Advertisement

Automated Percutaneous Nucleotomy — Initial Experience in Twenty-Five Cases of Contained Lumbar Disc Herniation

  • F. Gomes
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 43)

Summary

The posterolateral percutaneous approach using the automated nucleotome system has been used to treat twenty-five patients presenting with lumbar radiculopathy refractory to conservative care. The procedures were performed on an outpatient basis and under local anaesthesia and sedation. The patients were either worked up with the MRI, (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) or intra-thecal enhanced CT scan and/or lumbar myelography. All the patients were shown to have a contained central or lateral disc herniation that correlated well with the clinical findings.

The overall results within a short-term follow-up period (mean of six months) were comparable to those obtained with standard lumbar discectomy. A low postoperative morbidity was associated with this procedure and no significant intraoperative complications have occurred.

The indications as well as the pitfalls and potential complications of this surgical technique are emphasized in this report.

This preliminary study suggests that in carefully selected patients and in experienced hands this procedure offers a viable alternative to conventional discectomy.

Keywords

Disc Herniation Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Radicular Pain Lumbar Discectomy Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Friedman WA (1983) Percutaneous discectomy: an alternative to chemonucleolysis? Neurosurgery 13: 542–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T et al (1975) Percutaneous discectomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 5: 5–13 (Jpn)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hijikata S, Nakayama T, Yamagishi M, Ichihana M (1985) Per-cutaneous nucleotomy for low back pain, presented at the Sicot XIV World Congress, Kyoto, Japan, October 15–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houser OW, Onofrio BM, Forbes GS et al (1986) Correlation of radiological features to failure of lumbar intervertebral disc chemonucleolysis. J Neurosurg 64: 736–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kambin P, Gellman H (1983) Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 174: 127–132Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maroon JC, Alba AA (1985) Microdiscectomy versus chemonucleolysis. Neurosurgery 16: 644–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L et al (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJNR 6: 290–293;Google Scholar
  8. Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L et al (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJR 144: 1137–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L et al (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe: porcine and cadaver model. Radiology 155: 251–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Suezawa Y, Jacob HAC (1986) Percutaneous nucleotomy — an alternative to spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Comprehensive Spine CenterTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations