Stereotypy and asymmetry in mice

  • P. B. Dews
Conference paper
Part of the Journal of Neural Transmission book series (NEURAL SUPPL, volume 34)


Mice ran in a circular runway. Number and direction of circuits were recorded. Most control mice ran about the same number of circuits in each direction. After 100/µmol/kg cocaine there were 3.5 times as many circuits and most mice ran most circuits in one direction. Some mice ran strongly in one direction after a first dose of cocaine and strongly in the other direction after a second dose. Hence, the primary influence toward unidirectional running is stereotypy rather than asymmetry.


Harvard Medical School Individual Mouse Slight Bias Regional Primate Research Striatal Dopamine Release 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cooper SJ, Dourish CT (eds) (1990) Neurobiology of stereotyped behavior. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Dews PB (1990) Directional running in mice: effects of cocaine and chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacology 101: 190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glick SD, Jerussi TP, Zimmerberg B (1977) Behavioral and neuropharmacological correlates of nigrostriatal asymmetry in rats. In: Harnad S, Doty R, Goldstein L, Jaynes J, Krauthamer G (eds) Lateralization in the nervous system. Academic Press, New York, pp 213–249Google Scholar
  4. Glick SD, Hinds PA, Shapiro RM (1983) Cocaine-induced rotation: sex-dependent differences between left- and right-sided rats. Science 221: 775–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jerussi TP, Glick SD (1974) Amphetamine-induced rotation in rats without lesions. Neuropharmacology 13: 283–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kokkinidis L (1987) Amphetamine-elicited perseverative and rotational behavior: evaluation of directional preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26: 527–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1977) Perseveration and rotational behavior elicited by d-amphetamine in a y-maze exploratory task: differential effects of intraperitoneal and unilateral intraventricular administration. Psychopharmacology 52: 123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Randrup A, Munkvad I, Udsen P (1963) Adrenergic mechanisms and amphetamine induced abnormal behaviour. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 20: 145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ungerstedt U (1971a) Postsynaptic supersensitivity after 6-hydroxydopamine induced degeneration of the nigro-striatal dopamine system. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 367: 69–93Google Scholar
  10. Ungerstedt U (1971b) Striatal dopamine release after amphetamine or nerve degeneration revealed by rotational behaviour. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 367: 49–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. B. Dews
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of PsychobiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Behavioral Biology, New England Regional Primate Research CenterHarvard Medical SchoolSouthboroughUSA

Personalised recommendations