Advertisement

Electron Scattering and Few-Nucleon Systems

  • Bernard Frois
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 1)

Abstract

In the past few years, considerable progress has been achieved in theoretical calculations of few-nucleon systems. This meeting has shown in particular that calculations with a two-body force are now reliable and numerically accurate. The amount of data that are both quantitative and interpretable is scarce. Traditionnally, one has considered binding energies, charge radii, magnetic dipole and charge quadrupole moments as a primary source of information on bound-states. These observables are no longer sufficient to test the state of the art in theoretical calculations. The major problem is that it is now clear that nuclear physics cannot be described in terms of nucleons only. There are many more degrees of freedom due to the presence of mesons and excitations of the nucleons. These effects modify charge and current distributions, and introduce many-body forces. It is impossible with a few numbers to disentangle these effects. Electron scattering has proved to be the best experimental approach to solve this problem.

Keywords

Form Factor Charge Radius Final State Interaction Magnetic Form Factor Charge Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Auffret et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 649 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Gari and H. Hyuga, Nucl. Phys. A264, 409 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Bosted, 2nd Conference on the Intersections Between Particle and Nuclear Physics 1976, AIP Proceedings 150 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    E.M. Nyman and D.O. Riska, University of Helsinki, preprint 86–25.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Coester et al., private communication.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.G. Arnold, C.E. Carlson and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C21, 1426 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Zuilhof and J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C24, 736 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Carlson, V.J. Pandharipande and R.B. Wiringa, Nucl. Phys. A401, 59 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Friar et al., Phys. Rev. C34, 1463 51986 ).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Hajduk et al., Nucl. Phys. A405, 581 (1983);ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. W. Strueve et al., Nucl. Phys. A405, 620 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [11]
    R. Schiavilla, V.J. Pandharipande and R.B. Wiringa, Nucl. Phys. A449, 219 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    M. Traini and G. Orlandini, Z. Phys. A321, 479 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [13]
    I. Sick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 871 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    F.P. Juster et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2261 (1985) and references therein.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Frois
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de Physique Nucléaire — Haute EnergieCEN SaclayGif-sur-Yvette CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations