Medical educational and functional determinants of employment after stroke

  • H. Bergmann
  • M. Küthmann
  • A. v. Ungern-Sternberg
  • V. G. Weimann
Part of the Journal of Neural Transmission book series (NEURAL SUPPL, volume 33)


To evaluate the medical educational and functional determinants of employment after stroke a total of 204 Patients were assessed for functional changes during rehabilitation and after one year. Additionally the educational and social background of each patient was documented. One year after discharge from the rehabilitation unit 11.3% of the patients worked full-time and 2.7% part time. Another 14.7% had the decision pension versus employment still pending and 0.5% were classified as unemployed. 70.8% received regular retirement plan payments or disability pensions. Generally a similar level of functional capabilities can be observed after one year for working and non-working patients except for manual dexterity. Early admission to rehabilitation (within the first 12 weeks) favours return to work. A high school degree qualifying for university entrance and a well paid and better qualified profession as well are correlated with a higher percentage of patients regaining their employment. An other determining factor of employment after CVA is the physical requirement of the former work. Most of the working patients (92%) had been either transfered onto a job suited for an handicapped people or their work plan had been restructed accordingly.


Disability Pension Handicapped People High School Degree Manual Dexterity Rehabilitation Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson TP, Baldridge M, Ettinger MG (1979) Quality of care for completed stroke without rehabilitation: evaluation by assessing patient outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60: 103–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asplund K, Liliequist B, Fodstad H, Wester PO (1981) Long-term outcome in cerebro-vascular disease in relation to findings at aortocervical angiography. A 12-year follow up. Stroke 12: 307–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker C, Howard G, McLeroy KR, Yatsu FM, Toole JF, Coull B, Feibel J, Walker MD (1986) Community hospital-based stroke programs: North Carolina, Oregon, and New York. II. Description of study population. Stroke 17: 285–293Google Scholar
  4. Chino N, Anderson TP, Granger CV (1988) Stroke rehabilitation outcome studies: comparison of a Japanese facility with 17 U.S. facilities. Int Disabil Stud 10: 150–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feigenson JS, Gitlow HS, Greenberg SD (1979) The disability oriented rehabilitation unit — a major factor influencing stroke outcome. Stroke 10: 5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feigenson JS (1982) Toward a uniform assessment of “outcome”. Stroke 13: 873–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forer SK, Miller LS (1980) Rehabilitation outcome: comparative analysis of different patient types. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61: 359–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR (1979) Epidemiologic profile of long-term stroke disability: the Framinghamstudy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60: 487–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes SH, Carroll SR (1986) Early intervention care in the acute stroke patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 319–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemmingsen R, Mejsholm B, Boysen G, Engell HC (1982) Intellectual function in patients with transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) or minor stroke. Long-term improvement after carotid endarterectomy. Acta Neurol Scand 66: 145–159Google Scholar
  11. Howard G, Till JS, Toole JF, Matthews C, Truscott BL (1985) Factors influencing return to work following cerebral infarction. JAMA 253: 226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinsella G, Ford B (1980) Acute recovery from patterns in stroke patients: neuropsychological factors. Med J Aust 2: 663–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence L, Christie D (1979) Quality of life after stroke: a three-year follow-up. Age Ageing 8: 167–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis NA (1986) Functional gains in CVA patients: a nursing approach. Rehabit Nurs 11: 25–27Google Scholar
  15. Robinson RG, Starr LB, Lipsey JR, Rao K, Price TR (1985) A two-year longitudinal study of poststroke mood disorders. In-hospital prognostic factors associated with six-month outcome. J Nery Ment Dis 173: 221–226Google Scholar
  16. Sarno MT, Buonaguro A, Levita E (1985) Gender and recovery from aphasia after stroke. J Nery Ment Dis 173: 605–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singer F (1987) Zur Rehabilitation der cerebralen Apoplexie-Ergebnisse anhand von 156 Patienten. Rehabilitation 26 (1): 1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan ES (1983) Stroke rehabilitation — Singapore experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore 12 (3): 373–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Terent A (1983) Medico — social consquences and of stroke in a Swedish Community. Scand J Rehabil Med 15 (4): 165–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL (1983) Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64: 24–28PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Bergmann
    • 1
  • M. Küthmann
    • 2
  • A. v. Ungern-Sternberg
    • 2
  • V. G. Weimann
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine IIWeserberglandklinikHöxterFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine IIWeserbergland-KlinikHöxterFederal Republic of Germany
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine IWeserbergland-KlinikHöxterFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations