Skip to main content

Immunogenicity of poliovirus vaccines with special reference to the choice between oral and inactivated vaccines in developing countries

  • Chapter
Book cover Measles and Poliomyelitis
  • 162 Accesses

Summary

Both inactivated and oral poliovirus vaccines have successfully eradicated poliomyelitis in the developed world. Inactivated vaccine may appear to have some advantages for the developing world, particularly with regard to interference and greater stability, but fails to address the major reservoir of faecal-orally spread virus, the gastrointestinal tract. Inactivated vaccine used to supplement oral vaccine schedules increases cost and could cause confusion in adminis tration. Interference in oral vaccine schedules could be addressed by a supplementary neonatal dose. In most of Africa, type 1 poliovirus is the dominant endemic strain and also the cause of outbreaks, and neonatal supplementation with type 1 would have particular advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kok PW, Leeuwenburg J, Tukei P, van Wezel AL, Kapsenberg JG, van Steenis G, Galazka A, Robertson SE, Robinson D (1992) Serological and virological assessment of oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines in a rural population in Kenya. Bull WHO 70:93–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson S, Schoub BD, McAnerney JM, Gear JSS, Moodie JM, Garrity SL, Klaassen KIM ,Küstner HGV (1984) Poliomyelitis outbreak in South Africa ,1982. II. Laboratory and vaccine aspects. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 78: 26–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoub BD, Johnson S, McAnerney JM, Küstner HGV, van der Merwe GA (1986) A comprehensive investigation of immunity to poliomyelitis in a developing country. Am J Epidemiol 123: 316–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoub BD, Johnson S, McAnerney JM, van Middelkoop A, Küstner HGV, Windsor I, Vinsen C, McDonald K (1992) Poliomyelitis outbreak in Natal/KwaZulu, South Africa, 1987–1988. 2. Immunity aspects. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 86:83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim-Farley RJ, Rutherford G, Lichfield P, Hsu S-T, Orenstein WA, Schonberger LB, Bart KJ, Lui K-J, Lin C-C (1984) Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis, Taiwan. Lancet ii: 1322–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organizaiton (1989) Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI). Poliomyelitis in 1986,1987 and 1988, Part I. Wkly Epidem Rec 64: 273–279

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sutter RW, Patriarca PA, Brogan S, Malankar PG, Pallansch MA, Kew OM, Bass AG, Cochi SL, Alexander JP, Hall DB, Suleiman AJM, Al-Ghassany AAK, El-Bualy MS (1991) Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman: evidence for widespread transmission among fully vaccinated children. Lancet 338: 715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Middelkoop A, van Wyk JE, Küstner HGV, Windsor I, Vinsen C, Schoub BD, Johnson S, McAnerney JM (1992) Poliomyelitis outbreak in Natal/KwaZulu, South Africa, 1987–1988. I. Epidemiology. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 86:80–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hovi T (1989) The outbreak of poliomyelitis in Finland in 1984–1985. Significance of antigenic variation of type 3 polioviruses and site-specificity of antibody responses in antipolio immunization. Adv Virus Res 37: 243–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (1984) Poliomyelitis outbreak in Israel. Wkly Epidem Rec 63:325–326

    Google Scholar 

  11. Onorato IM, Modlin JF, McBean AM, Thoms ML, Losonsky GA, Bernier RH (1991) Mucosal immunity induced by enhanced-potency inactivated and oral polio vaccines. J Infect Dis 163: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of National Health, South Africa (1990) The six vaccine-preventable diseases. Epidem Comments 17: 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tulchinsky T, Abed Y, Shaheen S, Toubassi N, Sever Y, Schoenbaum M, Handsher R (1989) A ten-year experience in control of poliomyelitis through a combination of live and killed vaccines in two developing areas. Am J Public Health 79: 1648–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization Expanded Programme on Immunization (1985) Global advisory group. Wkly Epidem Rec 60: 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schoub BD, Johnson S, McAnerney J, Gilbertson L, Klaassen KIM, Reinach SG (1988) Monovalent neonatal polio immunization -a strategy for the developing world. J Infect Dis 157: 836–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schoub, B.D. (1993). Immunogenicity of poliovirus vaccines with special reference to the choice between oral and inactivated vaccines in developing countries. In: Kurstak, E. (eds) Measles and Poliomyelitis. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9278-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9278-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82436-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-9278-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics