Fluid- and Gasdynamics pp 113-123 | Cite as

# Multiplicative models for turbulent energy dissipation

## Summary

We consider models for describing the intermittent distribution of the energy dissipation rate per unit mass, *ε*, in high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows. These models are based on a physical picture in which (in one-dimensional space) an eddy of scale *r* breaks into *b* smaller eddies of scale *r/b*. The energy flux across scales of size *r* is *rε* _{ r }, where *ε* _{ r } is the average of *ε* over a linear interval of size *r*. This energy flux can be written as the product of factors called multipliers. We discuss some properties of the distribution of multipliers. Using measured multiplier distributions obtained from atmospheric surface layer data on *ε*, we show that quasi-deterministic models (multiplicative models) can be developed on a rational basis for multipliers with bases *b =* 2 and 3 (that is, binary and tertiary breakdown processes). This formalism allows a unified understanding of some apparently unrelated previous work, and its simplicity permits the derivation of explicit analytic expressions for quantities such as the probability density function of *rε* _{ r }, which agree very well with measurements. Other related applications of multiplier distributions are presented. The limitations of this approach are discussed when bases larger than three are invoked.

## Keywords

Energy Dissipation Energy Flux Energy Dissipation Rate Multiplicative Model Inertial Range## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]Kolmogorov, A. N.: Local structure of turbulence in in an incompressible fluid at very high Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR
**30**, 299–303 (1941).ADSGoogle Scholar - [2]Sreenivasan, K. R.: Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**23**, 539 – 600 (1992).Google Scholar - [3]Meneveau, C., Sreenivasan, K. R.: Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**59**, 1424 –1427 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - [4]Meneveau, C., Sreenivasan, K. R.: The multifractal nature of energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech.
**224**, 429–484 (1991).CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar - [5]Chhabra, A. B., Sreenivasan, K. R.: Scale-invariant multiplier distributions in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**62**, 2762 – 2765 (1992).Google Scholar - [6]Mandelbrot, B. B.: Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: Divergence of high moments and dimensions of the carrier. J. Fluid Mech.
**62**, 331– 358 (1974).MATHGoogle Scholar - [7]Schertzer, D., Lovejoy, S.: Nonlinear variability in geophysics. Dordrecht: Kluwer 1991.Google Scholar
- [8]Frisch, U., Parisi, G.: On the singularity structure of fully developed turbulence. In: Turbulence and predictability in geophysical fluid dynamics and climate dynamics (Ghil, M., Benzi, R., Parisi, G.), pp. 84–88. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1985; Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I., Shraiman, B. I.: Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets. Phys. Rev.
**A 33**, 1141–1151 (1986).Google Scholar - [9]Kailasnath, P., Sreenivasan, K. R., Stolovitzky, G.: Probability density of velocity increments in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**68**, 2766–2769 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - [10]Kolmogorov, A. N.: Energy dissipation in locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 19–21 (1941).Google Scholar
- [11]Rey Pastor, J., Pi Calleja, P., Trejo, C.: Analisis matematico, vol I. Kapelusz: Buenos Aires, 1957.Google Scholar
- [12]Vicsek, T, Barabâsi, A.-L.: Multi-affine model for the velocity distribution in fully turbulent flows. J. Phys. A,
**24**, L845 – L851 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - [13]Kolmogorov, A. N.: A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82–85 (1962).CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [14]Novikov, E. A.: Intermittency and scale similarity in the structure of a turbulent flow. Prikl. Mat. Mekh.
**35**, 266–277 (1971).Google Scholar - [15]Stolovitzky, G., Kailasnath, P., Sreenivasan, K. R.: Kolmogorov’s refined similarity hypotheses. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**69**, 1178 –1181 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar