Few Body Studies at Bates: Recent Past and Near Future

  • W. Turchinetz
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 1)


A brief review is given of elements of the Bates program of electromagnetic probing of few nucleon systems. A few topics on electron scattering are discussed in some detail at the expense of the rest of the program. The selection is based on the relative amount of laboratory resources used in the recent past and planned for the near future. An attempt is made to provide an adequate list of references for those who wish to find out more about work which is mentioned only in passing.


Form Factor Duty Factor Spin Transfer Nucleon Form Factor Charge Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. B. Flanz, S. B. Kowalski and C. P. Sargent, IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. NS28, 2847 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates Proposal for a CW Upgrade (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Bertozzi et al., Nucl. Instr. & Meth. 162, 211 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. P..Juster et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2261 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C23, 363 (1981).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Garcon, Contribution to the CEBAF Summer Workshop 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. E. Schulze et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 597 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. F. Dmitriev et al., Phys. Lett. 157B, 143 (1985) and preprint INP - Novosibirsk 86–75.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. E. Schulze, Ph.D Thesis, MIT, unpublished.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Gari and H. Hyuga, Nucl. Phys. A264, 409 (1976); A274, 333 (1976); A278, 372 (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. L. Friar, Ann. Phys. (NY) 81, 332 (1973) and Phys. Rev. C12, 685 (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Dymarz and F. C. Khanna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1448 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. P. Kobushkin and V. P. Shelest, Sov. J. Part. & Nucl. 14, 483 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. E. Carlson and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 127 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bates Proposal 84–17, J. M. Cameron, M. E. Schulze and W. Turchinetz, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Garcon et al., preprint DPhN/Saclay 2258 (1986), to be published in Nucl. Phys.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. J. Stephenson et al., IUCF Scientific and Technical Report, 58 (1983).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Garcon and J. M. Cameron, private communication.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bates Proposal 85–05, R. Madey and S. Kowalski, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bates Proposal 81–06, W. Bertozzi, J. M. Finn and M. A. Kovash, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bates Proposals 82–06, A. Bernstein and B. Quinn, co-Spokesmen and 80–17, R. Whitney, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Arenhovel, Nukleonika 24, 273 (1979); W. Fabian and H. Arenhovel, Nucl. Phys. A314, 253 (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Ciofi degli Atti, E. Pace and G. Salma, Phys. Lett. 141B and private communication.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Z. E. Mezziani, Nucl. Phys. A446, 113C (1985).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Marchand et al., Phys. Lett. 153B, 29 (1985).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bates Proposal 76–05, G. Peterson, Spokesman; B. Parker et al., UMass preprint, Sept. 1986, submitted to Phys. Rev. C.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Leidemann and H. Arenhovel, Nucl. Phys. A393, 385 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. J. Moniz, Phys. Rev. 184, 1154 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bates Proposal 84–15, M. Epstein and S. Margaziotis, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bates Proposal 86–04, M. Kovash, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bates Proposal 86–13, C. Papanicolas, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bates Proposal 86–12, G. Chang, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bates Proposal 86–10, J. Lightbody, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bates Proposal 86–05, J. M. Finn, Spokesman.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. L. Matthews, Can. J. Phys. 62, 1100 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    W. Turchinetz, Nucl. Phys. A446, 23C (1985).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. A. Schumacher et al., Phys. Rev. C33, 50 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    D. R. Tieger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 755 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. J. Austin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 972 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. Miller, private communication.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bates Proposal 83–11, A. Bernstein and S. Dytman, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bates Proposal 86–07, S. Dytman and J. C. Peng, co-Spokesmen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Turchinetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Bates Linear Accelerator CenterLNS and Physics Department Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMiddletonUSA

Personalised recommendations