Advertisement

Forward and Backward Angles Deuteron Photodisintegration at Intermediate Energies

  • P. Levi Sandri
  • M. Anghinolfi
  • N. Bianchi
  • G. P. Capitani
  • P. Corvisiero
  • E. De Sanctis
  • C. Guaraldo
  • V. Lucherini
  • V. Muccifora
  • E. Polli
  • A. R. Reolon
  • G. Ricco
  • P. Rossi
  • M. Sanzone
  • M. Taiuti
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 2)

Abstract

The 2H(γ,p)n cross section was measured for the first time simultaneously at θpc.m.=0°, 90° and 180°. The photon energies were 170 and 210 MeV. A quasi-monochromatic photon beam was used and the photon spectrum measured on-line by a pair spectrometer. The results confirm the consistency among all experimental data from monochromatic photon beams and indicate that the angular distributions are less isotropic than predicted by theory. Very likely this shortcoming can be cured by introducing relativistic corrections.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Differential Cross Section Photon Beam Relativistic Correction Photon Energy Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.J. Hughes et al., Nucl. Phys. A267, 329 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Partovi, Ann. of Phys. 27, 79 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ninane et al., Can. J. Phys. 62, 1104 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Dupont et al., Nucl. Phys. A445, 13 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.O. Meyer et al., Phys. Rev., C31, 309 (1985);ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Zieger, et al., Few-Body Syst. 1, 135 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Cambi, et al., Phys. Rev. C26, 2358 (1982) and J.Phys. G10, Lll (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L.Friar,et al., Phys. Rev. C30, 441 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.Jaus and W.S. Woolcook, Nucl. Phys. A431, 669 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.H. Althoff et al., Z. Phys. C21. 149 (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. De Sanctis et al., Phys, Rev. C34, 413 (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.P. De Pascale et al, Phys. Rev. C32, 1830 (1985); R. Bernabei et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1542 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Arends et al., Nucl. Phys. A412, 509 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Baba, et al., Phys. Rev. C28, 286 (1983).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.M. Laget, Nucl. Phys. A312, 265, (1978) and Can.J. Phys. 62, 1046 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W.Leidemann and H.Arenhovel,Phys.Lett.139B,22(1984);Can.J.Phys.62,1036 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.P. Capitani et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 216, 307 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.P. Capitani et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 178, 61 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Anghinolfi et al.,Nuovo Cimento 88A, 257 (1985).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.M. Laget, prívate communication.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.Leidemann and H.Arenhôvel, Nucl. Phys. A465,573 (1987), and Mainz internal report MKPH-T-87, and private communication.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Levi Sandri
    • 1
  • M. Anghinolfi
    • 2
    • 3
  • N. Bianchi
    • 1
  • G. P. Capitani
    • 1
  • P. Corvisiero
    • 2
    • 3
  • E. De Sanctis
    • 1
  • C. Guaraldo
    • 1
  • V. Lucherini
    • 1
  • V. Muccifora
    • 1
  • E. Polli
    • 1
  • A. R. Reolon
    • 1
  • G. Ricco
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. Rossi
    • 1
  • M. Sanzone
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Taiuti
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratori Nazionali di FrascatiIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareFrascatiItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Fisicadell’Università di GenovaGenovaItaly
  3. 3.Sezione di GenovaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations