Electrodisintegration of Few Body Systems at Slac and the Y Scaling Approach

  • Z. E. Meziani
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 1)


It is proposed that extraction of the scaling function F(y) from the transverse and longitudinal response functions in inclusive quasielastic electron scattering from 3 He and 4 He is a powerful method to either study the validity regime of the impulse approximation by allowing the access to the high nucleon momentum components in these nuclei, or the electromagnetic properties of bound nucleons.


Momentum Distribution Scaling Function Electromagnetic Form Factor Impulse Approximation Magnetic Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G. B. West, Phys. Rep. 18C, 269 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. D. Zimmerman, C. F. Williamson and Y. Kawazowe, Phy. Rev. C19 279 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    I. Sick, D. Day and J. S. McCarthy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 871 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Bosted et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1380 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Pace and G. Salmé, Phys. Lett. 110B 411 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Ciofi Degli Atti, E. Pace and G. Salmé, Phys. Lett. 127B.. 303 (1983)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. A. Gurvitz, S. Wallace and J. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C, (1986). 362Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Ciofi degli Atti, in “Few-body problems in Physics”, L. D. Faddeev and T. I. Kopaleishvili Eds, World Publishing, Singapore 1984, pag 463.Google Scholar
  9. C. Ciofi dégli Atti, E. Pace and G. Salmè, Czech. J. Phys B36, 960 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. C. Ciofi degli Atti, E. Pace and G. Salmè, These Proceedings.Google Scholar
  11. [9]
    I. Sick, Phys. Lett. 157B 13 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. [10]
    J. J. Aubert et al, Phys. Lett. 123B, 275 (1983).Google Scholar
  13. [11]
    R. G. Arnold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 727 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [12]
    D. Day et aL NE3 Experiment Preliminary resultsGoogle Scholar
  15. [13]
    S. Rock, R. Arnold, B. Chertok, Z. Szalata, D. Day, J. S. McCarthy, F. Martin, B. A. Mecking, I. Sick, and G. Tamas, Phys. Rev. C26, 1592 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [14]
    Y. Akaishi, Contribution to this conference.Google Scholar
  17. [15]
    J. M. Laget, Phys. Lett. 151B 325(1985).Google Scholar
  18. [16]
    J. C. Marchand et al.Phys. Lett. 153B,(1985).Google Scholar
  19. [17]
    C. Ciofi degli Atti and G. Salmè, Proc. of the 6th Seminar “Electromagnetic Interactions of Nuclei at Low and Medium Energies”, Moscow Dec. 10–12 1984, p. 224.Google Scholar
  20. [18]
    P. Barreau et al, Nucl. Phys. A402, 515 (1983).Google Scholar
  21. [19]
    P. J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2560 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. E. Meziani
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCenter Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Linear AcceleratorCenter Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations