Advertisement

The role of anatomic information in quantifying functional neuroimaging data

  • C. Bohm
  • T. Greitz
  • L. Thurfjell
Part of the Journal of Neural Transmission book series (NEURAL SUPPL, volume 37)

Summary

When using modern neuroimaging tools, such as CT, PET, SPECT, MRI and MEG, in brain research and brain diagnostics, there is a common need for including external anatomical information into the interpretation and analysis of data. This information may be used to aid the interpretation of structures in images from low resolution imaging tools. With high resolution tools it can help to identify resolved structures. It can also facilitate the merging of data from different modalities, or from different individuals. The anatomical information is often given as regions of interests (ROIs), which may be manually created from an anatomy rich image or automatically created from a standard template collection or from an atlas data base. Automatic methods will lead to a substantial reduction in bias and in size of the systematic errors. Functional ROIs can correspondingly be derived from functional images (usually PET or SPECT). Different aspects of these processes are discussed in the report.

Keywords

Positron Emission Tomography Positron Emission Tomography Image Partial Volume Effect Anatomic Information Brain Atlas 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bajcsy R, Lieberson R, Reivich M (1983) A computerized system for the elastic matching of deformed radiographic images to idealized atlas images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7: 618–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohm C, Greitz T, Kingsley D, Berggren BM, Olsson L (1983) Adjustable computerized stereotaxic brain atlas for transmission and emission tomography. Am J Neuroradiol 4: 731–733PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohm C, Greitz T, Berggren BM (1985) Selection of PET ROIs from a computerized brain atlas. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 5 [Suppl] 1: S613 - S614Google Scholar
  4. Bohm C, Greitz T, Blomqvist G, Farde L, Forsgren PO, Kingsley D, Sjögren I, Wiesel FA, Wik G (1986) Applications of a computerized adjustable brain atlas in positron emission tomography. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 369: 449–452Google Scholar
  5. Bohm C, Greitz T, Seitz R, Eriksson L (1991) Specification and selection of regions of interest (ROIs) in a computerized brain atlas. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 11: A64 - A68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans AC, Beil C, Marett S, Thompson C, Hakim A (1988) Anatomical-functional correlation using an adjustable MRI-based region of interest atlas with positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 8: 513–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox PT, Perlmutter JS, Raichle ME (1985) A stereotactic method of localization for positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9: 141–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox PT, Mintun MA, Reinman EM, Raichle ME (1988) Enhanced detection of focal brain responses using intersubject PET images. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 8: 642–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Lammertsma AA, Dolan RD, Frackowiak RSJ (1989) The relationship between local and global changes in PET scan. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 10: 458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ (1991) Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 11: 690–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greitz T, Bohm C, Eriksson L, Mogard J, Roland PE, Seitz RJ, Wiesel FA (1989) The construction of a functional brain atlas: elimination of bias from anatomical variations at PET by reformatting three-dimensional data into a standardized anatomy. In: Ottoson D, Rostene W (eds) Visualization of brain functions. Macmillan, London, pp 137–140 (Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium, vol 53 )Google Scholar
  12. Greitz T, Bohm C, Holte S, Eriksson L (1991) A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15: 26–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maguire GQ, Noz ME, Rusinek H, Jaeger J, Kramer EL, Sanger JJ, Smith G (1991) Graphics applied to medical image registration. Comput Graph Appl 2 /2: 20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mazziotta JC (1984) Physiologic neuroanatomy. New brain imaging methods present a challenge to an old discipline. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 4: 481–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazziotta JC, Phelps ME, Plummer D, Kuhl DE (1981) Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography. 5. Physical-anatomical effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 734–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery DC (1983) Design and analysis of experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 32–36Google Scholar
  17. Seitz RJ, Bohm C, Greitz T, Roland PE, Eriksson L, Blomqvist G, Rosenkvist G, Nordell B (1990) Accuracy and precision of the computerized brain atlas program for localization and quantification in positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 10: 443–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Bohm
    • 1
  • T. Greitz
    • 2
  • L. Thurfjell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Departments of NeuroradiologyKarolinska Institute/HospitalStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Image AnalysisUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations