Color-coded Doppler sonography of dialysis fistulas

  • P. Hübsch
  • S. Trattnig


Current therapeutic options for the treatment of chronic uremia require a multidisciplinary approach in which nephrologists, urologists and other surgeons, and radiologists must work together to achieve maximum benefit for the patient. Because of the interventional techniques now available, the radiologist has a very active role to play in the treatment of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas. The main purpose of this chapter is to describe the potential diagnostic value of color-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS) in the noninvasive evaluation of hemodialysis fistulas. It should be noted that angiography (preferably digital subtraction angiography) still holds its position as a “gold standard” shunt evaluation method and can provide more accurate and complete information than CCDS. The two procedures probably have a complementary role to play, as is often the case when new medical diagnostic modalities become available. In the following sections we will discuss the typical appearance of pathologic changes occurring in dialysis fistulas and will also note the difficulties which can be encountered when using CCDS in the diagnostic work-up of patients with shunt malfunction.


Radial Artery Subclavian Vein Vessel Lumen Cephalic Vein Ulnar Artery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arlart IP, Merk J, Eichner H (1985) DSA mittels Feinnadelpunktion zum Ausschluß vaskulärer Komplikationen bei Hämodialyse-Shunts. Röntgenpraxis 38: 200–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, et al (1966) Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 275: 1089–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cada E, Kamel F, Mayer G, Längle F, Schurawitzki H, Graf H (1989) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of failing arteriovenous dialysis fistulae. Nephrol Dial Transplant 4: 57–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cimochowski GE, Worley E, Rutherford WE, Sartain J, Blondin J, Harter H (1990) Superiority of the internal jugular over the subclavian access for temporary dialysis. Nephron 54: 154–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan H, Ferguson L, Faris I (1986) Incidence of the radial steal syndrome in patients with Brescia fistula for hemodialysis: Its clinical significance. J Vasc Surg 4: 144–147Google Scholar
  6. Erasmi H, Neufang KFR, Schmitz-Rixen Th, de Vleeschauwer Ph, Horsch S (1985) Erfahrungen mit der digitalen Subtraktionsangiographie ( DSA) bei Dialyse-Shunt-Komplikationen. Vasa 14: 144–148Google Scholar
  7. Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KMH, Hong J, Lipkowitz GS (1987) The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the management of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg 206: 777–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hubsch PJ, Stiglbauer RL, Schwaighofer BW, Kainberger FM, Barton PP (1988) Internal jugular and subclavian vein thrombosis caused by central venous catheters. Evaluation using Doppler blood-flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med 7: 629–636Google Scholar
  9. Jameson MD, Wiegmann TB (1990) Principles, uses, and complications of hemodialysis. Med Clin North Am 74: 945–960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kathrein H, König P, Weimann S, Judmaier G, Dittrich P (1989) Nichtinvasive morphologische und funktionelle Beurteilung arteriovenöser Fisteln von Dialysepatienten mit der Duplexsonographie. Ultraschall 10: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kottle SP, Gonzalez AC, Macon EJ, Fellner SK (1978) Ultrasonographic evaluation of vascular access complications. Radiology 129: 751–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotval PS, Shah PM, Berman H (1989) Doppler diagnosis of subclavian steal due to arteriovenous hemodialysis fistula in the ipsilateral arm. J Ultrasound Med 8: 697–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Krpan D, Demarin V, Prot F, Milutinovik S, Molnar V, Milutinovic E (1991). Measurement of blood flow through AV-fistulae by means of Doppler sonography in regularly haemodialysed patients. Int J Artif Organs 14: 78–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Landwehr P, Tschammler A, Schaefer RM, Lackner K (1990) Wertigkeit der farbkodiertem Duplexsonographie des Dialyseshunts. Fortschr Röntgenstr 153: 185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langer M, Fiegler W, Claussen C, Köhler D, Banzer D (1984) Arterielle digitale Subtraktionsangiographie zur Darstellung von Hämodialyseshunts. Radiologe 24: 576–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Middleton WD, Erickson S, Melson GL (1989) Perivascular color artifact: pathologic significance and appearance on color Doppler US images. Radiology 171 (3): 647–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Middleton WD, Picus DD, Marx MV, Melson GL (1989) Color Doppler sonography of hemodialysis vascular access: Comparison with angiography. AJR 152: 633–639Google Scholar
  18. Neufang KFR, Erasmi-Körber H, Wimmer G (1983) Verfahren der Shuntdarstellung bei Dialysepatienten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der digitalen Subtraktionsangiographie ( DSA ). Röntgenblätter 36: 145–151Google Scholar
  19. Oates CP, Williams ED, McHugh MI (1990) The use of a duplex ultrasound scanner to measure volume flow in arterio-venous fistulae in patients undergoing haemodialysis: an analysis of measurement uncertainties. Ultrasound Med Biol 16: 571–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Picus D, van Breda A, Katzen BT, Steinberg DL (1987) Use of digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of vascular access for hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 10: 210–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pourchez T, Moriniere P, Fournier A, Pietri J (1989) Use of Permcath ( Quinton) catheter in Uraemic patients in whom the creation of conventional vascular access for haemodialysis is difficult. Nephron 53: 297–302Google Scholar
  22. Quinton W, Dillard D, Scribner BH (1960) Cannulation of blood vessels for prolonged hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organ 6: 104Google Scholar
  23. Rodriguez-Perez JC, Maynar M, Rams A, et al (1990) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as best treatment in stenosis of vascular access for hemodialysis. Nephron 51: 192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheible W, Skram Chr, Leopold GR (1980) High resolution real-time sonography of hemodialysis vascular access complications. AJR 134: 1173–1176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schumcher KA, Wallner B, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM (1989) Shuntferne venöse Okklusionen als Störungsfaktoren bei der Hämodialyse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 150: 198–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwab SJ, Raymond JR, Saeed M, Newman GE, Dennis PA, Bollinger RR (1989) Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenosis. Kidney Int 36: 707–711Google Scholar
  27. Tordoir JH, Hoeneveld H, Eikelboom BC, Kitslaar PJ (1990) The correlation between clinical and duplex ultrasound parameters and the development of complications in arterio-venous fistulae for hemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Surg 4: 179–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tordoir JH, deBruin HG, Hoeneveld H, Eikelboom BC, Kitslaar PJ (1989) Duplex ultrasound scanning in the assessment of arteriovenous fistulas created for hemodialysis access: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 10: 122–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanholder R, Hoenich N, Ringoir S (1987) Morbidity and mortality of central venous catheter hemodialysis: a view of 10 years experience. Nephron 47: 274–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vorwerk D, Günther RW, Bohndorf K, Asgarzadeh A, Borchers K (1988) Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie ( Angiodynographie) in der Beurteilung arteriovenöser Shunts. Fortschr Röntgenstr 148: 265–268Google Scholar
  31. Windus DW, Audrain J, Vanderson R, Jendrisak MD, Picus D, Delmez JA (1990) Optimization of high-efficiency hemodialysis by detection and correction of fistula dysfunction. Kidney Int 38: 337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Hübsch
  • S. Trattnig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations