Advertisement

Electrophysiological methods in the early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease

  • C. H. Lücking
  • A. Hufschmidt
  • G. Deuschl
Part of the New Vistas in Drug Research book series (DRUG RESEARCH, volume 1)

Summary

Electrophysiological methods and motor performance tests are shown to be helpful to the early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The most sensitive out of five motor tests studied here is visuo-manual tracking. Tremor recordings allow to differentiate between physiological and pathological tremor. An enhancement of long-latency reflexes may precede the development of parkinsonian symptoms on the hitherto unaffected side in unilateral parkinsonism. The combination of motor function tests with tremor and long-latency reflex recordings is likely to be more sensitive than any single test.

Keywords

Essential Tremor Parkinsonian Patient Unaffected Side Electrophysiological Method Postural Tremor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Dick JPR, Day BL, Marsden CD (1986) Performance of simultaneous movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 109: 739–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Day BL, Dick JPR, Marsden CD (1984) Patients with Parkinson’s disease can employ a predictive motor strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47: 1299–1306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deuschl G, Lucking CH (1989) Tremor and electrically elicited long-latency reflexes in early stages of Parkinson’s disease. In: Przuntek H, Riederer P (eds) Early diagnosis and preventive therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Springer, Wien New York, p 103–110Google Scholar
  4. Deuschl G, Schenck E, Lucking CH (1985) Long-latency responses in human thenar muscles mediated by fast conducting muscle and cutaneous afferents. Neurosci Lett 55: 361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evarts EV, Teräiväinen H, Caine DB (1981) Reaction time in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 104: 167–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flowers K (1978) Lack of prediction in the motor behaviour of parkinsonism. Brain 101: 35–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldenberg G, Wimmer A, Auff E, Schnaberth G (1986) Impairment of motor planning in patients with Parkinson’s disease: evidence from ideomotor apraxia testing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49: 1266–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallett M (1985) Quantitative assessment of motor deficiency in Parkinson’s disease: ballistic movements. In: Delwaide PJ, Agnoli A (eds) Clinical neurophysiology in Parkinsonism. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 351Google Scholar
  9. Hömberg V, Hefter H, Reiners K, Freund HJ (1987) Differential effects of changes in mechanical limb properties on pyhsiological and pathological tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 568–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kraus PH, Przuntek H (1988) Motor performance test. In: Przuntek H, Riederer P (eds) Early diagnosis and preventive therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Springer, Wien New York, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  11. Lücking CH, Deuschl G, Strahl K, Schenck E (1986) Tremor im Früh-and Spätstadium der Parkinson-Krankheit. In: Fischer PA (Hrsg) Spätsyndrome der Parkinson-Krankheit. Editions Roche, Basel, S 99–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Lücking
    • 1
  • A. Hufschmidt
    • 1
  • G. Deuschl
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurologische Klinik und PoliklinikUniversität, Freiburg i. Br.Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations