Epidemiology and out-patient care in Parkinson’s disease — Results from a pilot-study in Northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein)

  • P. Vieregge
  • J. Kleinhenz
  • H. Fassl
  • J. Jörg
  • D. Kömpf
Part of the Journal of Neural Transmission book series (NEURAL SUPPL, volume 33)


An attempt was made to estimate prevalence on Parkinsonism using consultation rates in physicians’ practices in a two-step, one-phasic pilot study in a rural-urban area of Northern Germany. Though participation of physicians was low, reported rates for Parkinsonian patients (183/100 000) were in the range yielded in comparable areas, but by different methodology. Only 64% of a large subsample of patients used L-Dopa preparations for therapy. Confirming previous results the objective records of doctors and the subjective notices of patients regarding disease state showed considerable differences in several important items.


Federal Republic Comparable Area Consultation Rate Personal Group Objective Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson DW, Schoenberg BS, Haerér AF (1982) Racial differentials in the prevalence of major neurological disorders. Neuroepidemiology 1: 17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gotham AM, Brown RG, Marsden CD (1986) Depression in Parkinson’s disease: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49: 381–389 Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neuro-logy 17: 427–442Google Scholar
  3. Jellinger K (1986) Overview of morphological changes in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 45: 1–18Google Scholar
  4. Kessler II (1972) Epidemiological studies of Parkinson’s disease. II. A hospital-based survey. Am J Epidemiol 95: 308–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kleinhenz J, Vieregge P, Fassl H, Jörg J (1990) Prävalenz des Morbus Parkinson in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland — Sind Praxiserhebungen ein geeignetes Erhebungsinstrument? Offend Gesundheitswesen 52: 181–190Google Scholar
  6. Koller W, O’Hara R, Weiner W, Lang A, Nutt J, Agid Y, Bonnet AM, Jankovic J (1986) Relationship of aging to Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 45: 317–321Google Scholar
  7. Mutch WJ, Dingwall-Fordyce I, Downie AW, Paterson JG, Roy SK (1986) Parkinson’s disease in a Scottish city. Br Med J 292: 534–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pedro Cuesta J (1987) Studies on the prevalence of paralysis agitans by tracer methodology. Acta Neurol Scand 75 [Suppl 1121: 7–106Google Scholar
  9. Schoenberg BS (1987) Environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease: the epidemiological evidence. Can J Neurol Sci 14: 407–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Statistisches Landesamt Schleswig-Holstein (1989) Ergebnisse der Volkszählung ‘87. KielGoogle Scholar
  11. Sutcliffe RCG, Prior R, Mawby B, McQuillan WJ (1985) Parkinson’s disease in the district of Northampton Health Authority, United Kingdom. A study of prevalence and disability. Acta Neurol Scand 72: 363–379Google Scholar
  12. Tanner CM (1989) The role of environmental toxins in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci 12: 49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vieregge
    • 2
  • J. Kleinhenz
    • 1
  • H. Fassl
    • 3
  • J. Jörg
    • 4
  • D. Kömpf
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für NeurologieWuppertalFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Klinik für NeurologieMedizinische UniversitätLübeck 1Federal Republic of Germany
  3. 3.Institut für Medizinische Statistik und DokumentationMedizinische Universität zu LübeckWuppertalFederal Republic of Germany
  4. 4.Neurologische KlinikKlinikum BarmenWuppertalFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations