computing demands of a hospital, they looked at the number of transaction performed daily. They found that a hospital with an average census of 300 beds had the same amount of transactions as a state-wide bank with 150 branches. Further they tried to locate the demands of different units. 60% of the computing power, according to Groom and Harris, are needed by data intensive units, such as operating theatres, ICUs and laboratories (Fig. 1).

Keywords

Data Security Service Contract Device Driver Peripheral Device User Friendliness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Annotations and References

  1. [1]
    Smith BE (1990) Universities and the clinical monitoring industry: Feckless independents or fruitful partners? Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 7: 249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bowes CL, Ambroso C, Carson ER, Chambrin MC, Cramp D, Gilhooly K, et al (1992) INFORM: Development of information management and decision support systems for High Dependency Environments. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 8: 295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kalli S, Ambroso C, Gregory R, Heikelä A, Ilomäki A, Leaning M, et al (1992) Inform: Conceptual modelling of intensive care information systems. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 9: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Groom DA, Harris JW (1990) Evaluation and selection of systems for automatic clinical operations. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology May/June: 173–185Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ambroso C, Bowes C, Chambrin MC, Gilhooly K, Green C, Kari A, et al (1992) INFORM: European survey of computers in Intensive Care Units. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 9: 53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Leaning MS, Yates CE, Patterson DLH, Ambroso C, Collinson PO, Kalli ST (1991) A data model for intensive care. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 8: 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shabot M (1989) Clinical systems as a focal point for distributed patient data. The Impact of Information Systems on Critical Care: A Look into the Future. Hewlett Packard, pp. 9–13Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Imhoff M, Piotrowski A, Reuß M (1992) Klinischer Einsatz eines Unix-basierten Klinischen Informationssystems für die Intensivmedizin. Biomedical Journal 34: 8–12Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    See ref. [4]Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    See ref. [6]Google Scholar
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    GUI: Graphical User Interface, like MS Windows, or X-Windows or Apple’s System 7Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    If you are interested in that, contact e.g. Dr. Pollwein, MunichGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    See also the paper of Martin et al. in this bookGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    MPEG: Motion Picture Expert Group; for further information see informatic issues, e.g.: Bertuch M (1993) Living bits on disc. CT, Magazin für Computer und Technologie 7: 118–120Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Nathe M (1992) Communication Standards. Proceeding of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the ESCTAIC, October 1992, p. X1Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Iaccobucci E (1989) Das OS/2 Buch. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    LAN: Local Area NetworkGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    See also chapter 4Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    UPS: Uninterruptable Power SupplyGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Paganelli BE (1989) Criteria for the Selection of a Beside Information System for Acute Care Units. Computers in Nursing 7: 214–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    File server: a central computer in a network which holds the main-databaseGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Backup: copying your data to a (hopefully) secure place, e.g. an optical discGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Graphical user interface for UNIXGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    MT: Medical-Technical DevicesGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    This system provides limited possibility to display sections in graphic format: it is possible to configure six different screens with any combination of measured valuesGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    In this system, all value displays are graphical displaysGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    No ventilators connected to this test-site until nowGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    To process medications, care-activities etc., you must buy the module I.N.C.A., which provides full PDMS-functionality in combination with the Atlantis systemGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    At entering a medicationGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    At entering a medicationGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Usual in American systems: after selecting a care-diagnosis there is a set of care-activities automatically generated, a so called care-plan; it can be edited if neededGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Graphical display of the human body, which gives the nurses the possibility to select and mark different points with an input device, e.g. a mouse, and to describe the condition of the patient; this should simulate the situation as given in written documentationGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    When producing a transfer report e.g.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    At this ward an external reporting-program was configured; if you don’t have programming-engineers available it is recommendable to buy the module “Hospiprint”, which acts as a print-server module. With this module you can configure any report you needGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    With module HospiimageGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    But 24 -hours storage at HP-Merlin monitors; from there, the data can be takenGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Until the database becomes full; then the oldest patient data are deletedGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    You can convert the ASCII-data-sets into any databaseGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    These marks the possibility to display some valuable information during recording data; e.g. as you enter the prescribed cardiovascular medications, you would maybe like to see the trend of the HR and MAP of the last hours; systems with a “yes” have the ability to display such additional information in a window;Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    I.N.C.A.: Integrated Nursing Care ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    CAREVUE, ATLANTIS and at the moment: CLINISOFTGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    See also the paper of Wilding later in this bookGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    EURISIC: European Users Requirements for an Information System for Intensive CareGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Clemmer T, Gardner RM (1992) Medical informatics in the intensive care unit: State of the art 1991. Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing 8: 237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. G. H. Metnitz
    • 1
  • K. Lenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Inner Medicine IV, Intensive Care UnitUniversity of ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations