Molecular Aspects of Self-incompatibility in the Solanaceae

  • Volker Haring
  • Bruce A. McClure
  • Adrienne E. Clarke
Part of the Plant Gene Research book series (GENE)


Many species of flowering plants have evolved genetically controlled mechanisms to prevent inbreeding. Fertilization in flowering plants involves a complex series of interactions between the haploid pollen which contains the male gametes, and the diploid tissues of the female pistil. Flowers are often hermaphroditic bearing the male and female organs in close proximity, so that the effectiveness of these mechanisms in preventing self-fertilization and promoting outcrossing is particularly important. Self-incompatibility (SI) is one of the most widespread mechanisms for preventing self-fertilization. It is the inability of seed plants to produce viable seeds after self-pollination. Study of the mechanism of self-incompatibility is not only of interest in relation to pollination but also as a model system for understanding cell-cell recognition in higher plants.


Pollen Tube RNase Activity Active Site Histidine Style RNases Allelic Specificity Determinant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ai Y, Singh A, Coleman CE, Ioerger TR, Kheyr-Pour A, Kao T-H (1990) Self-incompatibility in Petunia inflata: isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding three S-alleleassociated proteins. Plant Cell 3: 130–138Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MA, Cornish EC, Mau S-L, Williams EG, Hoggart R, Atkinson A, Bönig I, Grego B, Simpson R, Roche PJ, Haley JD, Niall HD, Tregear GW, Coghlan JP, Crawford RJ, Clarke AE (1986) Cloning of cDNA for a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 321: 38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MA, McFadden GI, Bernatzky R, Atkinson A, Orpin T, Dedman H, Tregear GW, Fernley R, Clarke AE (1989) Sequence variability of three alleles of the self-incompatibility gene of Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell 1: 483–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benner SA (1988) Extracellular `communicator RNA’. FEBS Lett 233: 225–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benner SA, Allemann RK (1989) The return of pancreatic ribonucleases. TIBS 14: 396–397 Bernatzky R, Anderson MA, Clarke AE (1988) Molecular genetics of self-incompatibility in lowering plants. Dev Genet 9: 1–12Google Scholar
  6. Charlesworth D (1988) Evolution of homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 60: 445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornish EC, Pettitt JM, Bönig I, Clarke AE (1987) Developmentally controlled expression of gene associated with self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 326: 99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornish EC, Anderson MA, Clarke AE (1988a) Molecular aspects of fertilization in flowering plants. Annu Rev Cell Biol 4: 209–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornish EC, Pettitt JM, Clarke AE (1988b) Self-incompatibility genes in flowering plants. In: Verma DPS, Goldberg RB (eds) Temporal and spatial regulation of plant genes. Springer, Wien New York, pp 117–130 [Dennis ES et al (eds) Plant gene research. Basic knowledge and application]Google Scholar
  10. Dayhoff MO, Barker WC, Hunt LT (1983) Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol 91: 524–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Nettancourt D (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York [Frankel R, Gall GAE, Linskens HF (eds) Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics, vol 3]Google Scholar
  12. deJong WW, Hendriks W, Mulders JWM, Bloemendal H (1989) Evolution of eye lens crystallins: the stress connection. Trends Biol Sci 14: 365–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebert PR, Anderson MA, Bernatzky R, Altschuler M, Clarke AE (1989) Genetic polymorphism of self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Cell 56: 255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endo Y, Tsurugi K, Lambert JM (1988) The site of action of six different ribosome-inactivating proteins from plants on eukaryotic ribosomes: the RNA N-glycosidase activity of the proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 150: 1032–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs P (1986) Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems have the same sporophytic mechanisms? Plant Syst Evol 154: 285–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heslop-Harrison J (1975) Incompatibility and the pollen—stigma interaction. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 26: 403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinata K, Nishio T (1978) S-allele specificity of stigma proteins in Brassica oleraceae and B. campestris. Heredity 41: 93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horiuchi H, Yanai K, Takagi M, Yano K, Wakabayashi E, Sanda A, Mine S, Ohgi K, Irie M (1988) Primary structure of a base non-specific ribonuclease from Rhizopus niveus. J Biochem 103: 408–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jahnen W, Batterham MP, Clarke AE, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ (1989a) Identification, isolation, and N-terminal sequencing of style glycoproteins associated with self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell 1: 493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jahnen W, Lush WM, Clarke AE (1989b) Inhibition of in vitro pollen tube growth by isolated S-glycoproteins of Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell 1: 501–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawata Y, Sakiyama F, Tamaoki H (1988) Amino-acid sequence of ribonuclease Tz from Aspergillus oryzae. Eur J Biochem 176: 683–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kheyr-Pour A, Bintrim SB, berger TR, Remy R, Hammond SA, Kao T-H (1990) Sequence diversity of pistil S-proteins associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell 3: 88–97Google Scholar
  23. Koniski J (1982) Colicins and other bacteriocins with established modes of actions. Annu Rev Microbiol 36: 125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis D (1949) Incompatibility in flowering plants. Biol Rev 24: 472–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis D (1952) Serological reactions of pollen incompatibility substances. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 140: 127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis D (1960) Genetic control of specificity and activity of the S antigen in plants. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 151: 468–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linskens HF (1960) Zur Frage der Entstehung der Abwehrkörper bei der Inkompabilitätsreaktion von Petunia. III. Mitteilung: Serologische Teste mit Leitsgewebs-und Pollenextrakten. Z Bot 48: 126–135Google Scholar
  28. Linskens HF (1975) Incompatibility in petunia. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 188: 299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Masaki H, Ohta T (1985) Colicin E3 and its immunity genes. J Mol Biol 182: 217–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McClure BA, Haring V, Ebert PR, Anderson MA, Simpson RJ, Sakiyama F, Clarke AE (1989) Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature 342: 955–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nasrallah JB, Kao T-H, Goldberg ML, Nasrallah ME (1985) A cDNA clone encoding an S locus-specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleraceae. Nature 318: 263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB (1986) Molecular biology of self-incompatibility in plants. Trends Genet 2: 239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nasrallah JB, Kao T-H, Chen C-H, Goldberg ML, Nasrallah ME (1987) Amino-acid sequence of glycoproteins encoded by three alleles of the S locus of Brassica oleraceae. Nature 326: 617–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandey KK (1958) Time of S-allele action. Nature 181: 1220–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pandey KK (1960) Time and site of the S-gene action, breeding systems and relationships in incompatibility. Euphytica 19: 364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pandey KK (1968) Compatibility relationships in flowering plants: role of the S-gene complex. Am Naturalist 102: 475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pettitt JM, Cornish EC, Clarke AE (1989) Structure and regulation of organ-and tissue-specific genes: structural and cytological features of incompatibility gene expression in flowering plants. In: Vasil IK, Schell J (eds) Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Molecular biology of plant nuclear genes, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 229–261Google Scholar
  38. Shapiro R, Vallee BL (1987) Human placental ribonuclease inhibitor abolishes both angiogenic and ribonucleolytic activities of angiogenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 2238–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stirpe F, Barbieri L (1986) Ribosome-inactivating proteins up to date. FEBS Lett 195: 1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone BA, Evans NA, Bönig I, Clarke AE (1984) The application of Sirofluor, a chemically defined fluorochrome from aniline blue, for the histochemical detection of callose. Protoplasma 122: 191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strydom DJ, Fett JW, Lobb RR, Alderman EM, Bethune JL, Riordan JF, Vallee BL (1985) Amino acid sequence of human tumor derived angiogenin. Biochemistry 24: 5486–5494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wissler JH, Logemann E, Meyer HE, Krützfeld B, Höckel M, Heilmeyer Jr LMG (1986) Structure and function of a monocytic blood vessel morphogen (angiotropin) for angiogenesis in vivo: a copper-containing metallo-polyribonucleo-polypeptide as a novel and unique type of monokine. Prot Biol Fluids 34: 525–536Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Haring
    • 1
  • Bruce A. McClure
    • 1
  • Adrienne E. Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Cell Biology Research Centre, School of BotanyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations