Polarized Radiative Capture Experiments and the D-State of 4He and 3He

  • H. R. Weller
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 1)


The tensor polarized capture reactions 2H(d,γ)4He and 1H(d,γ)3He are a sensitive means for measuring D-state effects in 4He and 3He. Data and recent calculations are considered. Values for the D-to-S state asymptotic ratio of −0.2 ± 0.05 for 4He and 0.032 ± 0.014 for 3He are deduced from the capture data. Results are compared to the results of other recent measurements of D-state effects in these systems. The effect of the D-state of 4He on the low energy 2H(d,γ)4He cross-section is shown to be profound.


Scatter Phase Shift Tensor Analyze Power Spin Dependent Part Vector Analyze Power Bound State Wavefunctions 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Zurmuhle, W. Stephens and H. Straub, Phys. Rev. 132, 751 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.E. Meyerhof, W. Feldman, S. Gilbert and W. O’Connell, Nucl. Phys. A131, 489 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.M. Skopik and W.R. Dodge, Phys. Rev. C6 43 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Poutissou and W. Del Bianco, Nucl. Phys. A199, 517 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.R. Weller, P. Colby, N.R. Roberson and D.R. Tilley, Phys. Rev. Letts. 53, 1325 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Mellema, T.R. Wang and W. Haeberli, Phys. Letts. 166B, 282 (1986); and private communication.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.D.Santos, A. Arriaga, A.M. Eiró and J.A. Tostevin, Phys. Rev. C31, 707 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.A. Tostevin, to be published in Phys. Rev. C (private communication).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Schiavilla, V.R. Pandharipande and R.B. Wiringa, Nucl. Phys. A449, 219 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.S. Chwieroth, Y.C.Tang and D.R. Thompson, Nucl. Phys. A189, 1 (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.R. Weller, P. Colby, J. Langenbrunner, Z.D. Huang, D.R. Tilley, F.D. Santos, A. Arriaga and A.M. Eiró, Phys. Rev. C34, 32 (1986). (note: Fig. 12 comes from this paper, but plotting errors were corrected for the present paper).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.A. Barnes, K.H. Chang, T.R. Donoghue, C. Rolfs and J Kammeraad, (private communication), submitted to Phys. Rev. Letts.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.F. Wilkerson III and F.E. Cecil, Phys. Rev. C31, 2036 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.A. Fowler, G.R. Caughlan and B.A. Zimmerman, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap. 5, 525 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.R. Weller, R.M. Whitton, S. Kuhn, E. Hayward and W. Dodge, private communication.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Pitts, IUCF (private communication).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.C. Karp, E.J. Ludwig, W.J. Thompson and F.D. Santos, Phys. Rev. Letts. 53, 1619 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.C. Karp, E.J. Ludwig, J.E. Bowsher, B.L. Burks, T B Clegg, F.D. Santos and A.M. Eiró, Nucl. Phys. A457, 15 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.C. Vetterli, J.A. Kuehner, A.J. Trudel, C.L. Woods, R. Dymarz, A.A. Pilt and H.R. Weller, Phys. Rev. Letts. 54, 1129 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Jourdan et al., Nucl. Phys. A453, 220 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Vuaridel et al., Invited talk at the International Symposium on the Three-Body Force in the Three-Nucleon System, Washington, D.C., 1986 (and W. Grüebler, private communication).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B.F. Gibson and D.R. Lehman, Phys. Rev. C29, 1017 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drs. L.C. Biedenham (Duke U.) and M. Danos (NBS) have suggested that the behavior of Ay as a function of energy is correlated with the behavior of the ratio of the 4He(γ,p)-to-4He(γ,n) cross sections. This ratio has been previously viewed as evidence for charge symmetry breaking (CSB). However, Biedenharn and Danos have pointed out that charge polarization of the deuterons can be the mechanism for this apparent CSB. Their model also leads to a dipole moment and therefore to the existence of El radiation in the d+d capture channel. This El radiation should disappear as the (γ,p)-to-(γ,n) ratio approaches 1 (i.e., near EX 30 MeV or Ed=12 MeV). If Ay arises from El-E2 interference, then its energy dependence is consistent with this model.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. R. Weller
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University and Triangle Universities Nuclear LaboratoryDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations